• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost of implementing the QualityRights programme in public hospitals in Gujarat providing mental healthcare.在古吉拉特邦的公立医院实施提供精神保健服务的 QualityRights 项目的成本。
Indian J Med Res. 2023 Jun;157(6):524-532. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2449_19.
2
Systematic evaluation of the QualityRights programme in public mental health facilities in Gujarat, India.对印度古吉拉特邦公共精神卫生设施中“质量权利”项目的系统评估。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;218(4):196-203. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.138.
3
Cost of delivering secondary-level health care services through public sector district hospitals in India.印度通过公立区医院提供二级卫生保健服务的成本。
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Sep;146(3):354-361. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_902_15.
4
Severity and costs associated with hospitalization for dengue in public and private hospitals of Surat city, Gujarat, India, 2017-2018.2017 - 2018年印度古吉拉特邦苏拉特市公立和私立医院登革热住院治疗的严重程度及费用
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Nov 1;113(11):661-669. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trz057.
5
The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: the impact of phased implementation.肯尼亚成本分担政策的起伏:分阶段实施的影响
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):52-63. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.52.
6
Estimating the cost of interventions to improve water, sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities across India.估算改善印度医疗卫生机构水、环境卫生和个人卫生的干预措施成本。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003045.
7
Cost and efficiency of public sector sexually transmitted infection clinics in Andhra Pradesh, India.印度安得拉邦公共部门性传播感染诊所的成本与效率
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Nov 5;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-69.
8
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
9
Cost of Delivering Health Care Services in Public Sector Primary and Community Health Centres in North India.印度北部公立部门初级和社区卫生中心提供医疗保健服务的成本
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160986. eCollection 2016.
10
Costing analysis of an information & communications technology-enabled primary healthcare facility in India.印度基于信息通信技术的基层医疗设施成本分析。
Indian J Med Res. 2023 Apr;157(4):231-238. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_454_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting quality mental healthcare across India: The potential of the QualityRights programme.在印度推广优质精神卫生保健:“质量权利”项目的潜力。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Aug;160(2):176-178. doi: 10.25259/ijmr_1466_23.
2
Mental Health Professionals' Perception of Respect for Human Rights and Organizational Well-Being in Three Countries of South America.心理健康专业人员对南美洲三个国家的人权尊重和组织福利的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;21(2):214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020214.

本文引用的文献

1
Atmiyata, a community-led intervention to address common mental disorders: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Gujarat, India.Atmiyata,一项以社区为基础的干预措施,旨在解决常见精神障碍问题:在印度古吉拉特邦农村地区进行的一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4133-6.
2
Systematic evaluation of the QualityRights programme in public mental health facilities in Gujarat, India.对印度古吉拉特邦公共精神卫生设施中“质量权利”项目的系统评估。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;218(4):196-203. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.138.
3
Cost-effectiveness of glaucoma screening in cataract camps versus opportunistic and passive screening in urban India: A study protocol.印度城市地区白内障防治营中青光眼筛查与机会性及被动筛查的成本效益:一项研究方案
F1000Res. 2019 Jan 14;8:53. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17582.3. eCollection 2019.
4
WHO QualityRights: transforming mental health services.世界卫生组织《质量权利:转变精神卫生服务》
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;4(11):826-827. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30271-7. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
Human Rights-Based Approaches to Mental Health: A Review of Programs.基于人权的心理健康方法:项目综述
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun;18(1):263-276.
6
Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis.扩大抑郁症和焦虑症治疗规模:一项全球投资回报率分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 May;3(5):415-24. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30024-4. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
Costs and financing of routine immunization: Approach and selected findings of a multi-country study (EPIC).常规免疫的成本与筹资:多国研究(EPIC)的方法与部分研究结果
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.066.
8
Unit cost of medical services at different hospitals in India.印度不同医院的医疗服务单位成本。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e69728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069728. Print 2013.
9
World Health Assembly adopts Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020.世界卫生大会通过《2013-2020年综合精神卫生行动计划》。
Lancet. 2013 Jun 8;381(9882):1970-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61139-3.
10
Cost analysis for efficient management: diabetes treatment at a public district hospital in Thailand.高效管理的成本分析:泰国某公立地区医院的糖尿病治疗
Int J Pharm Pract. 2011 Oct;19(5):342-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00131.x. Epub 2011 May 23.

在古吉拉特邦的公立医院实施提供精神保健服务的 QualityRights 项目的成本。

Cost of implementing the QualityRights programme in public hospitals in Gujarat providing mental healthcare.

机构信息

Department of Research, George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi; Department of Public Health, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka; Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2023 Jun;157(6):524-532. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2449_19.

DOI:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2449_19
PMID:37530307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10466489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Investment in mental health is quite meagre worldwide, including in India. The costs of new interventions must be clarified to ensure the appropriate utilization of available resources. The government of Gujarat implemented QualityRights intervention at six public mental health hospitals. This study was aimed to project the costs of scaling up of the Gujarat QualityRights intervention to understand the additional resources needed for a broader implementation.

METHODS

Economic costs of the QualityRights intervention were calculated using an ingredients-based approach from the health systems' perspective. Major activities within the QualityRights intervention included assessment visits, meetings, training of trainers, provision of peer support and onsite training.

RESULTS

Total costs of implementing the QualityRights intervention varied from Indian Rupees (₹) 0.59 million to ₹ 2.59 million [1United States Dollars (US $) = ₹ 74.132] across six intervention sites at 2020 prices with 69-79 per cent of the cost being time cost. Scaling up the intervention to the entire State of Gujarat would require about two per cent increase in financial investment, or about 7.5 per cent increase in total cost including time costs over and above the costs of usual care for people with mental health conditions in public health facilities across the State.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that human resources were the major cost contributor of the programme. Given the shortage of trained human resources in the mental health sector, appropriate planning during the scale-up phase of the QualityRights intervention is required to ensure all staff members receive the required training, and the treatment is not compromised during this training phase. As only about two per cent increase in financial cost can improve the quality of mental healthcare significantly, the State government can plan for its scale-up across the State.

摘要

背景与目的

全球,包括印度在内,对精神卫生的投资都相当微薄。为确保合理利用现有资源,必须明确新干预措施的成本。古吉拉特邦政府在六家公立精神卫生医院实施了 QualityRights 干预措施。本研究旨在预测 QualityRights 干预措施扩大规模的成本,以了解更广泛实施所需的额外资源。

方法

从卫生系统的角度出发,采用基于成分的方法计算 QualityRights 干预措施的经济成本。QualityRights 干预措施中的主要活动包括评估访问、会议、培训师培训、提供同伴支持和现场培训。

结果

以 2020 年的价格计算,在六个干预点,实施 QualityRights 干预措施的总成本从 59 万印度卢比(₹)到 259 万印度卢比(₹)不等,其中 69-79%的成本为时间成本。将该干预措施扩大到古吉拉特邦全境,需要在财务投资上增加约 2%,或在总成本上增加约 7.5%,包括全州公共卫生设施中精神卫生条件患者的常规护理成本以外的时间成本。

结论

本研究结果表明,人力资源是该项目的主要成本贡献者。鉴于精神卫生部门受过培训的人力资源短缺,在 QualityRights 干预措施扩大规模阶段需要进行适当规划,以确保所有工作人员都接受所需的培训,并且在培训阶段治疗不会受到影响。由于仅增加约 2%的财务成本就可以显著提高精神卫生保健的质量,州政府可以计划在全州范围内扩大该措施的规模。