Whicker Emily A, Arner Justin W, Edwards Callee, Bradley James P
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 1;11(8):23259671231188390. doi: 10.1177/23259671231188390. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Few studies have evaluated the outcomes of posterior arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in adolescents, especially with regard to outcomes after revision repair.
Adolescent athletes who undergo revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have similar outcomes and return to play when compared with adolescent athletes who underwent primary arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Data were reviewed from patients who underwent posterior shoulder stabilization between 2000 and 2019 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients <11 and >19 years of age and those with multidirectional instability were excluded. Revision surgery was defined as repeat arthroscopic posterior capsular repair. The ability to return to sport (and level of sport), clinical outcomes scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and visual analog scale for pain), and patient-reported perception of range of motion, strength, and satisfaction were recorded. Comparisons between the primary and revision cohorts were made using the chi-square or the Mann-Whitney test.
Included were 180 adolescent patients (182 shoulders) who underwent a primary unidirectional posterior stabilization, with an average follow-up of 6.1 years. Of these patients, 17 patients required revision surgery (9.3% revision rate). At the final follow-up, patients who underwent revision surgery returned to sport at similar rates to those who did not (70.6% vs 85.9%; = .095) and were similarly likely to return to their presurgery level of play (41.1% vs 23.7%; = .10). The no-revision patients had higher ASES scores (76.1 vs 87.1; = .007) as well as less pain and improved subjective range of motion scores. However, both groups had similar subjective strength scores, and both reported that surgical repair was satisfactory (no revision, 93.2% vs revision, 88.2%; = .45).
Adolescent athletes had a low risk of revision surgery and frequently returned to play after arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair, often at a lower level of play. Those who required revision surgery had poorer outcome scores but still reported a high rate of satisfaction.
很少有研究评估青少年关节镜下后侧关节囊唇修复的结果,尤其是翻修修复后的结果。
与接受初次关节镜下单向后侧关节囊唇修复的青少年运动员相比,接受翻修关节镜下单向后侧关节囊唇修复的青少年运动员将有相似的结果并恢复运动。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
回顾2000年至2019年间接受后侧肩关节稳定手术且至少随访2年的患者的数据。排除年龄小于11岁和大于19岁的患者以及多向不稳定患者。翻修手术定义为重复关节镜下后侧关节囊修复。记录恢复运动的能力(以及运动水平)、临床结果评分(美国肩肘外科医师学会[ASES]和疼痛视觉模拟量表)以及患者报告的活动范围、力量和满意度感知。使用卡方检验或曼-惠特尼检验对初次队列和翻修队列进行比较。
纳入180例接受初次单向后侧稳定手术的青少年患者(182个肩关节),平均随访6.1年。其中17例患者需要翻修手术(翻修率9.3%)。在最后随访时,接受翻修手术的患者恢复运动的比例与未接受翻修手术的患者相似(70.6%对85.9%;P = 0.095),并且恢复到术前运动水平的可能性相似(41.1%对23.7%;P = 0.10)。未翻修患者的ASES评分更高(76.1对87.1;P = 0.007),疼痛更少,主观活动范围评分改善。然而,两组的主观力量评分相似,并且都报告手术修复令人满意(未翻修,93.2%对翻修,88.2%;P = 0.45)。
青少年运动员翻修手术风险低,关节镜下后侧关节囊唇修复后经常恢复运动,通常运动水平较低。需要翻修手术的患者结果评分较差,但仍报告满意度较高。