• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急救人员对在监督注射设施附近工作的态度:与倦怠、二次创伤压力及同情满足的关系。

First Responder Attitudes Regarding Working Near a Supervised Injection Facility: Relationship to Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction.

机构信息

Baylor Scott & White Research Institute.

Baylor University.

出版信息

Workplace Health Saf. 2023 Nov;71(11):543-550. doi: 10.1177/21650799231188364. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1177/21650799231188364
PMID:37530030
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency responders are the most frequent overdose responders, however, little is known about the impact of supervised injection facility (SIF) location on first responders. The purpose of this study was to determine whether firefighter/paramedic attitudes about being stationed near an SIF were related to burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction.

METHODS

Firefighter/paramedics from Vancouver Fire and Rescue Services ( = 54) completed an online survey. General linear models were used to assess differences in burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction based on attitudes regarding being stationed near an SIF while controlling for occupational stress.

FINDINGS

Firefighters with negative attitudes regarding station placement near an SIF experienced more burnout compared with those with neutral/mixed attitudes and less compassion satisfaction compared with those with positive attitudes. There were no differences between those with positive and neutral/mixed attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have implications for education and training of emergency responders stationed near SIFs. They also highlight the need for more research into the effects of and possible clinical opportunities needed to support first responders' work near an SIF.

APPLICATION TO PRACTICE

While these findings represent early exploratory evidence, increased burnout and reduced compassion satisfaction may be common reactions among first responders who experience negative attitudes toward SIFs. Prevention efforts could incorporate programs to enhance health and well-being of first responders and education regarding substance use and harm reduction, while workforce surveillance for signs of distress or burnout could be implemented to trigger additional mental health services and interventions. while policymakers should remain aware of SIF-related impacts on all stakeholders, including first responders.

摘要

背景

急救人员是最常见的过量用药急救人员,然而,对于监督注射设施(SIF)的位置对急救人员的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定消防员/护理人员对驻留在 SIF 附近的态度是否与倦怠、二次创伤性压力和同情心满足感有关。

方法

温哥华消防和救援服务处的消防员/护理人员(n = 54)完成了一项在线调查。使用一般线性模型,在控制职业压力的情况下,根据对驻留在 SIF 附近的态度评估倦怠、二次创伤性压力和同情心满足感的差异。

结果

对驻留在 SIF 附近的位置持消极态度的消防员与持中立/混合态度的消防员相比,倦怠感更严重,与持积极态度的消防员相比,同情心满足感更低。持积极态度和中立/混合态度的消防员之间没有差异。

结论

这些发现对驻留在 SIF 附近的急救人员的教育和培训具有影响。它们还强调了需要更多研究来支持急救人员在 SIF 附近工作的影响和可能需要的临床机会。

应用实践

虽然这些发现代表了早期的探索性证据,但对 SIF 持负面态度的急救人员可能会出现倦怠感增加和同情心满足感降低等常见反应。预防措施可以包括增强急救人员健康和幸福感的计划,以及关于药物使用和减少伤害的教育,同时可以实施劳动力监测,以发现压力或倦怠的迹象,从而触发额外的心理健康服务和干预措施。同时,政策制定者应始终意识到 SIF 对所有利益相关者的相关影响,包括急救人员。

相似文献

1
First Responder Attitudes Regarding Working Near a Supervised Injection Facility: Relationship to Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction.急救人员对在监督注射设施附近工作的态度:与倦怠、二次创伤压力及同情满足的关系。
Workplace Health Saf. 2023 Nov;71(11):543-550. doi: 10.1177/21650799231188364. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction Among Emergency Nurses in Southern California Working Through the COVID-19 Pandemic.南加州新冠疫情期间急诊科护士职业耗竭、二次创伤压力及职业共情满意度的横断面分析。
J Emerg Nurs. 2022 Jul;48(4):366-375.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among Chinese midwives working in the delivery room: A cross-sectional survey.中国产房助产士职业耗竭及职业满足感的横断面调查。
Midwifery. 2022 Oct;113:103427. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103427. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Compassion Satisfaction, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Burnout among Nurses Working in Trauma Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study.创伤中心护士的共情满足、二次创伤应激和职业倦怠:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147228.
5
Working near a supervised injection facility: A qualitative study of perspectives of firefighter-emergency medical responders.在监督注射设施附近工作:消防员-紧急医疗救援人员观点的定性研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Apr;64(4):296-300. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23224. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Individual and organizational factors associated with professional quality of life in Florida fire personnel.佛罗里达消防人员职业生活质量的个体因素与组织因素
J Emerg Manag. 2018 May/Jun;16(3):173-182. doi: 10.5055/jem.2018.0366.
7
Identifying compassion satisfaction, burnout, & traumatic stress in Children's Advocacy Centers.识别儿童倡导中心中的同情满足、倦怠和创伤应激。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 3):104240. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104240. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
8
Exploring key job demands and resources in Norwegian child mental health services: a cross-sectional study of associations with and relationship between compassion satisfaction, burnout, secondary traumatic stress and turnover intention.探索挪威儿童心理健康服务中的关键工作要求和资源:一项横断面研究,探讨同情心满足、倦怠、二次创伤应激与离职意愿之间的关联和关系。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;12:1304345. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1304345. eCollection 2024.
9
Prevalence and predictors of compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout among Chinese hospice nurses: A cross-sectional study.中国临终关怀护士同情满足感、二次创伤应激和职业倦怠的流行率及其预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Feb;69:151648. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151648. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
10
The Role of Emotion Regulation as a Potential Mediator between Secondary Traumatic Stress, Burnout, and Compassion Satisfaction in Professionals Working in the Forced Migration Field.情绪调节在强迫性迁移领域专业人员的二次创伤压力、倦怠和同情满足感之间的潜在中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2266. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032266.