Galvao Sarah, Bensenor Isabela M, Blaha Michael J, Jones Steven, Toth Peter P, Santos Raul D, Bittencourt Marcio, Lotufo Paulo A, Teixeira Patrícia de Fátima Dos Santos
Post-Graduate Program in Endocrinology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thyroid. 2023 Oct;33(10):1171-1181. doi: 10.1089/thy.2023.0070. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
GlycA is a novel glycoprotein biomarker of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Our objective was to assess the levels of GlycA in individuals with hypothyroidism. We also explored whether levothyroxine (LT4)-treated patients had different levels of GlycA, with attention to thyrotropin (TSH) levels. We performed a cross-sectional analysis, using baseline data from the ELSA-Brasil cohort study. We included only participants with serum TSH and GlycA levels measurements, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( = 4745). We excluded individuals with endogenous hyperthyroidism and those using drugs impacting thyroid function. Participants not taking LT4 and whose serum TSH was 0.4-4.0 mIU/L were classified as euthyroid (EU) and those with elevated TSH as undiagnosed hypothyroidism (UH). For those on LT4 ( = 345), adequacy of treatment was defined as TSH within the reference range. Those with TSH <0.4 mIU/L were considered over-treated (OT), and those >4.0 mIU/L, under-treated (UT). Both (UT+OT) were considered inadequately treated (IT). Group comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis, adjusted Chi-square, and the Dunn test. Additional subgroup analysis were performed in patients with circulating thyroperoxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab+). Respective multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between thyroid-related variables and GlycA levels (Generalized Linear Model), as well as an abnormal GlycA (>400 μmol/L; Logistic Binary Regression). The prevalence rate of UH was 9.8% (467/4745) and, among those on LT4, only 61.7% (213/345) were adequately treated (AT). GlycA levels were higher in IT in comparison to EU (429 vs. 410 μmol/L, < 0.01) but did not differ between UH (413 μmol/L) and euthyroidism. However, the subgroup analysis of those TPO-Ab+ showed that not only those with IT, but also those with UH, had higher levels of GlycA in comparison to euthyroidism (423 and 424 vs. 402 μmol/L, = 0.04). This association between higher levels of GlycA and IT was maintained even in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 1.53, confidence interval 1.03 to 2.31) Lower levels of GlycA were detected in AT (405 μmol/L,) compared with OT (432 μmol/L, 0.04) and UT (423 μmol/L, = 0.02). Patients with IT, both OT and UT, had higher GlycA levels, which may be associated with low-grade systemic inflammation and, possibly, increased cardiovascular risk.
糖化白蛋白(GlycA)是一种新型的系统性炎症和心血管风险的糖蛋白生物标志物。我们的目的是评估甲状腺功能减退患者的GlycA水平。我们还探讨了接受左甲状腺素(LT4)治疗的患者是否具有不同的GlycA水平,并关注促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平。我们使用ELSA - 巴西队列研究的基线数据进行了横断面分析。我们仅纳入了通过磁共振波谱法测量血清TSH和GlycA水平的参与者(n = 4745)。我们排除了内源性甲状腺功能亢进患者以及使用影响甲状腺功能药物的患者。未服用LT4且血清TSH为0.4 - 4.0 mIU/L的参与者被分类为甲状腺功能正常(EU),TSH升高的参与者被分类为未诊断的甲状腺功能减退(UH)。对于服用LT4的参与者(n = 345),治疗的充分性定义为TSH在参考范围内。TSH <0.4 mIU/L的参与者被认为治疗过度(OT),TSH>4.0 mIU/L的参与者被认为治疗不足(UT)。两者(UT + OT)都被认为治疗不充分(IT)。通过Kruskal - Wallis检验、校正卡方检验和Dunn检验进行组间比较。对循环甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(TPO - Ab +)阳性的患者进行了额外的亚组分析。进行了各自的多变量分析以评估甲状腺相关变量与GlycA水平之间的关系(广义线性模型)以及异常GlycA(>400μmol/L;逻辑二元回归)。UH的患病率为9.8%(467/4745),在服用LT4的患者中,只有61.7%(213/345)得到了充分治疗(AT)。与EU相比,IT患者的GlycA水平更高(429对410μmol/L,P <0.01),但UH(413μmol/L)与甲状腺功能正常之间没有差异。然而,TPO - Ab +阳性患者的亚组分析表明,与甲状腺功能正常相比,不仅IT患者,而且UH患者的GlycA水平更高(423和424对402μmol/L,P = 0.04)。即使在多变量分析中,GlycA水平升高与IT之间的这种关联仍然存在(优势比1.53,置信区间1.03至2.31)。与OT(432μmol/L,P = 0.04)和UT(423μmol/L,P = 0.02)相比,AT患者的GlycA水平较低(405μmol/L)。IT患者(包括OT和UT)的GlycA水平较高,这可能与低度全身性炎症有关,并且可能增加心血管风险。