Helsinki Health Care Center; Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Nordic Healthcare group, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Oncol. 2023 Sep;62(9):1118-1123. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2241988. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
As cancer incidences are increasing, the means to provide effective palliative care (PC) are called for. There is evidence, that PC may prevent futile treatment at the end of life (EOL) thus implicating that PC decreases resource use at the EOL, however, the effects of outpatient PC units remain largely unknown. We surveyed the national use of Finnish tertiary care PC units and their effects on resource use at the EOL in real-life environments.
Cancer patients treated in the departments of Oncology at all five Finnish university hospitals in 2013 and deceased by 31 December 2014 were identified; of the 6010 patients 2007 were randomly selected for the study cohort. The oncologic therapies received and the resource usage of emergency services and hospital wards were collected from the hospitals' medical records.
A PC unit was visited by 37% of the patients a median 112 days before death. A decision to terminate all life-prolonging cancer treatments was more often made for patients visiting the PC unit (90% vs. 66%, respectively). A visit to a PC unit was associated with significantly fewer visits to emergency departments (ED) and hospitalization during the last 90 days of life; the mean difference in ED visits decreased by 0.48 (SD 0.33 - 0.62, < 0.001), and the mean inpatient days by 7.1 (SD 5.93 - 8.25, < 0.001). A PC visit unit was independently associated with decreased acute hospital resource use during the last 30 and 90 days before death in multivariable analyses.
Cancer patients' contact with a PC unit was significantly associated with the reduced use of acute hospital services at the EOL, however; only one-third of the patients visited a PC unit. Thus, systematic PC unit referral practices for patients with advanced cancer are called for.
随着癌症发病率的增加,需要提供有效的姑息治疗(PC)手段。有证据表明,PC 可以防止生命末期(EOL)的无效治疗,从而暗示 PC 会减少 EOL 时的资源使用,但门诊 PC 单位的效果在很大程度上仍然未知。我们调查了芬兰三级保健 PC 单位的全国使用情况及其在现实环境中对生命末期资源使用的影响。
确定了 2013 年在所有五所芬兰大学医院肿瘤科接受治疗并在 2014 年 12 月 31 日前死亡的癌症患者;在 6010 名患者中,随机选择了 2007 名患者作为研究队列。从医院病历中收集了接受的肿瘤治疗和急诊服务以及医院病房的资源使用情况。
37%的患者在死亡前中位数 112 天接受了 PC 单位的治疗。选择终止所有延长生命的癌症治疗的决定更常发生在接受 PC 单位治疗的患者中(分别为 90%和 66%)。在生命的最后 90 天内,接受 PC 单位治疗的患者前往急诊部(ED)和住院的次数明显减少;ED 就诊次数的平均差异减少了 0.48(SD 0.33-0.62,<0.001),住院天数减少了 7.1(SD 5.93-8.25,<0.001)。在多变量分析中,PC 就诊单位与死亡前最后 30 天和 90 天内急性医院资源使用减少独立相关。
癌症患者与 PC 单位的接触与 EOL 时急性医院服务使用的减少显著相关,但只有三分之一的患者接受了 PC 单位的治疗。因此,需要为晚期癌症患者制定系统的 PC 单位转介实践。