• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用 Watchman 与直接口服抗凝剂治疗后 5 年的卒中发生率比较。

5-year stroke rates in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after watchman compared to direct oral anticoagulants.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2024 Mar;83(3):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.07.015
PMID:37541428
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific; Marlborough, MA, USA) is noninferior to warfarin in preventing ischemic strokes while reducing bleeding risks associated with long term anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AFib). The device's performance compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is less well known.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 5-year major bleeding and ischemic stroke rates in patients with nonvalvular AFib who received a WATCHMAN device or DOAC therapy after a major bleeding event.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, 1:1 matched cohort study was derived from the PearlDiver Mariner database from 2010 to 2020. Patients with nonvalvular AFib on oral anticoagulation who had a major bleeding event were identified. Those who received either WATCHMAN or DOAC after resolution of the bleeding event were selected. The two groups were exactly matched 1:1 based on various comorbidities. Rates of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke were compared over 5 years.

RESULTS

Each cohort consisted of 2248 patients after 1:1 matching. The mean CHADS2-VASC score was 4.81 ± 1.25. At 5 years, the WATCHMAN cohort had significantly lower rates of major bleeding events [OR 0.24 (0.21, 0.27)], TIAs [OR 0.75 (0.58, 0.95)], and ischemic strokes [OR 0.72 (0.61, 0.86)]. There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic strokes [OR 1.14 (0.83, 1.58)].

CONCLUSION

Even in a high-risk population, the WATCHMAN is comparable to DOAC therapy in the primary prevention of hemorrhagic strokes and may provide benefit in the rates of bleeding events, TIAs, and ischemic strokes.

摘要

背景

WATCHMAN 装置(波士顿科学公司;美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)在预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(AFib)患者的缺血性中风方面不劣于华法林,同时降低了长期抗凝治疗相关的出血风险。该装置与直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的性能比较鲜为人知。

目的

比较非瓣膜性 AFib 患者在发生大出血事件后接受 WATCHMAN 装置或 DOAC 治疗 5 年后的主要出血和缺血性中风发生率。

方法

这是一项回顾性、多中心、1:1 匹配队列研究,来自 2010 年至 2020 年的 PearlDiver Mariner 数据库。确定正在接受口服抗凝治疗且发生大出血事件的非瓣膜性 AFib 患者。在出血事件解决后,选择接受 WATCHMAN 或 DOAC 治疗的患者。根据各种合并症,两组进行了 1:1 精确匹配。比较两组患者在 5 年内缺血性中风、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、主要出血和脑出血的发生率。

结果

1:1 匹配后,每组各有 2248 例患者。平均 CHADS2-VASC 评分为 4.81±1.25。在 5 年内,WATCHMAN 组的主要出血事件[比值比(OR)0.24(0.21,0.27)]、TIA[OR 0.75(0.58,0.95)]和缺血性中风[OR 0.72(0.61,0.86)]发生率显著降低。但两组患者的脑出血发生率[OR 1.14(0.83,1.58)]无显著差异。

结论

即使在高危人群中,WATCHMAN 与 DOAC 治疗在预防出血性中风方面同样有效,并且可能在出血事件、TIA 和缺血性中风的发生率方面提供获益。

相似文献

1
5-year stroke rates in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after watchman compared to direct oral anticoagulants.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用 Watchman 与直接口服抗凝剂治疗后 5 年的卒中发生率比较。
J Cardiol. 2024 Mar;83(3):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Propensity-Matched Comparison of Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN.经 WATCHMAN 左心耳封堵术后口服抗凝与抗血小板治疗的倾向性匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.004.
3
Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology).采用 Watchman 装置行左心耳封堵术治疗具有口服抗凝禁忌的患者:ASAP 研究(ASA 氯吡格雷与 Watchman 左心耳封堵技术可行性研究)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.035. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
4
Evaluating Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology: Final 2-Year Outcome Data of the EWOLUTION Trial Focusing on History of Stroke and Hemorrhage.评估接受 WATCHMAN 左心耳封堵技术的房颤患者的真实世界临床结局:EWOLUTION 试验的最终 2 年结局数据,重点关注卒中史和出血史。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;12(4):e006841. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006841.
5
Severity of Ischemic Stroke After Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Nonwarfarin Oral Anticoagulants.左心耳封堵术与非华法林口服抗凝剂治疗后缺血性脑卒中的严重程度。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;10(2):270-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
6
Direct Oral Anticoagulant Versus Warfarin After Left Atrial Appendage Closure With WATCHMAN: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.左心耳封堵术后直接口服抗凝药与华法林的比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101335. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101335. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
7
Lower rate of major bleeding in very high risk patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion: A propensity score-matched comparison with direct oral anticoagulant.极高危患者行左心耳封堵术时大出血发生率更低:与直接口服抗凝剂的倾向性评分匹配比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Aug;21(8):1267-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
8
Impact of Previous Stroke on Clinical Outcome in Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: ANAFIE Registry.既往卒中对老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者临床转归的影响:ANA-FIE 登记研究。
Stroke. 2022 Aug;53(8):2549-2558. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038285. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
9
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation : A Decision Analysis.左心耳封堵与房颤抗凝治疗:决策分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):1230-1239. doi: 10.7326/M21-4653. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
10
Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience.左心耳封堵术后与长期华法林治疗的出血结局比较:WATCHMAN 随机试验经验的患者水平汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1925-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Nov 25.