Bhawana Indora, Malik Ashok, Raposo António, Singh Shubha, Yadav Sanjay, Zandonadi Renata Puppin, Lho Linda Heejung, Han Heesup, Thakur Neha
Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India.
CBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisboa, Portugal.
Front Nutr. 2023 Jul 18;10:1184005. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1184005. eCollection 2023.
A survey was conducted in Hisar, located in Haryana, India, to assess the quality of raw chicken meat. To ensure comprehensive coverage, healthy broiler chickens were obtained from various meat retail outlets in Hisar city, encompassing the majority of such establishments. Additionally, a sample of control chickens was obtained from the Livestock Farm, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), Hisar, Haryana, India. The raw chicken meat was grouped into two categories, breast cut and thigh cut. The breast muscles, which include and , and the thigh muscles, which include the abductor muscles, were chosen as the samples for proximate analysis, which included physico-chemical, sensory, and microbiological analyses of raw chicken meat. The analysis of the raw meat in the laboratory revealed inconsistent variations between the control and retail samples in terms of parameters, such as proximate composition, pH, the water-holding capacity (WHC), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), instrumental color analysis, and sensory evaluation. The moisture content of the control breast sample was significantly higher ( < 0.05) than that of the samples from shops 2, 3, and 5. However, it was statistically similar to that of the samples from shops 1, 4, and 6. The total plate and psychrotrophic counts of the control thigh sample were significantly lower than those of the samples from shops 3, 4, 5, and 6. Among the thigh pH values, the samples from shops 1, 2, 5, and 6 had significantly higher pH values than the control sample. The variations in the various parameters were multifactorial and established the superiority of birds slaughtered under laboratory conditions and grown in university farms compared to the raw chicken meat available in retail outlets in Hisar city.
在印度哈里亚纳邦希萨尔市进行了一项调查,以评估生鸡肉的质量。为确保全面覆盖,从希萨尔市的各个肉类零售点获取了健康的肉鸡,涵盖了该市大部分此类场所。此外,还从印度哈里亚纳邦希萨尔市拉腊·拉杰帕特·莱伊兽医与动物科学大学(LUVAS)兽医科学学院的畜牧场获取了对照鸡样本。生鸡肉被分为两类,胸肉切块和大腿肉切块。选择包括胸肌和大腿肌(其中大腿肌包括外展肌)作为样本进行近似分析,其中包括生鸡肉的理化、感官和微生物分析。实验室对生肉的分析显示,对照样本和零售样本在近似组成、pH值、持水能力(WHC)、硫代巴比妥酸(TBA)、仪器颜色分析和感官评价等参数方面存在不一致的差异。对照胸肉样本的水分含量显著高于商店2、3和5的样本(<0.05)。然而,它与商店1、4和6的样本在统计学上相似。对照大腿样本的总平板计数和嗜冷菌计数显著低于商店3、4、5和6的样本。在大腿pH值中,商店1、2、5和6的样本pH值显著高于对照样本。各种参数的差异是多因素的,这表明在实验室条件下屠宰并在大学农场饲养的鸡比希萨尔市零售点的生鸡肉更具优势。