• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗菌药物降阶梯策略对重症监护病房患者 14 天死亡率的影响:一项采用逆概率治疗加权的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Effect of antimicrobial de-escalation strategy on 14-day mortality among intensive care unit patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study with inverse probability-of-treatment weighting.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, 710004, Xi'an, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Shaanxi, 710061, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08491-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-023-08491-7
PMID:37537526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10401733/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of antimicrobial de-escalation (ADE) strategy and assess its effect on 14-day mortality among intensive care unit patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with infectious diseases between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the initial treatment regimen within 5 days of antimicrobial administration: ADE, No Change, and Other Change. Confounders between groups were screened using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for 14-day mortality. Potential confounders were balanced using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of ADE strategy on 14-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 473 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 53 (11.2%) in the ADE group, 173 (36.6%) in the No Change group, and 247 (52.2%) in the Other Change group. The 14-day mortality rates in the three groups were 9.4%, 11.6%, and 21.9%, respectively. After IPTW, the adjusted odds ratio for 14-day mortality comparing No Change with ADE was 1.557 (95% CI 1.078-2.247, P = 0.0181) while comparing Other Change with ADE was 1.282(95% CI 0.884-1.873, P = 0.1874).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ADE strategy was low among intensive care unit patients. The ADE strategy demonstrated a protective effect or no adverse effect on 14-day mortality compared to the No Change or Other Change strategies, respectively. These findings provide evidence supporting the implementation of the ADE strategy in ICU patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查抗菌药物降阶梯(ADE)策略的流行情况,并评估其对重症监护病房(ICU)患者 14 天死亡率的影响。

方法

对 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间因感染性疾病入住 ICU 的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。根据抗菌药物治疗开始后 5 天内的初始治疗方案,将患者分为三组:ADE、无变化和其他变化。使用单因素方差分析和卡方检验筛选组间混杂因素。采用单因素和多因素分析确定 14 天死亡率的危险因素。使用倾向评分逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)平衡潜在混杂因素,然后进行多因素逻辑回归分析,以评估 ADE 策略对 14 天死亡率的影响。

结果

共纳入 473 例符合条件的患者,其中 ADE 组 53 例(11.2%),无变化组 173 例(36.6%),其他变化组 247 例(52.2%)。三组患者的 14 天死亡率分别为 9.4%、11.6%和 21.9%。经过 IPTW 校正后,无变化组与 ADE 组相比,14 天死亡率的调整比值比为 1.557(95%可信区间 1.078-2.247,P=0.0181),而其他变化组与 ADE 组相比,14 天死亡率的调整比值比为 1.282(95%可信区间 0.884-1.873,P=0.1874)。

结论

ICU 患者中 ADE 策略的应用率较低。与无变化或其他变化策略相比,ADE 策略对 14 天死亡率表现出保护作用或无不良影响。这些发现为在 ICU 患者中实施 ADE 策略提供了证据支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/d351ab2a2746/12879_2023_8491_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/10fab77c7160/12879_2023_8491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/6ae6f6e59733/12879_2023_8491_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/d351ab2a2746/12879_2023_8491_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/10fab77c7160/12879_2023_8491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/6ae6f6e59733/12879_2023_8491_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac2d/10401733/d351ab2a2746/12879_2023_8491_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of antimicrobial de-escalation strategy on 14-day mortality among intensive care unit patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study with inverse probability-of-treatment weighting.抗菌药物降阶梯策略对重症监护病房患者 14 天死亡率的影响:一项采用逆概率治疗加权的回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08491-7.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy.孕期梅毒检测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 29;2014(10):CD010385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010385.pub2.
5
PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGES IN PLATELET TRAJECTORIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS USING THE MEDICAL INFORMATION MART FOR INTENSIVE CARE IV DATABASE.脓毒症患者血小板轨迹变化的预后意义:一项使用重症监护医学信息数据库IV的回顾性分析
Shock. 2025 Mar 1;63(3):371-378. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002493. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Effect of a generalized early mobilization and rehabilitation protocol on outcomes in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective pre-post study.综合早期活动与康复方案对入住重症监护病房的创伤患者预后的影响:一项回顾性前后对照研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 30;29(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05570-w.
8
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults.对危重症成年患者补充谷氨酰胺
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD010050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010050.pub2.
9
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition and enteral versus a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition for adults in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中成人的肠内营养与肠外营养对比以及肠内营养与肠内和肠外营养联合对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 8;6(6):CD012276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012276.pub2.
10
Multidrug-resistant coinfection with multiple microbes: a retrospective study on its risk factors and clinical outcomes.多重微生物的多重耐药合并感染:关于其危险因素和临床结局的回顾性研究。
mSystems. 2025 Jul 10:e0175724. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01757-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline predictors of antibiotics de-escalation from empirical therapies in an intensive care unit: a five-year retrospective study.重症监护病房中经验性治疗抗生素降阶梯的基线预测因素:一项为期五年的回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10752-6.
2
Evaluation of Pharmacy Intern Interventions on Antimicrobial Use in University-Affiliated Hospitals: A Retrospective Analysis.评估药学实习生干预措施对大学附属医院抗菌药物使用的影响:一项回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 26;13(17):5060. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175060.

本文引用的文献

1
Antimicrobial Stewardship in the ICU.重症监护病房中的抗菌药物管理
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;43(1):131-140. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740977. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
Antimicrobial de-escalation in the critically ill patient and assessment of clinical cure: the DIANA study.
危重症患者的抗菌药物降阶梯治疗和临床治愈评估:DIANA 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1404-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06111-5. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Impact of antimicrobial de-escalation on mortality: a literature review of study methodology and recommendations for observational studies.抗菌药物降阶梯治疗对死亡率影响的文献评价:观察性研究方法学及建议
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):405-413. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1743683. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
5
Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: a position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP).危重症患者的抗菌药物降阶梯治疗:欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)和欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)危重症患者研究小组(ESGCIP)的一个工作组的立场声明。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(2):245-265. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05866-w. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
6
De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in critically ill hematology patients: a prospective cohort study.重症血液科患者抗菌治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):743-745. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05554-9. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
Outcomes Associated With De-escalating Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Culture-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia.与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌阴性医院获得性肺炎降阶梯治疗相关的结果。
Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation as a clinical strategy.抗菌药物降阶梯治疗作为一种临床策略的疗效和安全性。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019 Feb;17(2):79-88. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1561275. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Antibiotic Use in the Intensive Care Unit: Optimization and De-Escalation.抗生素在重症监护病房的应用:优化与降级。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):647-655. doi: 10.1177/0885066618762747. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
10
Antibiotic de-escalation: observational causal inference and culture dependence.抗生素降阶梯治疗:观察性因果推断与培养依赖性
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1647-1648. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4443-z. Epub 2016 Jul 18.