Moretti Laura, Dinu Raducu, Di Mascio Paola
Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184, Rome, Italy.
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 17;9(7):e18378. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18378. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The topographical features of a site and the anthropogenic artefacts inside and outside the airport boundaries influence the infrastructure use. Objects penetrating the obstacle limitation surfaces (OLS) or standing outside those surfaces have to be mapped and risk-assessed because they could be a hazard to air navigation. This study aims to quantify the risk of collision between aircraft and obstacles in the airspace. There are no available procedures in the literature: the authors supposed that the obstacle type and the examined OLS affect the collision risk. The proposed risk values and amplification factors derive from interviews with technicians. The methodology has been implemented in an existing airport with 589 penetrating obstacles: the results highlight that 69.8% of obstacles imply a negligible risk, and 3.7% require further analyses by the competent aviation authority. In this study, buildings and pylons penetrating the Transitional Surface are the most hazardous obstacles.
场地的地形特征以及机场边界内外的人为文物会影响基础设施的使用。穿透障碍物限制面(OLS)或位于这些面之外的物体必须进行测绘和风险评估,因为它们可能对空中航行构成危险。本研究旨在量化空域中飞机与障碍物碰撞的风险。文献中没有可用的程序:作者认为障碍物类型和所检查的OLS会影响碰撞风险。建议的风险值和放大系数来自对技术人员的访谈。该方法已在一个有589个穿透障碍物的现有机场实施:结果表明,69.8%的障碍物意味着可忽略不计的风险,3.7%的障碍物需要主管航空当局进一步分析。在本研究中,穿透过渡面的建筑物和铁塔是最危险的障碍物。