• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 疫情高峰期对经导管主动脉瓣植入术临床结局的影响。

Impact of COVID-19 Surge Periods on Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 1;204:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.072. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.072
PMID:37536202
Abstract

Healthcare systems adopted various strategies to minimize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to compare baseline characteristics and procedural and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent TAVI during COVID-19 surge periods with those of patients who underwent TAVI during the nonsurge and prepandemic periods. In the prospective Bern TAVI registry, the pandemic period was divided into surge and nonsurge periods on the basis of the mean number of occupied beds in the intensive care unit in each month and matched with 11 months immediately preceding the pandemic. A total of 1,069 patients underwent TAVI between April 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021. Patients who underwent TAVI during surge periods had a higher surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality) than that of patients who underwent TAVI during nonsurge and prepandemic periods. Diagnosis-to-procedure time (in days) was longer for patients who underwent TAVI during the surge period than during the nonsurge and prepandemic periods (95.20 ± 121.07 vs 70.99 ± 72.25 and 60.46 ± 75.43, both p <0.001). At 30 days, all-cause mortality was higher in the surge than in the nonsurge group (4.9 vs 1.1%, hazard ratio 4.68, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 14.10, p = 0.006), and in the surge than in the prepandemic group (4.9 vs 1.3%, hazard ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 10.11, p = 0.012). In conclusion, TAVI during COVID-19 surge periods was associated with higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score, delayed procedure scheduling, and increased 30-day mortality than that of TAVI during nonsurge and prepandemic periods.

摘要

医疗系统采取了各种策略,以尽量减少 COVID-19 大流行对有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)临床结局的影响。我们旨在比较 COVID-19 高峰期间接受 TAVI 治疗的患者与非高峰和大流行前期间接受 TAVI 治疗的患者的基线特征、手术和临床结局。在前瞻性的伯尔尼 TAVI 注册研究中,根据每个月重症监护病房占用床位的平均值,将大流行期间分为高峰期和非高峰期,并与大流行前的 11 个月相匹配。共有 1069 例患者于 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 TAVI 治疗。与非高峰期和大流行前相比,高峰期接受 TAVI 治疗的患者手术风险(胸外科医生预测死亡率)更高。高峰期接受 TAVI 治疗的患者诊断至手术时间(天)长于非高峰期和大流行前(95.20 ± 121.07 与 70.99 ± 72.25 和 60.46 ± 75.43,均 p <0.001)。在 30 天时,高峰期的全因死亡率高于非高峰期(4.9%比 1.1%,风险比 4.68,95%置信区间 1.55 至 14.10,p = 0.006),高峰期也高于大流行前(4.9%比 1.3%,风险比 3.67,95%置信区间 1.34 至 10.11,p = 0.012)。总之,与非高峰期和大流行前相比,COVID-19 高峰期接受 TAVI 治疗与更高的胸外科医生预测死亡率评分、手术时间延迟和 30 天死亡率增加有关。

相似文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 Surge Periods on Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.COVID-19 疫情高峰期对经导管主动脉瓣植入术临床结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 1;204:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.072. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者全因死亡率的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 May 17;327(19):1875-1887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5776.
3
A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.基于中危手术患者的倾向评分匹配,对经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年死亡率结果进行的 3 中心比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;6(5):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Real-World Clinical Practice.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗真实世界临床实践中的重度主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):806-814. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0951. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
6
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on timing and early clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的时机和早期临床结局的影响
Acta Cardiol. 2022 Dec;77(10):937-942. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2119660. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
7
Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.影响 80 岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与手术治疗选择的因素:来自 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):E186-E195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28447. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 研究中危倾向人群的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 May 26.
9
Early- and mid-term outcomes following redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous transcatheter aortic valve implantation.既往接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者再次行外科主动脉瓣置换术的早期和中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jul 11;62(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac375.
10
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉生物瓣衰败患者与再次行主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 18;17(15):1227-1237. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00472.

引用本文的文献

1
A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的简化途径:BENCHMARK 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 1;45(21):1904-1916. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147.
2
Effects of SARS-COV-2 infection on outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute cardiac conditions. A prospective, multicenter cohort study (Swiss Cardiovascular SARS-CoV-2 Consortium).严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染对因急性心脏疾病住院患者预后的影响。一项前瞻性多中心队列研究(瑞士心血管SARS-CoV-2联盟)。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 13;10:1203427. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1203427. eCollection 2023.