Suppr超能文献

确定最佳呼气末正压的方法:系统评价方案。

Methods for determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: a protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):e071871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071871.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Titrated application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is an important part of any mechanical ventilation strategy. However, the method by which the optimal PEEP is determined and titrated varies widely. Methods for determining optimal PEEP have been assessed using a variety of different study designs and patient populations. We will conduct a scoping review to systematically identify all methods for determining optimal PEEP, and to identify the patient populations, outcomes measured and study designs used for each method. The goal will be to identify gaps in the optimal PEEP literature and identify areas where there may be an opportunity to further systematically synthesise and meta-analyse existing literature.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using scoping review methodology, we will generate a comprehensive search strategy based on inclusion and exclusion criteria generated using the population, concept, context framework. Five different databases will be searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus). Three investigators will independently screen titles and abstracts, and two investigators will independently complete full-text review and data extraction. Included citations will be categorised in terms of PEEP method, study design, patient population and outcomes measured. The methods for PEEP titration will be described in detail, including strengths and limitations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Given this is a synthesis of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated to stakeholders via presentation at local, regional and national levels, as well as publication in a high-impact critical care journal. There is also the potential to impact local clinical care protocols and inform broader clinical practice guidelines undertaken by societies.

摘要

简介

滴定呼气末正压(PEEP)的应用是任何机械通气策略的重要组成部分。然而,确定和滴定最佳 PEEP 的方法差异很大。已经使用各种不同的研究设计和患者人群评估了确定最佳 PEEP 的方法。我们将进行范围综述,以系统地确定所有确定最佳 PEEP 的方法,并确定用于每种方法的患者人群、测量的结果和研究设计。目标是确定最佳 PEEP 文献中的差距,并确定可能有机会进一步系统地综合和荟萃分析现有文献的领域。

方法和分析

使用范围综述方法,我们将根据使用人群、概念、背景框架生成的纳入和排除标准生成全面的搜索策略。将搜索五个不同的数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 Scopus)。三名调查员将独立筛选标题和摘要,两名调查员将独立完成全文审查和数据提取。纳入的引文将根据 PEEP 方法、研究设计、患者人群和测量的结果进行分类。将详细描述 PEEP 滴定方法,包括优点和局限性。

伦理和传播

鉴于这是对现有文献的综合,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过在本地、区域和国家各级进行演示以及在高影响力的重症监护期刊上发表来传播给利益相关者。还有可能影响当地的临床护理协议,并为社会开展的更广泛的临床实践指南提供信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Setting and Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.设置和滴定呼气末正压
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1566-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.052. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验