Mitchell Rebecca J, Wijekulasuriya Shalini, du Preez James, Lystad Reidar, Chauhan Ashfaq, Harrison Reema, Curtis Kate, Braithwaite Jeffrey
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia.
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jan;116:105130. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105130. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
As their health declines, many older adults require additional care and move to residential aged care facilities. Despite efforts to reduce it, variation persists in care quality at the end-of-life (EOL) between facilities. Indicators to monitor care variation are therefore required. This rapid systematic review aims to identify population-level indicators of the quality of end-of-life-care (EOLC) for residents of aged care.
A rapid systematic review of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus) for studies that reported on the development, assessment or validation of at least one measure of EOLC quality for residents living in an aged care setting from 1 January 2000 to 18 April 2023 was conducted. Abstracts and full-texts were screened by two reviewers and each indicator critically appraised. Key characteristics of each study were extracted.
From seven studies, 106 EOLC quality indicators (75 of which were unique) for aged care residents were identified. Five studies specifically identified EOLC indicators for older residents with cognitive impairment. The EOLC quality indicators were diverse in nature. There were 31 EOLC quality indicators (22 unique indicators) focused on the structure and process of care provided and 51 (38 unique indicators) identified physical and psychological aspects of care. Twenty-three EOLC quality indicators (14 unique indicators) related to care of the imminently dying patient.
A common suite of population-level EOLC indicators that are reflective of care quality, are clinically appropriate, and important to residents and their families should be identified to monitor EOLC quality within and across jurisdictions.
随着健康状况下降,许多老年人需要更多护理并搬入老年护理机构。尽管已努力减少护理质量差异,但各机构在临终关怀方面的质量差异仍然存在。因此,需要有指标来监测护理差异。本快速系统评价旨在确定老年护理机构居民临终关怀质量的人群水平指标。
对五个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus)进行快速系统评价,以查找2000年1月1日至2023年4月18日期间报告了至少一项针对老年护理机构居民临终关怀质量测量方法的开发、评估或验证的研究。由两名评审员筛选摘要和全文,并对每个指标进行严格评估。提取每项研究的关键特征。
从七项研究中,确定了106项老年护理机构居民临终关怀质量指标(其中75项是独特的)。五项研究专门确定了认知障碍老年居民的临终关怀指标。临终关怀质量指标性质多样。有31项临终关怀质量指标(22项独特指标)关注所提供护理的结构和过程,51项(38项独特指标)确定了护理的身体和心理方面。23项临终关怀质量指标(14项独特指标)与濒死患者的护理有关。
应确定一套共同的、反映护理质量、临床适用且对居民及其家庭重要的人群水平临终关怀指标,以监测不同辖区内和跨辖区的临终关怀质量。