• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methods for determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: a protocol for a scoping review.确定最佳呼气末正压的方法:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):e071871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071871.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Methods for determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: a scoping review.确定接受有创机械通气患者最佳呼气末正压的方法:范围综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;71(11):1535-1555. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02871-6. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
What is known about the LGBTQ perspective in child welfare services? A scoping review protocol.关于儿童福利服务中 LGBTQ 群体的观点,我们了解多少?一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 8;9(9):e030675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030675.
7
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.一项关于生物医学期刊稿件评审过程中同行评审员角色和任务的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468.
8
Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping review.识别重症医学中的低价值临床实践:一项范围综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 28;5(10):e008244. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008244.
9
Facilitators and barriers to codesigning social robots with older adults with dementia: a scoping review protocol.促进和阻碍与痴呆症老年患者共同设计社交机器人的因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e080751. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080751.
10
Scoping review of review methodologies used for guiding evidence-based practice in critical care: a protocol.综述方法学在重症监护循证实践指导中的应用评价:方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e082661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082661.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: a scoping review.确定接受有创机械通气患者最佳呼气末正压的方法:范围综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;71(11):1535-1555. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02871-6. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The web-based "Right Review" tool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 knowledge synthesis methods.基于网络的“正确评审”工具会向评审人员提出简单问题,以从41种知识综合方法中推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;147:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Association of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Lung Recruitment Selection Strategies with Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.呼气末正压和肺复张选择策略与急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的关联:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;205(11):1300-1310. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202108-1972OC.
3
Setting and Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.设置和滴定呼气末正压
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1566-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.052. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Protective Ventilation Strategies for Moderate and Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Network Meta-Analysis.保护性通气策略对中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较。一项网状荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;203(11):1366-1377. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3039OC.
5
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
6
The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non-English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews.谷歌翻译从非英语语言试验中提取数据用于系统评价的准确性。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):677-679. doi: 10.7326/M19-0891. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
8
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高呼气末正压(PEEP)与低呼气末正压策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S297-S303. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-338OT.
9
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.美国胸科学会/欧洲危重病医学会/重症医学学会机械通气临床实践指南:急性呼吸窘迫综合征成人患者机械通气。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1253-1263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST.
10
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

确定最佳呼气末正压的方法:系统评价方案。

Methods for determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: a protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):e071871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071871.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071871
PMID:37527894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10401233/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Titrated application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is an important part of any mechanical ventilation strategy. However, the method by which the optimal PEEP is determined and titrated varies widely. Methods for determining optimal PEEP have been assessed using a variety of different study designs and patient populations. We will conduct a scoping review to systematically identify all methods for determining optimal PEEP, and to identify the patient populations, outcomes measured and study designs used for each method. The goal will be to identify gaps in the optimal PEEP literature and identify areas where there may be an opportunity to further systematically synthesise and meta-analyse existing literature.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using scoping review methodology, we will generate a comprehensive search strategy based on inclusion and exclusion criteria generated using the population, concept, context framework. Five different databases will be searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus). Three investigators will independently screen titles and abstracts, and two investigators will independently complete full-text review and data extraction. Included citations will be categorised in terms of PEEP method, study design, patient population and outcomes measured. The methods for PEEP titration will be described in detail, including strengths and limitations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Given this is a synthesis of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated to stakeholders via presentation at local, regional and national levels, as well as publication in a high-impact critical care journal. There is also the potential to impact local clinical care protocols and inform broader clinical practice guidelines undertaken by societies.

摘要

简介

滴定呼气末正压(PEEP)的应用是任何机械通气策略的重要组成部分。然而,确定和滴定最佳 PEEP 的方法差异很大。已经使用各种不同的研究设计和患者人群评估了确定最佳 PEEP 的方法。我们将进行范围综述,以系统地确定所有确定最佳 PEEP 的方法,并确定用于每种方法的患者人群、测量的结果和研究设计。目标是确定最佳 PEEP 文献中的差距,并确定可能有机会进一步系统地综合和荟萃分析现有文献的领域。

方法和分析

使用范围综述方法,我们将根据使用人群、概念、背景框架生成的纳入和排除标准生成全面的搜索策略。将搜索五个不同的数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 Scopus)。三名调查员将独立筛选标题和摘要,两名调查员将独立完成全文审查和数据提取。纳入的引文将根据 PEEP 方法、研究设计、患者人群和测量的结果进行分类。将详细描述 PEEP 滴定方法,包括优点和局限性。

伦理和传播

鉴于这是对现有文献的综合,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过在本地、区域和国家各级进行演示以及在高影响力的重症监护期刊上发表来传播给利益相关者。还有可能影响当地的临床护理协议,并为社会开展的更广泛的临床实践指南提供信息。