Dubious data and contamination of the research literature on pain.
作者信息
Williams Amanda C de C
机构信息
University College London, London, UK.
University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
出版信息
Br J Pain. 2023 Aug;17(4):328-329. doi: 10.1177/20494637231190866. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Dubious data and contamination of the research literature on pain.关于疼痛研究文献的数据存疑及污染问题。
Br J Pain. 2023 Aug;17(4):328-329. doi: 10.1177/20494637231190866. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
scDEED: a statistical method for detecting dubious 2D single-cell embeddings and optimizing t-SNE and UMAP hyperparameters.scDEED：一种用于检测可疑二维单细胞嵌入并优化t-SNE和UMAP超参数的统计方法。
bioRxiv. 2023 Sep 15:2023.04.21.537839. doi: 10.1101/2023.04.21.537839.
3
Statistical method scDEED for detecting dubious 2D single-cell embeddings and optimizing t-SNE and UMAP hyperparameters.用于检测可疑的 2D 单细胞嵌入并优化 t-SNE 和 UMAP 参数的统计方法 scDEED。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 26;15(1):1753. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45891-y.
4
DIDO: Dubious (weight-estimation) data in, dubious (dosing) data out.迪多：输入可疑（体重估计）数据，输出可疑（给药剂量）数据。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Dec;34(6):1028-1029. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14065. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
5
Re: DIDO: Dubious (weight-estimation) data in, dubious (dosing) data out.关于：DIDO：输入可疑（体重估计）数据，输出可疑（给药）数据。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Dec;34(6):1029. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14067. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
A two-step automatic sleep stage classification method with dubious range detection.一种具有可疑范围检测的两步自动睡眠阶段分类方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2015 Apr;59:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Pursuitworthiness in urgent research: Lessons on well-ordered science from sustainability science.紧急研究中的可追求性：可持续性科学对有序科学的启示
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Apr;98:49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
8
Contamination in Reference Sequence Databases: Time for Divide-and-Rule Tactics.参考序列数据库中的污染：是时候采取分而治之的策略了。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 22;12:755101. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.755101. eCollection 2021.
9
Double data and dubious conclusions, 'Houston do we have a problem?'.双重数据与可疑结论，“休斯顿，我们有麻烦了？”
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):487-488. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06315-9. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
[Dubious documentation of the effect of acupuncture].[针灸疗效的可疑记录]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Oct 16;168(42):3635.
引用本文的文献
1
Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?出版诚信：它是什么，为何重要，如何保障以及我们怎样能做得更好？
J R Soc N Z. 2024 Mar 13;55(2):267-286. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004. eCollection 2025.
2
Responses to concerns raised about publications don't address the concerns raised.对有关出版物提出的担忧所做出的回应并未解决所提出的担忧。
Br J Pain. 2023 Oct;17(5):426-427. doi: 10.1177/20494637231198757. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Zotero 插件