School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Mental Health Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 2;11(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01255-7.
To examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) in the Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using Rasch analysis.
The sample consisted of 283 patients with MDD (69% females). The Rasch model was applied to examine the overall fit of the Chinese version of CUDOS and the fit of the 18 items. Dimensionality, item-model fit, differential item functioning (DIF), reliability, ordering of response category and targeting were tested to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CUDOS.
Rasch analysis demonstrated the unidimensionality of the Chinese version of CUDOS. Of the 18 items, three items (item 4, item 5, item 6) showed misfit in the model. After merging item 4 into item 3 and item 6 into item 5, the overall model fit improved. The person separation index (PSI) was 3.0 and the person reliability coefficient was 0.90. No evidence of significant DIF was found when associated with gender and age. No disordered category and threshold of the rating response were observed, which meant the response category setting was reasonable. The mean ability of person was - 0.53.
The results suggested that the Chinese version of CUDOS has acceptable psychometric properties. In order to improve the quality and applicability of the Chinese version of CUDOS, the merging of item 4 into item 3 and item 6 into item 5 are suggested.
使用 Rasch 分析检验中文版临床抑郁结局量表(CUDOS)在中国大陆重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中的心理计量学特性。
该样本包括 283 名 MDD 患者(69%为女性)。应用 Rasch 模型检验 CUDOS 中文版的整体拟合度以及 18 个项目的拟合度。检验维度、项目-模型拟合、差异项目功能(DIF)、信度、反应类别排序和目标设定,以检验 CUDOS 中文版的心理计量学特性。
Rasch 分析表明 CUDOS 中文版具有单维性。在 18 个项目中,有 3 个项目(项目 4、项目 5、项目 6)在模型中不拟合。将项目 4 合并到项目 3 中,将项目 6 合并到项目 5 中后,整体模型拟合度得到改善。个体分离指数(PSI)为 3.0,个体可靠性系数为 0.90。在与性别和年龄相关时,未发现明显的 DIF 证据。未观察到分类紊乱和评分反应的阈值,这意味着反应类别设置合理。个体的平均能力为-0.53。
研究结果表明,CUDOS 中文版具有可接受的心理计量学特性。为了提高 CUDOS 中文版的质量和适用性,建议将项目 4 合并到项目 3 中,将项目 6 合并到项目 5 中。