Feasibility and outcome of third-generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with extra-large aortic annulus.

BACKGROUND

Many patients in need for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) present with an aortic annulus size larger than recommended by the manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU).

AIMS

To investigate procedural and short-term safety and efficacy of TAVI in patients with extra-large annuli (ELA).

METHODS

30-day clinical outcome and valve performance as defined by VARC 3 of 144 patients with an aortic annulus size exceeding the permitted range were compared to a propensity-score matched control cohort of patients with an aortic annulus size consistent with the IFU.

RESULTS

Area and perimeter was 730.4 ± 53.9 mm and 96.7 ± 6.5 mm in the ELA group. Technical (96.5% vs. 94.4%) and device success (82.3% vs. 84.5%) were comparable in patients with ELA (annulus area 730.4 ± 53.9 mm) and matched controls (annulus area 586.0 ± 48.2 mm). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rate, major intraprocedural complications, type 3 or 4 bleedings, major vascular complications, or stroke. Moderate paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurred more frequent in the ELA group (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.02). The rate of new pacemaker implantation was 7.0% in the ELA cohort and 15.0% in the control cohort, respectively (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of ELA patients with third-generation TAVI prostheses is feasible and safe, providing similar device success and complication rates as in matched controls with regular-sized aortic annulus. Post-interventional pacemaker implantation rates were low compared to the control group, yet incidence of moderate PVL remains problematic in ELA patients.