Suppr超能文献

超声活动评分对成人末端回肠克罗恩病的诊断性能与磁共振和组织学参考标准比较:来自 METRIC 试验的经验。

Diagnostic performance of sonographic activity scores for adult terminal ileal Crohn's disease compared to magnetic resonance and histological reference standards: experience from the METRIC trial.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London (UCL), 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, W1W 7TS, London, UK.

Department of Radiology, Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09958-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The simple ultrasound activity score for Crohn's disease (SUS-CD) and bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) are promising intestinal ultrasound (IUS) indices of CD, but studied mainly in small settings with few sonographers. We compared SUS-CD and BUSS against histological and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) reference standards in a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicentre, multireader trial.

METHODS

Participants recruited to the METRIC trial (ISRCTN03982913) were studied, including those with available terminal ileal (TI) biopsies. Sensitivity and specificity of SUS-CD and BUSS for TI CD activity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), from the prospective observations of the original METRIC trial sonographers against the histological activity index (HAI) and the simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (sMARIA).

RESULTS

We included 284 patients (median 31.5 years, IQR 23-46) from 8 centres, who underwent IUS and MRE. Of these, 111 patients had available terminal ileal biopsies with HAI scoring. Against histology, sensitivity and specificity for active disease were 79% (95% CI 69-86%) and 50% (31-69%) for SUS-CD, and 66% (56-75%) and 68% (47-84%) for BUSS, respectively. Compared to sMARIA, the sensitivity and specificity for active CD were 81% (74-86%) and 75% (66-83%) for SUS-CD, and 68% (61-74%) and 85% (76-91%) for BUSS, respectively. The sensitivity of SUS-CD was significantly greater than that of BUSS against HAI and sMARIA (p < 0.001), but its specificity was significantly lower than of BUSS against the MRE reference standard (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Particularly when compared to MRE activity scoring, SUS-CD and BUSS are promising tools in a real-world clinical setting.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When tested using data from a multicentre, multireader diagnostic accuracy trial, the simple ultrasound activity score for Crohn's disease (SUS-CD) and bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) were clinically viable intestinal ultrasound indices that were reasonably sensitive and specific for terminal ileal Crohn's disease, especially when compared to a magnetic resonance reference standard.

KEY POINTS

The simple ultrasound activity score for Crohn's disease and bowel ultrasound score are promising intestinal ultrasound indices of Crohn's disease but to date studied mainly in small settings with few sonographers. Compared to histology and the magnetic resonance reference standard in a multicentre, multireader setting, the sensitivity of simple ultrasound activity score for Crohn's disease is significantly greater than that of bowel ultrasound score. The specificity of simple ultrasound activity score for Crohn's disease was significantly lower than that of bowel ultrasound score compared to the magnetic resonance enterography reference standard. The specificity of both indices was numerically higher when the magnetic resonance enterography reference standard was adopted.

摘要

目的

克罗恩病简单超声活动评分(SUS-CD)和肠超声评分(BUSS)是有前途的克罗恩病肠道超声(IUS)指标,但主要在有少数超声医师的小环境中进行研究。我们在后验分析一项前瞻性多中心、多读者试验中,将 SUS-CD 和 BUSS 与组织学和磁共振肠造影术(MRE)参考标准进行了比较。

方法

对参与 METRIC 试验(ISRCTN03982913)的参与者进行了研究,包括那些有可用的末端回肠(TI)活检的参与者。根据原始 METRIC 试验超声医师对组织学活动指数(HAI)和简化磁共振活动指数(sMARIA)的前瞻性观察,使用 95%置信区间(CI)计算 SUS-CD 和 BUSS 对 TI CD 活动的敏感性和特异性。

结果

我们纳入了来自 8 个中心的 284 名患者(中位数 31.5 岁,IQR 23-46),这些患者接受了 IUS 和 MRE 检查。其中,111 名患者有可用的末端回肠活检标本进行 HAI 评分。与组织学相比,SUS-CD 对活动期疾病的敏感性和特异性分别为 79%(69-86%)和 50%(31-69%),BUSS 分别为 66%(56-75%)和 68%(47-84%)。与 sMARIA 相比,SUS-CD 对活动期 CD 的敏感性和特异性分别为 81%(74-86%)和 75%(66-83%),BUSS 分别为 68%(61-74%)和 85%(76-91%)。SUS-CD 的敏感性明显大于 BUSS 对 HAI 和 sMARIA 的敏感性(p<0.001),但其特异性明显低于 BUSS 对 MRE 参考标准的特异性(p=0.003)。

结论

特别是与 MRE 活动评分相比,SUS-CD 和 BUSS 在现实临床环境中是有前途的工具。

临床相关性声明

在多中心、多读者诊断准确性试验的数据中进行测试时,克罗恩病简单超声活动评分(SUS-CD)和肠超声评分(BUSS)是可行的肠道超声指标,对末端回肠克罗恩病具有合理的敏感性和特异性,特别是与磁共振参考标准相比。

关键点

克罗恩病简单超声活动评分和肠超声评分是有前途的克罗恩病肠道超声指标,但迄今为止主要在有少数超声医师的小环境中进行研究。在多中心、多读者环境中,与组织学和磁共振参考标准相比,克罗恩病简单超声活动评分的敏感性明显大于肠超声评分。与磁共振肠造影术参考标准相比,克罗恩病简单超声活动评分的特异性明显低于肠超声评分。采用磁共振肠造影术参考标准时,两个指标的特异性均略有升高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dce/10791915/e4b4050d88ce/330_2023_9958_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验