Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, # 2B200 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Placenta. 2023 Sep 7;140:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2023.07.296. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
Lesions of maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) are common in placentas associated with both stillbirth and live birth. The objective of this study was to identify lesions present more commonly in stillborn placentas and those most indicative of MVM and FVM without microscopic pathologic evaluation.
Data were derived from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Lesions were identified according to standard protocols published previously and categorized as either MVM or FVM according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement and macroscopic "umbilical cord at risk" findings. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds of stillbirth with macroscopic findings of MVM or FVM.
595 stillbirths and 1,305 live births were analyzed. FVM lesions (85.2%) were marginally more common (though not statistically different) in stillbirths compared to MVM lesions (81.3%). Macroscopic findings of both MVM and FVM were more common in stillbirths versus livebirths (p < 0.001). Odds ratios of macroscopic MVM and FVM lesions for stillbirth, adjusted for gestational age at delivery, maternal race (minority), ethnicity (Hispanic), age, and history of hypertension or diabetes, were 1.48 (95% CI 1.30-1.69) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.18-1.53), respectively.
Macroscopic features of MVM and FVM are associated with higher odds of stillbirth versus live birth even when controlled for gestational age and maternal factors, which may be a useful clue in determining the pathophysiology of these events. This information is also useful for pathologists when microscopic examination is not available.
母体血管功能不全(MVM)和胎儿血管功能不全(FVM)的病变在与死胎和活产相关的胎盘上很常见。本研究的目的是确定在死胎胎盘上更常见的病变,以及那些最能提示 MVM 和 FVM 而无需微观病理评估的病变。
数据来自死胎协作研究网络。根据先前发表的标准方案识别病变,并根据阿姆斯特丹胎盘工作组共识声明和宏观“脐带风险”发现将其归类为 MVM 或 FVM。采用多变量逻辑回归确定具有 MVM 或 FVM 宏观表现的死产的可能性。
分析了 595 例死胎和 1305 例活产。与 MVM 病变(81.3%)相比,FVM 病变(85.2%)在死胎中更为常见(尽管无统计学差异)。MVM 和 FVM 的宏观表现在死胎中比活产中更为常见(p<0.001)。调整分娩时的胎龄、产妇种族(少数民族)、族裔(西班牙裔)、年龄以及高血压或糖尿病史后,宏观 MVM 和 FVM 病变的死产比值比分别为 1.48(95%CI 1.30-1.69)和 1.34(95%CI 1.18-1.53)。
即使在控制胎龄和产妇因素的情况下,MVM 和 FVM 的宏观特征与死产的可能性更高相关,这可能是确定这些事件病理生理学的有用线索。在没有微观检查时,这些信息对病理学家也很有用。