Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Jul 3;30(7):1121-1129. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad156.
Use of traditional opioids (TOs) for pain management has been associated with adverse outcomes among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). It is unknown if similar associations exist for tramadol, a partial opioid agonist and serotonin and norephinephrine reuptake inhibitor. We sought to compare adverse outcomes associated with tramadol vs TOs in an IBD population.
This nationwide cohort study included adults with IBD diagnosed from 1995 to 2021 in Denmark with subsequent prescriptions for tramadol or TOs. For each analgesic, 2 populations were assessed: initial users (first prescription) and persistent users (first 3 consecutive prescriptions within 365 days). Outcomes included infection, bowel obstruction/ileus, IBD surgery, and mortality within 90 days after the initial use index date (date of first prescription) and within 365 days after the persistent use index date (date of third prescription). Odds ratios adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and IBD severity were calculated using multivariable logistic regression.
We identified 37 377 initial users and 15 237 persistent users of tramadol or TOs. Initial users of tramadol had lower adjusted odds of infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.99), bowel obstruction/ileus (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03), and mortality (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55), and a higher adjusted odds of IBD-related surgery (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60) vs initial users of TOs. Similar results were found for persistent users.
Tramadol was associated with lower odds of infection, bowel obstruction/ileus, and mortality vs TOs among patients with IBD. These associations may be impacted by residual confounding.
在患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的患者中,使用传统阿片类药物(TOs)进行疼痛管理与不良结局相关。曲马多作为一种部分阿片类激动剂和 5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,其是否与 TOs 存在类似的关联尚不清楚。我们旨在比较 IBD 人群中曲马多与 TOs 相关的不良结局。
这项全国性队列研究纳入了 1995 年至 2021 年期间在丹麦被诊断为 IBD 且随后开具曲马多或 TOs 处方的成年人。对于每种镇痛药,评估了 2 个人群:初始使用者(首次处方)和持续使用者(首次处方后 365 天内连续 3 次处方)。结局包括首次使用索引日期(首次处方日期)后 90 天内和持续使用索引日期(第 3 次处方日期)后 365 天内的感染、肠梗阻/肠麻痹、IBD 手术和死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归计算调整了人口统计学、合并症和 IBD 严重程度的比值比。
我们确定了 37377 名初始使用曲马多或 TOs 的使用者和 15237 名持续使用者。与 TOs 初始使用者相比,曲马多初始使用者发生感染(调整比值比 [OR],0.80;95%置信区间 [CI],0.65-0.99)、肠梗阻/肠麻痹(aOR,0.74;95% CI,0.53-1.03)和死亡率(aOR,0.43;95% CI,0.35-0.55)的调整比值比较低,而发生 IBD 相关手术(aOR,1.27;95% CI,1.02-1.60)的调整比值比较高。持续使用者也有类似的结果。
与 TOs 相比,曲马多与 IBD 患者较低的感染、肠梗阻/肠麻痹和死亡率相关。这些关联可能受到残余混杂因素的影响。