• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在上肢行全厚断层皮片移植的严重烧伤患者中,一种替代阿片类药物的静脉内患者自控镇痛方法。

An alternative to opioid-based intravenous patient controlled analgesia in severe burn patients undergoing full thickness split graft in upper limbs.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Aug 1;58. doi: 10.2340/jphs.v58.12292.

DOI:10.2340/jphs.v58.12292
PMID:37525929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids provide good analgesic effect in burn patients during acute phase, but these patients may develop tolerance after prolonged exposure. Alternative analgesic strategies such as peripheral nerve blocks appear to provide adequate pain control while sparing opioid-related side effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB-PCA) in severe burn patients with relatively young age undergoing repeated debridement and large-area full thickness skin graft (FTSG).

METHODS

The records of victims in dust explosion in Taiwan in 2016 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Pain Service Database between 2016 June and 2017 December were evaluated. The patients' demographic data including age, gender, weight, burn area, degree of burn, type of PCA regimen (IV-PCA versus CPNB-PCA), size of FTSG, and adverse effects were collected.

RESULTS

The total in-hospital morphine consumption was significantly lower in CPNB-PCA than IV-PCA group. A trend of decrease in numerical rating scores (NRS) was observed for both groups and CPNB group had comparable NRS than IV-PCA group at rest. On movement, CPNB grouped had significantly lower NRS than IV-PCA on post-operative day 3.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that in patients requiring high dosage of opioid, CPNB may be a suitable alternative for pain control.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物在烧伤患者急性期提供良好的镇痛效果,但这些患者在长时间暴露后可能会产生耐受性。替代镇痛策略,如外周神经阻滞,似乎可以提供足够的疼痛控制,同时避免阿片类药物相关的副作用。本研究的目的是评估静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)和连续外周神经阻滞(CPNB-PCA)在接受反复清创和大面积全厚皮片移植(FTSG)的年轻严重烧伤患者中的效果。

方法

评估台湾长庚纪念医院疼痛服务数据库中 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 12 月间 2016 年尘爆事件中受害者的记录。收集患者的人口统计学数据,包括年龄、性别、体重、烧伤面积、烧伤程度、PCA 方案类型(IV-PCA 与 CPNB-PCA)、FTSG 大小和不良反应。

结果

CPNB-PCA 组的总住院吗啡消耗量明显低于 IV-PCA 组。两组的数字评分(NRS)均呈下降趋势,CPNB 组在休息时的 NRS 与 IV-PCA 组相当。在运动时,CPNB 组在术后第 3 天的 NRS 明显低于 IV-PCA 组。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于需要高剂量阿片类药物的患者,CPNB 可能是一种合适的替代镇痛方法。

相似文献

1
An alternative to opioid-based intravenous patient controlled analgesia in severe burn patients undergoing full thickness split graft in upper limbs.在上肢行全厚断层皮片移植的严重烧伤患者中,一种替代阿片类药物的静脉内患者自控镇痛方法。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Aug 1;58. doi: 10.2340/jphs.v58.12292.
2
Comparison of continuous nerve block versus patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain and outcome after talar and calcaneal fractures.距骨和跟骨骨折术后持续神经阻滞与患者自控镇痛对疼痛及预后的比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Nov;35(11):1116-21. doi: 10.1177/1071100714546640. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
3
[Quality of postoperative pain therapy: evaluation of an established anesthesiology acute pain service].[术后疼痛治疗质量:对一项成熟的麻醉科急性疼痛服务的评估]
Anaesthesist. 2013 Jun;62(6):453-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2177-7. Epub 2013 May 15.
4
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery.膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的股神经阻滞
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2.
5
The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil versus morphine anesthesia after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后静脉自控瑞芬太尼与吗啡麻醉的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):170-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
6
Patient-controlled analgesia for background pain of major burn injury.患者自控镇痛用于大面积烧伤患者的背景疼痛。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
Comparison of analgesic efficacy between rectus sheath blockade, intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine, and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective, observational clinical study.患者自控静脉镇痛与罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的镇痛效果比较:一项前瞻性、观察性临床研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01208-2.
8
[Postoperative pain management after minimally invasive hysterectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia].[微创子宫切除术后的疼痛管理:胸段硬膜外镇痛与静脉自控镇痛的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2013 Oct;62(10):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2234-2. Epub 2013 Sep 22.
9
A Retrospective Comparison of Three Patient-Controlled Analgesic Strategies: Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Plus Abdominal Wall Nerve Blocks versus Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Alone in Open Liver Surgery.三种患者自控镇痛策略的回顾性比较:静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛加腹壁神经阻滞与硬膜外镇痛及单纯静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛在开放性肝脏手术中的应用
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 27;10(10):2411. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102411.
10
Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non-patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain.患者自控阿片类镇痛与非患者自控阿片类镇痛用于术后疼痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD003348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Pain Management and Psychological Recovery in Earthquake Victims: The Role of Continuous Regional Analgesic Techniques Assessed by QoR-15.增强地震受害者的疼痛管理和心理恢复:通过QoR-15评估持续区域镇痛技术的作用。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;14(23):2678. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232678.