• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何用于检测研究与教育中人工智能生成内容的技术解决方案并不充分。

Why technical solutions for detecting AI-generated content in research and education are insufficient.

作者信息

Otterbacher Jahna

机构信息

Cyprus Center for Algorithmic Transparency (CyCAT), Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.

fAIre Research Group, CYENS Centre of Excellence, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

Patterns (N Y). 2023 Jul 14;4(7):100796. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100796.

DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100796
PMID:37521044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382978/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content detectors are not foolproof and often introduce other problems, as shown by Desaire et al. and Liang et al. in papers published recently in and Rather than "fighting" AI with more AI, we must develop an academic culture that promotes the use of generative AI in a creative, ethical manner.

摘要

正如德赛尔等人以及梁等人在最近发表于[具体刊物1]和[具体刊物2]上的论文中所表明的那样,人工智能(AI)生成内容检测器并非万无一失,而且常常会引发其他问题。我们不应靠更多的人工智能来“对抗”人工智能,而必须营造一种学术文化,以创造性、合乎道德的方式促进生成式人工智能的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/10382978/8c54181c3fe7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/10382978/8c54181c3fe7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/10382978/8c54181c3fe7/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Why technical solutions for detecting AI-generated content in research and education are insufficient.为何用于检测研究与教育中人工智能生成内容的技术解决方案并不充分。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Jul 14;4(7):100796. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100796.
2
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life.为何以及如何在学术生活中接纳诸如ChatGPT之类的人工智能。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Aug 23;10(8):230658. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230658. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
The ChatGPT Effect: Nursing Education and Generative Artificial Intelligence.ChatGPT效应:护理教育与生成式人工智能
J Nurs Educ. 2024 Feb 5:1-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20240126-01.
4
Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) in pharmacy education: Utilization and implications for academic integrity: A scoping review.药学教育中的生成式人工智能(Gen-AI):应用及对学术诚信的影响:一项范围综述
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jul 18;15:100481. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100481. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Detecting manuscripts written by generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the field of pharmacy practice.检测药学实践领域中由生成式人工智能和人工智能辅助技术撰写的手稿。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jan 12;17(1):2303759. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2303759. eCollection 2024.
6
[Subverting the Future of Teaching: Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Nursing Education].[颠覆教学未来:护理教育中的人工智能创新]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2024 Apr;71(2):20-25. doi: 10.6224/JN.202404_71(2).04.
7
ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: Potential Impact and Opportunity.ChatGPT 和生成式人工智能在医学教育中的应用:潜在影响与机遇。
Acad Med. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Navigating Generative AI: Opportunities, Limitations, and Ethical Considerations in Massage Therapy and Beyond.驾驭生成式人工智能:按摩疗法及其他领域的机遇、局限与伦理考量
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2023 Dec 1;16(4):1-4. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v16i4.949. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education.生成式语言模型在医学教育中的出现。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jun 6;9:e48163. doi: 10.2196/48163.
10
The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing.透明度的重要性:在学术写作中声明使用生成式人工智能(AI)。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024 Mar;56(2):314-318. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12938. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Almost Nobody Is Using ChatGPT to Write Academic Science Papers (Yet).几乎没有人(目前)使用ChatGPT来撰写学术科学论文。
Big Data Cogn Comput. 2024 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.3390/bdcc8100133. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions.已发表临床试验的可信度评估:领域与问题的文献综述
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Aug 20;2(8):e12099. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12099. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Content Detectors Using Human and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Writing.

本文引用的文献

1
GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers.GPT检测器对非英语母语的写作者存在偏见。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Jul 10;4(7):100779. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779. eCollection 2023 Jul 14.
2
Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools.使用现成的机器学习工具,以超过99%的准确率区分学术科学写作与人类或ChatGPT所写内容。
Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2023 Jun 21;4(6). doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101426. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers.
使用人类和人工智能生成的科学写作来评估人工智能内容检测器的性能。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6387-6393. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15549-6. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
4
Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research.人工智能在外科手术中的当前及未来应用:对临床实践和研究的启示
Front Surg. 2024 May 9;11:1393898. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1393898. eCollection 2024.
5
Accurately detecting AI text when ChatGPT is told to write like a chemist.当要求ChatGPT模仿化学家写作时准确检测人工智能生成的文本。
Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2023 Nov;4(11). doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101672. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
使用检测器和不知情的人类评审员,将ChatGPT生成的科学摘要与真实摘要进行比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 26;6(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6.