Nyholm Nanna, Danø Anne, Schnack Henrik, Colombo Giorgio Lorenzo
LEO Pharma AS, Ballerup, Denmark.
EY, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul 28;15:607-619. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S417922. eCollection 2023.
The objective of this study was to optimise the cost-effectiveness of different anti-IL17 treatment sequences used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy and Germany over a five-year time horizon.
We adjusted a previously published treatment sequence model for biologic drugs used in psoriasis treatment to an Italian and German setting, respectively. The model included all anti-IL17 biologics currently available in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the markets of scope (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab and bimekizumab). Real-world discontinuation rates were used to model switches between the four anti-IL17 biologics included in the study. The treatment costs were based on label dosing recommendations for each drug, including induction and maintenance therapy, and the manufacturer prices of each drug in Italy and Germany, respectively. We used long-term Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 (PASI100) measures to inform the model on the efficacy for each treatment. The cost-effectiveness in the analysis was evaluated based on the cost per PASI100-responder.
We found that the most cost-effective treatment sequence was achieved by using brodalumab as first-line treatment, bimekizumab as second-line treatment, ixekizumab as third-line treatment and secukinumab as fourth-line treatment in both Italy and Germany, which resulted in a total cost per responder of €128,200 and €138,212, respectively, over a five-year period. Several scenario analyses were also conducted and ensured that the results were robust to changes in key input parameters.
Our study showed that using brodalumab as a first-line therapy to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis in both Italy and Germany leads to the most cost-effective treatment sequence, when compared to all possible combinations of anti-IL17s over a five-year time horizon. In addition, we found that treatment discontinuation and switching are important factors when assessing the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies.
本研究的目的是在五年时间范围内,优化意大利和德国用于治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的不同抗白细胞介素-17治疗方案的成本效益。
我们分别将先前发表的用于银屑病治疗的生物药物治疗方案模型调整为意大利和德国的情况。该模型包括目前在研究范围内的市场上用于治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的所有抗白细胞介素-17生物制剂(司库奇尤单抗、依奇珠单抗、布罗达单抗和比美吉珠单抗)。使用真实世界的停药率来模拟研究中包括的四种抗白细胞介素-17生物制剂之间的转换。治疗成本分别基于每种药物的标签给药建议,包括诱导和维持治疗,以及意大利和德国每种药物的制造商价格。我们使用长期银屑病面积和严重程度指数100(PASI100)测量值来为模型提供每种治疗效果的信息。分析中的成本效益基于每PASI100应答者的成本进行评估。
我们发现,在意大利和德国,最具成本效益的治疗方案是使用布罗达单抗作为一线治疗,比美吉珠单抗作为二线治疗,依奇珠单抗作为三线治疗,司库奇尤单抗作为四线治疗,在五年期间,每个应答者的总成本分别为128,200欧元和138,212欧元。还进行了几项情景分析,并确保结果对关键输入参数的变化具有稳健性。
我们的研究表明,在意大利和德国,与五年时间范围内所有可能的抗白细胞介素-17组合相比,使用布罗达单抗作为一线疗法治疗中度至重度银屑病可导致最具成本效益的治疗方案。此外,我们发现治疗停药和转换是评估生物疗法成本效益时的重要因素。