Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌根治术后前列腺内肿瘤升级的预测因素综合分析:不同部位病变的播散模式不同。

Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for upstaging in intraprostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy: Different patterns of spread exist in lesions at different locations.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):17776-17787. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6401. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of the clinical staging is crucial for determining the need for radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the current methods for PCa staging may yield incorrect results. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze independent predictors of postoperative upstaging of intraprostatic cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from intraprostatic cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. Intraprostatic cancer was defined as a lesion confined to the prostate, excluding cases where multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) showed the lesion in contact with the prostatic capsule. We assessed independent predictors of extraprostatic extension (EPE) and analyzed their association with positive surgical margin (PSM) status. In addition, based on the distance of the lesion from the capsule on mpMRI, we divided the patients into non-transition zone and transition zone groups for further analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients were included in our study. Logistic regression analysis revealed that biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) (odds ratio, OR: 1.370, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.093-1.718) and perineural invasion (PNI) (OR: 2.746, 95% CI: 1.420-5.309) were predictive factors for postoperative EPE. Both biopsy GG and PNI were associated with lateral (GG: OR: 1.270, 95% CI: 1.074-1.501; PNI: OR: 2.733, 95% CI: 1.521-4.911) and basal (GG: OR: 1.491, 95% CI: 1.194-1.862; PNI: OR: 3.730, 95% CI: 1.929-7.214) PSM but not with apex PSM (GG: OR: 1.176, 95% CI: 0.989-1.399; PNI: OR: 1.204, 95% CI: 0.609-2.381) after RP. Finally, PNI was an independent predictor of EPE in the transition zone (OR: 11.235, 95% CI: 2.779-45.428) but not in the non-transition zone (OR: 1.942, 95% CI: 0.920-4.098).

CONCLUSION

PNI and higher GG may indicate upstaging of tumors in patients with intraprostatic carcinoma. These two factors are associated with PSM in locations other than the apex of the prostate. Importantly, cancer in the transition zone of the prostate is more likely to spread externally through nerve invasion than cancer in the non-transition zone.

摘要

背景

准确评估临床分期对于确定前列腺癌(PCa)是否需要根治性前列腺切除术(RP)至关重要。然而,目前用于 PCa 分期的方法可能会产生不正确的结果。本研究旨在全面分析前列腺内癌术后升级的独立预测因素。

方法

我们对 2019 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受根治性手术的前列腺内癌患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。前列腺内癌定义为局限于前列腺的病变,不包括多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)显示病变与前列腺包膜接触的病例。我们评估了前列腺外延伸(EPE)的独立预测因素,并分析了它们与阳性手术切缘(PSM)状态的关系。此外,根据 MRI 上病变距包膜的距离,我们将患者分为非移行区和移行区两组进行进一步分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 500 例患者。 logistic 回归分析显示,活检 Gleason 分级组(GG)(比值比,OR:1.370,95%置信区间,CI:1.093-1.718)和神经周围侵犯(PNI)(OR:2.746,95%CI:1.420-5.309)是术后 EPE 的预测因素。活检 GG 和 PNI 均与侧(GG:OR:1.270,95%CI:1.074-1.501;PNI:OR:2.733,95%CI:1.521-4.911)和基底(GG:OR:1.491,95%CI:1.194-1.862;PNI:OR:3.730,95%CI:1.929-7.214)PSM 相关,但与尖部 PSM 无关(GG:OR:1.176,95%CI:0.989-1.399;PNI:OR:1.204,95%CI:0.609-2.381)。最后,PNI 是移行区 EPE 的独立预测因素(OR:11.235,95%CI:2.779-45.428),而非非移行区(OR:1.942,95%CI:0.920-4.098)。

结论

PNI 和较高的 GG 可能提示前列腺内癌患者的肿瘤升级。这两个因素与前列腺尖部以外部位的 PSM 有关。重要的是,前列腺移行区的癌症比非移行区更有可能通过神经侵犯向外扩散。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff91/10524000/ce5c230af478/CAM4-12-17776-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验