Do Imaging Core Laboratories Better Predict Progression Over Clinical Interpretations?
作者信息
Margolis Daniel J A, Ruchalski Kathleen L
机构信息
From the Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 E 68th St, Box 141, New York, NY 10068 (D.J.A.M.); and Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (K.L.R.).
出版信息
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Sep;5(5):e230092. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230092.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Do Imaging Core Laboratories Better Predict Progression Over Clinical Interpretations?影像核心实验室在预测病情进展方面是否比临床解读更具优势？
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Sep;5(5):e230092. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230092.
2
Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy.评估癫痫患者基因组检测结果解读中的实验室间变异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203812. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3812.
3
Discrepancy Rates and Clinical Impact of Imaging Secondary Interpretations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.影像学二次解读的差异率及临床影响：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Sep;15(9):1222-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
How appropriate is therapeutic drug monitoring for lithium? Data from the Belgian external quality assessment scheme.
Clin Biochem. 2015 Jun;48(9):617-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
5
The Functional Imaging Laboratory, 12 Queen Square, London.
Health Estate J. 1996 Jul;50(6):10-3.
6
Interlaboratory comparison of titers of antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi and evaluation of a commercial assay using canine sera.犬血清中抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体效价的实验室间比较及一种商业检测方法的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):16-20. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.16-20.1991.
7
New (or not-so-new) tricks for old dogs: ultrasound imaging in anatomy laboratories.老方法有新（或不那么新）招：解剖实验室中的超声成像
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):195-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1533.
8
QA in the vascular ultrasound lab.
Radiol Technol. 1996 Jan-Feb;67(3):253-6.
9
Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study.定量血流比的可重复性：一项核心实验室间变异性研究。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(3):230-237. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0105. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
10
Secondary Interpretations of Diagnostic Imaging Examinations: Patient Liabilities and Out-of-Pocket Costs.诊断影像学检查的二次解读：患者的责任和自付费用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11):1547-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations.临床试验中常规临床解读与正式 RECIST 1.1 解读评估进展性疾病的差异。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Sep;5(5):e230001. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230001.
2
Predictive power of deep-learning segmentation based prognostication model in non-small cell lung cancer.基于深度学习分割的预后模型在非小细胞肺癌中的预测能力。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 4;13:868471. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.868471. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of Solid Tumor Treatment Response Observed in Clinical Practice With Response Reported in Clinical Trials.比较临床实践中观察到的实体瘤治疗反应与临床试验中报告的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36741.
4
Components of Radiologic Progressive Disease Defined by RECIST 1.1 in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.基于 RECIST1.1 标准评估转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的放射进展性疾病的组成部分。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):103-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182922. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Tumor response assessment: comparison between unstructured free text reporting in routine clinical workflow and computer-aided evaluation based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.肿瘤反应评估：常规临床工作流程中的非结构化自由文本报告与基于RECIST 1.1标准的计算机辅助评估之间的比较
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2527-2533. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2488-1. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
6
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).实体瘤新的疗效评价标准：修订的RECIST指南（第1.1版）
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
7
A radiologist with a ruler..一位拿着尺子的放射科医生。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Apr;24(4):556.
Zotero 插件