Gherson Shirley, Tripp Raquel, Goudelias Deanna, Johnson Aaron M
Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, NY.
J Voice. 2023 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.06.024.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid restructuring of the clinical management of voice and upper airway disorders by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). As in-person therapy sessions were suspended, voice-specialized SLPs across healthcare settings shifted to online teletherapy. In this survey study, we queried voice therapists on their experiences with and opinions regarding the adoption of teletherapy into routine clinical practice.
Voice-specialized SLPs were recruited nationwide to complete an online survey which included questions about the usability of software and hardware, patient management, the effectiveness of therapy, overall satisfaction, and suggestions for improvement.
48 participants completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported frequent technical difficulties and poor access to or understanding of appropriate equipment. Overall, participants endorsed better patient access, attendance, and compliance, as well as increased scheduling flexibility. While 95% of the respondents stated they would recommend teletherapy to another SLP, only 20% supported a shift to exclusively virtual sessions. Forty percent of respondents endorsed a hybrid model consisting of initial in-person sessions followed by virtual ones.
Incorporating teletherapy into clinical voice practice has, for the most part, followed Carl May's normalization process theory framework, in that clinicians have invested understanding, training, time and effort, and appraisal into its implementation. However, the unusually rapid pace of change necessitated by the pandemic has presented its own set of challenges. Given the inherent conveniences of virtual therapy, the online modality is likely here to stay. It is critical that we understand the facilitators and barriers to its successful adoption.
新冠疫情使得言语治疗师(SLP)对嗓音和上呼吸道疾病的临床管理方式迅速进行了调整。由于面对面治疗课程暂停,各地医疗机构中专门从事嗓音治疗的言语治疗师转向了在线远程治疗。在这项调查研究中,我们询问了嗓音治疗师在将远程治疗纳入常规临床实践方面的经验和看法。
在全国范围内招募专门从事嗓音治疗的言语治疗师,以完成一项在线调查,其中包括有关软件和硬件可用性、患者管理、治疗效果、总体满意度以及改进建议等问题。
48名参与者完成了调查。大多数受访者报告经常遇到技术困难,难以获得或理解合适的设备。总体而言,参与者认可远程治疗能让患者更易获得治疗、提高出勤率和依从性,以及增加日程安排的灵活性。虽然95%的受访者表示他们会向另一位言语治疗师推荐远程治疗,但只有20%的人支持完全转向虚拟治疗课程。40%的受访者认可一种混合模式,即先进行面对面的初始治疗课程,然后再进行虚拟治疗课程。
在很大程度上,将远程治疗纳入临床嗓音治疗实践遵循了卡尔·梅的常态化过程理论框架,即临床医生在其实施过程中投入了理解、培训、时间和精力以及评估。然而,疫情带来的异常快速的变化带来了一系列自身的挑战。鉴于虚拟治疗固有的便利性,在线模式可能会持续存在。关键是我们要了解其成功采用的促进因素和障碍。