Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Aug 31;7(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad052.
Management of localized or recurrent prostate cancer since the 1990s has been based on risk stratification using clinicopathological variables, including Gleason score, T stage (based on digital rectal exam), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In this study a novel prognostic test, the Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier (GC), was used to stratify risk of prostate cancer progression in a US national database of men with prostate cancer.
Records of prostate cancer cases from participating SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program registries, diagnosed during the period from 2010 through 2018, were linked to records of testing with the GC prognostic test. Multivariable analysis was used to quantify the association between GC scores or risk groups and use of definitive local therapy after diagnosis in the GC biopsy-tested cohort and postoperative radiotherapy in the GC-tested cohort as well as adverse pathological findings after prostatectomy.
A total of 572 545 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 8927 patients underwent GC testing. GC biopsy-tested patients were more likely to undergo active active surveillance or watchful waiting than untested patients (odds ratio [OR] =2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.04 to 2.38, P < .001). The highest use of active surveillance or watchful waiting was for patients with a low-risk GC classification (41%) compared with those with an intermediate- (27%) or high-risk (11%) GC classification (P < .001). Among National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients with low and favorable-intermediate risk, higher GC risk class was associated with greater use of local therapy (OR = 4.79, 95% CI = 3.51 to 6.55, P < .001). Within this subset of patients who were subsequently treated with prostatectomy, high GC risk was associated with harboring adverse pathological findings (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.38 to 6.27, P = .005). Use of radiation after prostatectomy was statistically significantly associated with higher GC risk groups (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.89 to 3.84).
There is a strong association between use of the biopsy GC test and likelihood of conservative management. Higher genomic classifier scores are associated with higher rates of adverse pathology at time of surgery and greater use of postoperative radiotherapy.In this study the Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier (GC) was used to analyze a US national database of men with prostate cancer. Use of the GC was associated with conservative management (ie, active surveillance). Among men who had high-risk GC scores and then had surgery, there was a 3-fold higher chance of having worrisome findings in surgical specimens.
自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,局部或复发性前列腺癌的治疗一直基于使用临床病理变量(包括格里森评分、T 期(基于直肠指检)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA))进行风险分层。在这项研究中,一种新的预后检测方法,即 Decipher 前列腺基因组分类器(GC),用于对美国前列腺癌数据库中的前列腺癌患者进行风险分层。
从参与 SEER(监测、流行病学和最终结果)计划登记处的前列腺癌病例记录中,选择 2010 年至 2018 年期间诊断的病例,并与 GC 预后检测的检测记录相关联。使用多变量分析来量化 GC 评分或风险组与 GC 活检测试队列中确诊后进行确定性局部治疗以及 GC 测试队列中术后放疗以及前列腺切除术后不良病理发现之间的关联。
共纳入 572545 例患者进行分析,其中 8927 例患者接受了 GC 检测。GC 活检测试患者比未测试患者更有可能接受积极的主动监测或观察等待(比值比[OR] = 2.21,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.04 至 2.38,P < 0.001)。GC 分类最低风险的患者(41%)最有可能接受积极监测或观察等待,而 GC 分类中危(27%)或高危(11%)的患者(P < 0.001)。在国家综合癌症网络的低风险和有利中危患者中,GC 风险等级越高,局部治疗的使用就越多(OR = 4.79,95%CI = 3.51 至 6.55,P < 0.001)。在随后接受前列腺切除术治疗的这部分患者中,GC 风险较高与存在不良病理发现有关(OR = 2.94,95%CI = 1.38 至 6.27,P = 0.005)。前列腺切除术后使用放疗与更高的 GC 风险组具有统计学显著相关性(OR = 2.69,95%CI = 1.89 至 3.84)。
GC 活检检测的使用与保守治疗的可能性之间存在很强的关联。较高的基因组分类器评分与手术时出现不良病理的比例较高以及术后放疗的使用增加相关。在这项研究中,Decipher 前列腺基因组分类器(GC)用于分析美国前列腺癌数据库中的男性。GC 的使用与保守治疗(即主动监测)相关。在 GC 评分高风险且随后进行手术的男性中,手术标本中出现令人担忧的发现的几率增加了 3 倍。