Boston University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States of America.
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Oct;144:106350. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106350. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
Communities across the U.S. have acted to eliminate or curb police presence in schools. These efforts have primarily focused on School Resource Officers. However, school staff also call upon local police to respond in their buildings, for example by calling 911. The reasons that police are called upon to respond in schools has rarely been studied.
The current study aimed to identify the primary reasons that local police were asked to respond to incidents in one urban school district, and the outcomes of those responses.
We analyzed 882 police incident report narratives, selected from a stratified sample of 57 schools in one urban school district during the 2017-18 school year. Incident reports, which were written by officers responding in schools, included narrative descriptions of officer intervention, the events precipitating police involvement, and outcomes of incidents.
By coding incident report narratives, we identified categories describing the reasons for police response to events in schools and the outcomes of those events.
Most incident reports originating from school addresses (n = 730; 82.8 %) involved students. Among those reports, police most frequently responded to instances of sexual physical violence (17.5 %), physical assault (15.8 %), dysregulated behavior (11.2 %), threatening language (10.8 %), and threat of or actual school violence (4.4 %). Incidents involving students most often resulted in: (1) parents/guardians being contacted (57.3 %), (2) schools engaging in disciplinary actions (39.7 %) or school safety actions (27.0 %), and (3) child maltreatment reports being made to Crimes Against Children (a subdivision of the police department focused on child maltreatment; 26.0 %) or to the Department of Children and Families (26.2 %).
Findings indicate that many events leading to police responses in schools are related to maltreatment and behavioral health. These events rarely result in a criminal justice response, and most often result in action by families and schools (e.g., contacting parents/guardians, school disciplinary/safety actions), and filed reports of maltreatment. Additional supports in these areas may have the potential to reduce the perceived need to call upon police and to provide more direct access to services for students.
美国各地的社区已经采取行动,以消除或限制警察在学校的存在。这些努力主要集中在学校资源官员上。然而,学校工作人员也会呼吁当地警察到他们的建筑物中做出回应,例如拨打 911。警察被要求在学校做出回应的原因很少被研究。
本研究旨在确定当地警察被要求对一个城市学区内的一起事件做出回应的主要原因,以及这些回应的结果。
我们分析了 2017-18 学年从一个城市学区的 57 所学校中分层抽样的 882 份警察事件报告叙述。这些事件报告是由在学校做出回应的警察撰写的,其中包括对警察干预的叙述描述、引发警察介入的事件,以及事件的结果。
通过对事件报告叙述进行编码,我们确定了描述警察对学校事件做出回应的原因以及这些事件结果的类别。
大多数来自学校地址的事件报告(n=730;82.8%)涉及学生。在这些报告中,警察最常回应的是性身体暴力(17.5%)、身体攻击(15.8%)、行为失调(11.2%)、威胁语言(10.8%)和实际或威胁学校暴力(4.4%)。涉及学生的事件最常导致:(1)联系家长/监护人(57.3%),(2)学校采取纪律行动(39.7%)或学校安全行动(27.0%),以及(3)向犯罪儿童部门(警察局内专门处理儿童虐待问题的分部;26.0%)或儿童和家庭部门(26.2%)提出儿童虐待报告。
研究结果表明,导致警察在学校做出回应的许多事件都与虐待和行为健康有关。这些事件很少导致刑事司法反应,而最常见的是家庭和学校采取行动(例如,联系家长/监护人,学校纪律/安全行动),并提出虐待报告。在这些领域增加支持可能有助于减少对警察的需求,并为学生提供更直接的服务。