• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Watson Extraction System for removal of well-fixed femoral stems: A retrospective review of 10 cases.用于取出牢固固定股骨柄的沃森取出系统:10例回顾性研究
J Orthop. 2023 Jul 17;43:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.012. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中的大转子延长截骨术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jul 21;13(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00003. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
3
Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.在接受阶梯式短缩截骨术的全髋关节置换术治疗的高位髋关节脱位患者中,近端三分之一涂层逐渐变细的柄比圆柱形三分之二涂层的柄的并发症发生率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):569-577. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
4
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular Fluted Tapered Stem for a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture.采用模块化带槽锥形柄治疗假体周围股骨骨折的翻修全髋关节置换术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jul 21;13(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00023. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
5
Impaction Bone Grafting for Severe Femoral Bone Loss: Surgical Technique in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.严重股骨骨量丢失的嵌压植骨术:翻修全髋关节置换术的手术技术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Feb 16;12(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00043. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) and fluted tapered modular stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Does ETO integrity or consolidation, really matter?翻修髋关节置换术中的大转子延长截骨术(ETO)和带槽锥形模块化柄。ETO的完整性或愈合情况真的重要吗?
J Orthop. 2021 Feb 9;23:250-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.001. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
7
Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.REDAPT 一体式、渐缩、带槽、喷砂、锻造钛制翻修股骨柄的短期疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):191-197. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0743.R1.
8
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
9
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.非骨水泥模块化、开槽、锥形柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中治疗大块股骨骨缺损的中期至长期疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):989-1000. doi: 10.1111/os.12936. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Aseptic Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Modular Femoral Stem and a Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy-Treatment Assessment With the Forgotten Joint Score-12.采用单一模块化股骨柄和改良扩大转子截骨术进行全髋关节置换无菌翻修术——使用遗忘关节评分-12进行治疗评估
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 18;15:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.024. eCollection 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Limited Femorotomy as an Alternative to Extensive Trochanteric Osteotomy for Cementless Femoral Prosthesis Revision.使用有限股骨切开术替代广泛转子截骨术进行非骨水泥型股骨假体翻修
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Feb 25;32:101640. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101640. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Femoral stem extraction devices.股骨柄取出装置。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05701-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Exchanging Cerclage Fixation after Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.翻修全髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染中转子下截骨延长术后更换环扎固定的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Feb;38(2):367-371. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.041. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Removing Well-Fixed, Collared and Noncollared Tapered Hip Stems Without an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Using a Novel Stem Removal System.使用新型柄取出系统,在不进行大转子延长截骨的情况下取出固定良好的带颈和无颈锥形髋关节柄。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Sep 9;11:146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.004. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Contemporary Outcomes of 612 Hips.髋关节翻修术中的大转子延长截骨术:612 髋的当代疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 20;103(2):162-173. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00215.
4
Intravenous tranexamic acid for reducing perioperative blood loss during revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study.静脉注射氨甲环酸减少髋关节翻修术中围手术期失血:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):519-523. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19044.
5
The Optimal Dosing Regimen for Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.氨甲环酸在翻修全髋关节置换术中的最佳剂量方案:一项多中心随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 4;102(21):1883-1890. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00010.
6
Outcomes and Risk Factors of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中延长转子间截骨术的结果和风险因素:系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3410-3416. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Prolonged operative time increases risk of blood loss and transfusion requirements in revision hip surgery.在髋关节翻修手术中,手术时间延长会增加出血风险和输血需求。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Oct;30(7):1181-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02677-4. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.美国 2030 年翻修髋和膝关节置换术的预测和流行病学。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S79-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Intraoperative hemorrhage in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-center study.翻修全髋关节置换术中的术中出血:一项回顾性单中心研究。
J Anesth. 2019 Jun;33(3):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02644-2. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
The Use of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Reconstruction of the Hip for Infection.扩大型转子下截骨术在髋关节感染 2 期重建中的应用。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1470-1475. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.054. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

用于取出牢固固定股骨柄的沃森取出系统:10例回顾性研究

The Watson Extraction System for removal of well-fixed femoral stems: A retrospective review of 10 cases.

作者信息

Salomon Kevin, Shen Victor, Sullivan Alex, Grayson Christopher, Lyons Steven, Palumbo Brian T

机构信息

University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 560 Channelside Dr, Tampa, FL, 33602, USA.

Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL, 33607, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Jul 17;43:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.012. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.012
PMID:37521949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10374600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revision of well-fixed cementless femoral stems is a challenging and time-consuming aspect of revision hip arthroplasty. The Watson Extraction System (WES) is a novel, size-specific 3-D fabricated instrument that mimics the outer geometry of the implanted femoral stem. The device acts to cut circumferentially around the stem as it is impacted into place, effectively disrupting the bone-implant interface.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review assessing the experience of 3 fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons who used the WES to extract 10 well-fixed femoral stems during rTHA between 11/7/2020 and 11/7/2022. Outcomes and measures included: ability to remove the stem without a femoral osteotomy, femoral stem extraction time, incidence of femoral fracture, stem type used for reconstruction, blood loss, total surgical time, post-operative complications.

RESULTS

No femoral osteotomies were required. The mean time for stem extraction was 7 min (range, 2-13), and there were 2 (20%) intra-operative femoral fractures. The stem type utilized for reconstruction included: 4 (40%) modular, tapered style stems, 3 (30%) antibiotic spacers, 2 (20%) primary style stems, and 1 (10%) ream and broach proximally porous stem. The mean blood loss was 425 ml (range, 200-800), total surgical time was 160 min (range, 107-232), and duration of follow-up was 7 months (range, 2-22 months).

CONCLUSION

The WES may mitigate the need for femoral osteotomy, reduce femoral stem extraction and overall intraoperative time, and decrease blood loss in rTHA. Further, reduced bone loss with use of this device may permit final reconstruction with a primary style stem.

摘要

背景

翻修固定良好的非骨水泥型股骨柄是髋关节置换翻修手术中一项具有挑战性且耗时的工作。沃森取出系统(WES)是一种新型的、特定尺寸的三维打印器械,它模仿植入股骨柄的外部几何形状。该装置在将其打入就位时围绕股骨柄进行圆周切割,有效地破坏骨-植入物界面。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,评估了3名接受过成人重建 fellowship 培训的外科医生在2020年11月7日至2022年11月7日期间使用WES在翻修全髋关节置换术中取出10个固定良好的股骨柄的经验。结果和测量指标包括:无需股骨截骨即可取出股骨柄的能力、股骨柄取出时间、股骨骨折发生率、用于重建的股骨柄类型、失血量、总手术时间、术后并发症。

结果

无需进行股骨截骨。股骨柄取出的平均时间为7分钟(范围为2 - 13分钟),术中发生2例(20%)股骨骨折。用于重建的股骨柄类型包括:4个(40%)模块化锥形柄、3个(30%)抗生素间隔物、2个(20%)初次使用型柄和1个(10%)近端扩髓及拉削的多孔柄。平均失血量为425毫升(范围为200 - 800毫升),总手术时间为160分钟(范围为107 - 232分钟),随访时间为7个月(范围为2 - 22个月)。

结论

WES可能减少股骨截骨的需求,缩短股骨柄取出时间和总体手术时间,并减少翻修全髋关节置换术中的失血量。此外,使用该装置减少的骨量丢失可能允许使用初次使用型柄进行最终重建。