Department of Social Policy Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):234-245. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad061.
Chronic pain and depression are highly comorbid, but the lack of consensus on the best treatment strategies puts patients at high risk of suboptimal care-coordination as well as health and social complications. Therefore, this study aims to quantitatively assesses how effective different primary care interventions have been in treating the comorbid state of chronic pain and depression. In particular, this study evaluates both short-term outcomes-based specifically on measures of chronic pain and depression during an intervention itself-and long-term outcomes or measures of pain and depression in the months after conclusion of the formal study intervention.
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with concurrent chronic pain and depression. Intensity and severity of pain and depression symptoms were the primary outcomes. The main inclusion criteria were RCTs that: (i) enrolled patients diagnosed with depression and chronic pain, (ii) occurred in primary care settings, (iii) reported baseline and post-intervention outcomes for chronic pain and depression, (iv) lasted at least 8 weeks, and (v) used clinically validated outcome measures. Risk of bias was appraised with the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and GRADE guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of evidence.
Of 692 screened citations, 7 multicomponent primary care interventions tested across 891 patients were included. Meta-analyses revealed significant improvements in depression at post-intervention (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI [0.17, 0.71], P = 0.0014) and follow-up (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.01, 0.81], P = 0.0448). Non-significant effects were observed for chronic pain at post-intervention (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.61], P = 0.1287) and follow-up (SMD = 0.13, 95% CI [-0.3, 0.56], P = 0.5432).
Based on the results of the meta-analysis, primary care interventions largely yielded small to moderate positive effects for depressive symptoms and no significant effects on pain. In one study, stepped-care to be more effective in treatment of comorbid chronic pain and depression than other interventions both during the intervention and upon post-intervention follow-up. As such, depression appears more amenable to treatment than pain, but the number of published RCTs assessing both conditions is limited. More research is needed to further develop optimal treatment strategies.
慢性疼痛和抑郁高度共病,但缺乏最佳治疗策略的共识,使患者面临治疗协调不佳以及健康和社会并发症的高风险。因此,本研究旨在定量评估不同初级保健干预措施治疗慢性疼痛和抑郁共病状态的效果。特别是,本研究评估了短期(具体基于干预本身期间慢性疼痛和抑郁的测量)和长期(在正式研究干预结束后的几个月内疼痛和抑郁的测量)结果。
这是一项针对同时患有慢性疼痛和抑郁的患者的随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。疼痛和抑郁症状的强度和严重程度是主要结果。主要纳入标准是:(i)纳入诊断为抑郁和慢性疼痛的患者,(ii)发生在初级保健环境中,(iii)报告慢性疼痛和抑郁的基线和干预后结果,(iv)持续至少 8 周,以及(v)使用临床验证的结果测量。使用风险偏倚 2 工具评估风险偏倚,并使用 GRADE 指南评估证据质量。
在 692 条筛选引文中,有 7 项多成分初级保健干预措施在 891 名患者中进行了测试。荟萃分析显示,干预后抑郁有显著改善(SMD=0.44,95%CI[0.17,0.71],P=0.0014)和随访(SMD=0.41,95%CI[0.01,0.81],P=0.0448)。干预后慢性疼痛无显著影响(SMD=0.27,95%CI[-0.08,0.61],P=0.1287)和随访(SMD=0.13,95%CI[-0.3,0.56],P=0.5432)。
基于荟萃分析的结果,初级保健干预措施对抑郁症状的影响主要是小到中度的积极影响,对疼痛没有显著影响。在一项研究中,阶梯式护理在干预期间和干预后随访期间对慢性疼痛和抑郁的共病治疗比其他干预措施更有效。因此,与疼痛相比,抑郁似乎更容易治疗,但评估两种疾病的已发表 RCT 数量有限。需要进一步开展更多的研究以进一步制定最佳治疗策略。