• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国沃特森肿瘤分析系统和临床医生为乳腺癌患者提供的治疗建议:单中心经验。

Analysis of Watson for oncology and clinicians' treatment recommendations for patients with breast cancer in Korea: A single center experience.

机构信息

Busan Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Indian J Cancer. 2023 Apr-Jun;60(2):211-216. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_109_20.

DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_109_20
PMID:37530243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various clinical applications have been attempted using artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support system (CDSS), and it has become a starting point for personalized cancer treatment. We aimed to identify the degree of agreement between the AI-CDSS, Watson for Oncology (WFO), and the clinician in treatment recommendations for Korean breast cancer patients and to provide guidelines for future improvement.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three breast cancer patients who underwent treatment at the Pusan National University Hospital between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2017 were enrolled in this study. The concordance between WFO's and clinicians' treatment recommendations were examined according to various factors.

RESULTS

WFO gave the same treatment option recommendations as clinicians in 74 (40.4%) of the cases. According to the logistic regression, the difference in recommendation concordance between stage I and stage III was statistically significant (P = 0.004), and there was no difference among other factors.

CONCLUSION

The concordance of treatment recommendations was low overall. However, this is largely attributable to the differences of medical insurance system and healthcare environment between the United States and Korea. In the future, region-specific features should be considered or reflected during the development of AI-CDSS.

摘要

背景

各种临床应用已经尝试使用人工智能(AI)临床决策支持系统(CDSS),它已成为个性化癌症治疗的起点。我们旨在确定 AI-CDSS、Watson for Oncology(WFO)与临床医生在韩国乳腺癌患者治疗建议中的一致性程度,并为未来的改进提供指导。

方法

本研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 5 月 31 日期间在釜山国立大学医院接受治疗的 183 名乳腺癌患者。根据各种因素,检查了 WFO 和临床医生治疗建议的一致性。

结果

WFO 在 74 例(40.4%)中给出了与临床医生相同的治疗方案建议。根据逻辑回归,分期 I 和分期 III 之间的推荐一致性差异具有统计学意义(P=0.004),其他因素之间没有差异。

结论

总体而言,治疗建议的一致性较低。然而,这主要归因于美国和韩国之间医疗保险制度和医疗保健环境的差异。未来,在开发 AI-CDSS 时,应考虑或反映特定地区的特点。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Watson for oncology and clinicians' treatment recommendations for patients with breast cancer in Korea: A single center experience.韩国沃特森肿瘤分析系统和临床医生为乳腺癌患者提供的治疗建议:单中心经验。
Indian J Cancer. 2023 Apr-Jun;60(2):211-216. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_109_20.
2
Watson for Oncology and breast cancer treatment recommendations: agreement with an expert multidisciplinary tumor board. Watson for Oncology 与乳腺癌治疗推荐:与专家多学科肿瘤委员会的一致性。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):418-423. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx781.
3
Adequacy and Effectiveness of Watson For Oncology in the Treatment of Thyroid Carcinoma.沃森肿瘤解决方案在甲状腺癌治疗中的充分性和有效性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 3;12:585364. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.585364. eCollection 2021.
4
Concordance between treatment recommendations provided by IBM Watson for Oncology and a multidisciplinary tumor board for breast cancer in China.IBM Watson 肿瘤解决方案为中国乳腺癌患者提供的治疗建议与多学科肿瘤委员会建议的一致性。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 4;50(8):852-858. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa051.
5
Concordance Study Between IBM Watson for Oncology and Clinical Practice for Patients with Cancer in China.IBM Watson 肿瘤解决方案在中国癌症患者中的临床应用一致性研究。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):812-819. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0255. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Assessing Concordance With Watson for Oncology, a Cognitive Computing Decision Support System for Colon Cancer Treatment in Korea.评估韩国用于结肠癌治疗的认知计算决策支持系统——沃森肿瘤学的一致性。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-8. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00109.
7
Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations.沃森肿瘤学早期经验:用于前列腺癌治疗建议的临床决策支持系统
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03214-y. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
8
Early experience with Watson for oncology in Korean patients with colorectal cancer.韩国结直肠癌患者使用 Watson for Oncology 的早期经验。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 25;14(3):e0213640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213640. eCollection 2019.
9
Concordance assessment of Watson for Oncology in breast cancer chemotherapy: first China experience.乳腺癌化疗中Watson肿瘤学系统的一致性评估:中国首例经验
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(2):389-401. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.01.34.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making for Colorectal Cancer Treatment Strategy: An Observational Study of Implementing Watson for Oncology in a 250-Case Cohort.人工智能在结直肠癌治疗策略决策中的应用:对250例病例队列实施肿瘤学沃森系统的观察性研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;10:594182. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.594182. eCollection 2020.