• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荧光成像设备在糖尿病伤口诊断中的准确性:使用组织培养系统的初步研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of a fluorescence imaging device in diabetic wounds: a pilot study using a tissue culture system.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Wounds. 2023 Jul;35(7):E218-E223. doi: 10.25270/wnds/23002.

DOI:10.25270/wnds/23002
PMID:37523738
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

DFUs are challenging chronic wounds that are vulnerable to infections. A fluorescence imaging device was developed to detect bacterial presence in wounds. This device utilizes the principle that when illuminated by violet light, some bacteria emit red fluorescence and others, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, emit cyan fluorescence. Several studies have reported the accuracy of this device. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no studies have examined the correlation between bacterial presence and tissue biopsy culture results in diabetic wounds.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a fluorescence imaging device using a tissue culture system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients (48 wounds) were included. Wounds were sampled using tissue culture methods and photographed using the fluorescence imaging device. Culture outcomes were categorized into non-Pseudomonas bacterial, Pseudomonas bacterial, both bacterial, and no-growth groups. Image outcomes were categorized into red, cyan, both colors, and negative groups.

RESULTS

For detecting the presence of bacteria, the fluorescence imaging device showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 64.1%, 55.6%, 86.2%, and 26.3%, respectively, with an accuracy of 62.5%. For P aeruginosa, the device showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 66.7%, 87.2%, 54.6%, and 91.9%, respectively, with an accuracy of 83.3%. For non-Pseudomonas bacteria, the device showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 43.8%, 62.5%, 70.0%, and 35.7%, respectively, with an accuracy of 50.0%.

CONCLUSION

The fluorescence imaging device can help to detect the bacterial bioburden; however, its accuracy may be lower than that reported in previous studies of diabetic wounds.

摘要

简介

DFUs 是具有挑战性的慢性伤口,容易感染。已经开发出一种荧光成像设备来检测伤口中的细菌存在。该设备利用这样的原理,即当被紫光照射时,一些细菌发出红色荧光,而其他细菌,如铜绿假单胞菌,则发出青色荧光。已有多项研究报告了该设备的准确性。然而,据作者所知,尚无研究检查过糖尿病伤口中细菌存在与组织活检培养结果之间的相关性。

目的

本研究旨在使用组织培养系统研究荧光成像设备的诊断准确性。

材料和方法

纳入 35 名患者(48 处伤口)。使用组织培养方法对伤口进行采样,并使用荧光成像设备对其进行拍照。培养结果分为非铜绿假单胞菌细菌、铜绿假单胞菌细菌、两种细菌和无生长组。图像结果分为红色、青色、两种颜色和阴性组。

结果

在检测细菌存在方面,荧光成像设备的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 64.1%、55.6%、86.2%和 26.3%,准确性为 62.5%。对于铜绿假单胞菌,该设备的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 66.7%、87.2%、54.6%和 91.9%,准确性为 83.3%。对于非铜绿假单胞菌细菌,该设备的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 43.8%、62.5%、70.0%和 35.7%,准确性为 50.0%。

结论

荧光成像设备可帮助检测细菌生物负荷;然而,其准确性可能低于之前对糖尿病伤口的研究报告。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of a fluorescence imaging device in diabetic wounds: a pilot study using a tissue culture system.荧光成像设备在糖尿病伤口诊断中的准确性:使用组织培养系统的初步研究。
Wounds. 2023 Jul;35(7):E218-E223. doi: 10.25270/wnds/23002.
2
Efficacy of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device in an outpatient wound care clinic: a pilot study.一种细菌荧光成像设备在门诊伤口护理诊所的疗效:一项试点研究。
J Wound Care. 2019 Jul 2;28(7):438-443. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.7.438.
3
Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study.使用新型手持式自体荧光伤口成像设备检测烧伤创面细菌:一项初步研究。
J Wound Care. 2019 Aug 2;28(8):548-554. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.8.548.
4
Point-of-care fluorescence imaging predicts the presence of pathogenic bacteria in wounds: a clinical study.即时护理荧光成像预测伤口中病原菌的存在:一项临床研究。
J Wound Care. 2017 Aug 2;26(8):452-460. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.8.452.
5
[Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection].[滤纸法细菌检测对糖尿病足伤口感染诊断的意义]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 20;33(2):83-88. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.02.005.
6
Rapid Diagnosis of in Wounds with Point-Of-Care Fluorescence Imaing.即时护理荧光成像技术在伤口中的快速诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 11;11(2):280. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020280.
7
Real-time bacterial fluorescence imaging accurately identifies wounds with moderate-to-heavy bacterial burden.实时细菌荧光成像可准确识别细菌负荷为中度至重度的伤口。
J Wound Care. 2019 Jun 2;28(6):346-357. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.6.346.
8
Efficacy of an imaging device at identifying the presence of bacteria in wounds at a plastic surgery outpatients clinic.一种成像设备在整形外科门诊伤口细菌检测中的效能。
J Wound Care. 2018 Jan 2;27(1):20-26. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.1.20.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for the Detection of Bacterial Burden in Wounds: Results from the 350-Patient Fluorescence Imaging Assessment and Guidance Trial.即时荧光成像检测伤口细菌负荷的诊断准确性:来自 350 例患者的荧光成像评估和指导试验的结果。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Mar;10(3):123-136. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1272. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Fluorescence imaging guided dressing change frequency during negative pressure wound therapy: a case series.负压伤口治疗期间荧光成像引导的换药频率:病例系列
J Wound Care. 2019 Sep 1;28(Sup9):S28-S37. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup9.S28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Utility of Autofluorescence Imaging for Bacterial Detection in Wounds: A Systematic Review.自体荧光成像在伤口细菌检测中的临床应用:一项系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2025 Jun;22(6):e70678. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70678.