Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Toyota Motor Corporation, Susono, Shizuoka, Japan.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):577-582. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2237621. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
Intersection advanced driver assistance systems (I-ADAS) with the capability to detect possible collisions and perform evasive braking have the potential to reduce the number of intersection crashes. However, these systems will encounter many challenges caused by the complexity of real-world driving conditions. The purpose of this study is to use real-world naturalistic driving data to conduct an initial exploration of the potential challenges for future I-ADAS in straight crossing path (SCP), left turn across path/lateral direction (LTAP/LD), and left turn across path/opposite direction (LTAP/OD) crash configurations.
Intersection crashes were selected from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study. The SHRP 2 dataset includes front-facing, driver-facing, rear-facing, and a hands/feet-facing video and vehicle speed, steering, accelerator, and brake time-series data. This data was reviewed to understand driver sightline obstructions, driver distractions, and initiation of driver responses. The estimated time to collision (TTC) from the precipitating event, defined as when either vehicle entered the intersection without the right-of-way, was computed based on the distance to the impact point divided by the current velocity of the subject vehicle.
The median impact speed was 18.0 km/h for SCP and LTAP/LD crashes and 16.1 km/h for LTAP/OD crashes. The median TTC from the precipitating event was 1.35 s for SCP and LTAP/LD crashes and 1.44 s for LTAP/OD crashes. For SCP crashes, the three main sightline obstruction scenarios were slower vehicles traveling in the same direction waiting to turn right, vehicles in the closer crossing lane, and a parked truck. For LTAP/OD crashes, the sightline obstruction was often oncoming vehicles in a closer lane blocking the view of another vehicle.
Sightline obstructions could present a challenge for future I-ADAS to activate in SCP, LTAP/LD, and LTAP/OD crashes. This study utilized naturalistic driving data to complete a comprehensive analysis of intersection crashes, including driver distractions, evasive maneuvers, and sightline obstructions that can assist in the development of I-ADAS. This analysis is not possible with police-reported crash data only, which does not contain necessary details on the driver and surrounding environment.
具有检测潜在碰撞并执行避撞制动功能的交叉口高级驾驶辅助系统(I-ADAS)有可能减少交叉口碰撞事故的数量。然而,这些系统将遇到由现实世界驾驶条件的复杂性引起的许多挑战。本研究旨在使用真实世界的自然驾驶数据,初步探索未来 I-ADAS 在直穿路径(SCP)、左转对向/侧向(LTAP/LD)和左转对向/对向(LTAP/OD)碰撞配置中的潜在挑战。
从第二战略公路研究计划(SHRP 2)自然驾驶研究中选择交叉口碰撞事故。SHRP 2 数据集包括前向、驾驶员面向、后向和手脚面向的视频以及车辆速度、转向、加速和制动时间序列数据。审查这些数据以了解驾驶员视线障碍物、驾驶员分心和驾驶员响应的启动。从引发事件(定义为车辆在没有路权的情况下进入交叉口的时间)估计的碰撞时间(TTC)是根据到撞击点的距离除以主体车辆的当前速度计算得出的。
SCP 和 LTAP/LD 碰撞的中位冲击速度为 18.0km/h,LTAP/OD 碰撞的中位冲击速度为 16.1km/h。从引发事件的中位 TTC 为 SCP 和 LTAP/LD 碰撞 1.35s,LTAP/OD 碰撞 1.44s。对于 SCP 碰撞,三个主要的视线障碍物场景是等待右转的同方向行驶的较慢车辆、更近的交叉车道中的车辆和停放的卡车。对于 LTAP/OD 碰撞,视线障碍物通常是在更近的车道中迎面而来的车辆挡住了另一辆车的视线。
视线障碍物可能对未来的 I-ADAS 在 SCP、LTAP/LD 和 LTAP/OD 碰撞中激活构成挑战。本研究利用自然驾驶数据完成了对交叉口碰撞的全面分析,包括驾驶员分心、规避动作和视线障碍物,这有助于 I-ADAS 的开发。仅使用警察报告的碰撞数据是不可能进行这种分析的,因为这种数据不包含有关驾驶员和周围环境的必要细节。