• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版临床实用抑郁结局量表在重性抑郁障碍患者中的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the Chinese version of the clinically useful depression outcome scale in patients with major depressive disorder.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 2;11(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01255-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01255-7
PMID:37533105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398914/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) in the Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 283 patients with MDD (69% females). The Rasch model was applied to examine the overall fit of the Chinese version of CUDOS and the fit of the 18 items. Dimensionality, item-model fit, differential item functioning (DIF), reliability, ordering of response category and targeting were tested to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CUDOS.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis demonstrated the unidimensionality of the Chinese version of CUDOS. Of the 18 items, three items (item 4, item 5, item 6) showed misfit in the model. After merging item 4 into item 3 and item 6 into item 5, the overall model fit improved. The person separation index (PSI) was 3.0 and the person reliability coefficient was 0.90. No evidence of significant DIF was found when associated with gender and age. No disordered category and threshold of the rating response were observed, which meant the response category setting was reasonable. The mean ability of person was - 0.53.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that the Chinese version of CUDOS has acceptable psychometric properties. In order to improve the quality and applicability of the Chinese version of CUDOS, the merging of item 4 into item 3 and item 6 into item 5 are suggested.

摘要

目的

使用 Rasch 分析检验中文版临床抑郁结局量表(CUDOS)在中国大陆重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中的心理计量学特性。

方法

该样本包括 283 名 MDD 患者(69%为女性)。应用 Rasch 模型检验 CUDOS 中文版的整体拟合度以及 18 个项目的拟合度。检验维度、项目-模型拟合、差异项目功能(DIF)、信度、反应类别排序和目标设定,以检验 CUDOS 中文版的心理计量学特性。

结果

Rasch 分析表明 CUDOS 中文版具有单维性。在 18 个项目中,有 3 个项目(项目 4、项目 5、项目 6)在模型中不拟合。将项目 4 合并到项目 3 中,将项目 6 合并到项目 5 中后,整体模型拟合度得到改善。个体分离指数(PSI)为 3.0,个体可靠性系数为 0.90。在与性别和年龄相关时,未发现明显的 DIF 证据。未观察到分类紊乱和评分反应的阈值,这意味着反应类别设置合理。个体的平均能力为-0.53。

结论

研究结果表明,CUDOS 中文版具有可接受的心理计量学特性。为了提高 CUDOS 中文版的质量和适用性,建议将项目 4 合并到项目 3 中,将项目 6 合并到项目 5 中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/d1884bbaed7d/40359_2023_1255_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/720ed05e55b2/40359_2023_1255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/692a62e2bab2/40359_2023_1255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/d55b5081ccc7/40359_2023_1255_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/d1884bbaed7d/40359_2023_1255_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/720ed05e55b2/40359_2023_1255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/692a62e2bab2/40359_2023_1255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/d55b5081ccc7/40359_2023_1255_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3fe/10398914/d1884bbaed7d/40359_2023_1255_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rasch analysis of the Chinese version of the clinically useful depression outcome scale in patients with major depressive disorder.中文版临床实用抑郁结局量表在重性抑郁障碍患者中的 Rasch 分析。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 2;11(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01255-7.
2
Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.使用拉施模型进行项目分析对荷兰版吞咽生活质量问卷(DSWAL-QoL)及调整后的DSWAL-QoL(aDSWAL-QoL)进行验证:一项试点研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 7;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0639-3.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.《用于重度抑郁症患者的临床实用抑郁结果量表中文版的心理测量学特性》
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Jul 21;17:2387-2395. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S307662. eCollection 2021.
5
Psychometric properties of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale supplemented with DSM-5 Mixed subtype questionnaire in Chinese patients with mood disorders.心境障碍患者补充 DSM-5 混合亚型问卷的临床有效抑郁结局量表的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.117. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care.《重度抑郁量表的结构效度:初级保健中自评量表的拉施分析》
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jun;97:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
7
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CUDOS-M in patients with mood disorders: A multicenter study across China.中文版 CUDOS-M 在心境障碍患者中的信度和效度:一项中国多中心研究。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:723-729. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
8
Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders.Rasch 验证丹麦版肩痛与上肢功能障碍指数(SPADI)在肩袖相关疾病患者中的应用。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2052-8. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Reliability and validity of a self-report scale for daily assessments of the severity of depressive symptoms.用于日常评估抑郁症状严重程度的自报量表的信度和效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
10
Cross-cultural validity of the Spanish version of PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women: a Rasch item response theory analysis.秘鲁孕妇中PHQ-9西班牙语版的跨文化效度:拉施克项目反应理论分析
J Affect Disord. 2014 Apr;158:148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of mental disorders in China.中国精神障碍的患病率。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;9(1):13-14. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00430-2.
2
Urdu translation and validation of clinically useful depression outcome scale.临床有效抑郁结局量表的乌尔都语翻译和验证。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;71(11):2524-2530. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.382.
3
Remission and Treatment Augmentation of Depression in the United States.美国抑郁症的缓解与治疗强化
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 2;82(6):21m13988. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m13988.
4
The association of depressive symptoms with disability among adults in China.中国成年人抑郁症状与残疾的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.030. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.《用于重度抑郁症患者的临床实用抑郁结果量表中文版的心理测量学特性》
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Jul 21;17:2387-2395. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S307662. eCollection 2021.
6
Prevalence of suicidal ideation and planning in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of observation studies.重度抑郁症患者自杀意念和自杀计划的发生率:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.115. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
7
Construct Validity and Differential Item Functioning of the PHQ-9 Among Health Care Workers: Rasch Analysis Approach.医疗工作者中患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)的结构效度与项目功能差异:Rasch分析方法
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Apr 8;17:1035-1045. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S271987. eCollection 2021.
8
A Rasch-based validity study of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire.基于 Rasch 模型的哈佛创伤问卷的效度研究。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.071. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Psychometric Properties of the Keratoconus Outcomes Research Questionnaire: A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry Study.《圆锥角膜结局研究问卷的心理测量特性:Save Sight 圆锥角膜登记研究》。
Cornea. 2020 Mar;39(3):303-310. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002169.
10
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study.中国精神障碍的患病率:一项横断面流行病学研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;6(3):211-224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X. Epub 2019 Feb 18.