Suppr超能文献

通过远程医疗提供的物质使用障碍治疗:一项范围综述。

Telemedicine-delivered treatment for substance use disorder: A scoping review.

作者信息

Pham Huyen, Lin Chunqing, Zhu Yuhui, Clingan Sarah E, Lin Lewei Allison, Mooney Larissa J, Murphy Sean M, Campbell Cynthia I, Liu Yanping, Hser Yih-Ing

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Apr;31(3):359-375. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231190945. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

IntroductionThe COVID pandemic prompted a significant increase in the utilization of telemedicine (TM) for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. As we transition towards a "new normal" policy, it is crucial to comprehensively understand the evidence of TM in SUD treatment. This scoping review aims to summarize existing evidence regarding TM's acceptability, quality, effectiveness, access/utilization, and cost in the context of SUD treatment in order to identify knowledge gaps and inform policy decisions regarding TM for SUDs.MethodWe searched studies published in 2012-2022 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources. Findings were synthesized using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 856 relevant articles were screened, with a final total of 42 articles included in the review. TM in SUD treatment was perceived to be generally beneficial and acceptable. TM was as effective as in-person SUD care in terms of substance use reduction and treatment retention; however, most studies lacked rigorous designs and follow-up durations were brief (≤3 months). Telephone-based TM platforms (vs video) were positively associated with older age, lower education, and no prior overdose. Providers generally consider TM to be affordable for patients, but no relevant studies were available from patient perspectives.ConclusionsTM in SUD treatment is generally perceived to be beneficial and acceptable and as effective as in-person care, although more rigorously designed studies on effectiveness are still lacking. Access and utilization of TM may vary by platform. TM service quality and costs are the least studied and warrant further investigations.

摘要

引言

新冠疫情促使物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中远程医疗(TM)的利用率大幅提高。在我们向“新常态”政策过渡的过程中,全面了解远程医疗在物质使用障碍治疗中的证据至关重要。本范围综述旨在总结关于远程医疗在物质使用障碍治疗背景下的可接受性、质量、有效性、可及性/利用率和成本的现有证据,以识别知识空白,并为有关物质使用障碍远程医疗的政策决策提供信息。

方法

我们检索了2012年至2022年发表在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、科学网和其他来源的研究。使用主题分析对研究结果进行综合。

结果

共筛选出856篇相关文章,最终纳入综述的文章共有42篇。物质使用障碍治疗中的远程医疗被普遍认为是有益且可接受的。在减少物质使用和治疗留存率方面,远程医疗与面对面的物质使用障碍护理效果相当;然而,大多数研究缺乏严谨的设计,随访时间较短(≤3个月)。基于电话的远程医疗平台(与视频平台相比)与年龄较大、教育程度较低以及无既往过量用药史呈正相关。提供者普遍认为远程医疗对患者来说是负担得起的,但从患者角度来看,尚无相关研究。

结论

物质使用障碍治疗中的远程医疗通常被认为是有益且可接受的,并且与面对面护理效果相当,尽管仍缺乏关于有效性的更严谨设计的研究。远程医疗的可及性和利用率可能因平台而异。远程医疗服务质量和成本是研究最少的方面,值得进一步调查。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验