van Haersma Buma Bernhard N D, Peretto Marco, Matar Ziad M, van de Kaa Geerten
Technology, Policy & Management, TU Delft, Jaffalaan 5, Delft 2628BX, the Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e17999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17999. eCollection 2023 Jul.
This paper focuses on the battle for a dominant design for renewable hydrogen electrolysis in which the designs, alkaline and proton exchange membrane, compete for dominance. First, a literature review is performed to determine the most relevant factors that influence technology dominance. Following that, a Best Worst Method analysis is conducted by interviewing multiple industry experts. The most important factors appear to be: Price, Safety, Energy consumption, Flexibility, Lifetime, Stack size and Materials used. The opinion of experts on Proton Exchange Membrane and alkaline electrolyser technologies is slightly skewed in favour of alkaline technologies. However, the margin is too small to identify a winner in this technology battle. The following paper contributes to the ongoing research on modelling the process of technology selection in the energy sector.
本文聚焦于可再生氢电解主导设计的竞争,其中碱性和质子交换膜这两种设计相互竞争以占据主导地位。首先,进行文献综述以确定影响技术主导地位的最相关因素。在此之后,通过采访多位行业专家进行最佳最差方法分析。最重要的因素似乎是:价格、安全性、能源消耗、灵活性、寿命、堆栈尺寸和使用的材料。专家们对质子交换膜和碱性电解槽技术的看法略有偏向碱性技术。然而,差距太小,无法在这场技术竞争中确定胜者。以下论文有助于能源领域技术选择过程建模的 ongoing 研究。 (注:“ongoing”直译为“正在进行的”,这里可能是特定语境下未翻译完整,具体可根据完整语境调整)