• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价在急诊科使用常规胰岛素与速效胰岛素控制高血糖时的血糖变化。

Evaluation of blood glucose changes with regular versus rapid-acting insulin for hyperglycaemia management in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 30;31(5):534-539. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad058.

DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad058
PMID:37542524
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As emergency department (ED) visits secondary to hyperglycaemia increase, goals should focus on optimising treatment to minimise the length of stay (LOS). Both regular and rapid-acting insulins can effectively treat hyperglycaemia, but have different pharmacokinetic profiles. The purpose of this study is to compare blood glucose (BG) reduction over time in patients receiving subcutaneous regular versus rapid-acting insulin in the ED.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020 included adult ED patients with a BG ≥200 mg/dl who received subcutaneous regular insulin or insulin aspart. The primary endpoint was a change in BG immediately before and ≥30 min after insulin administration over time.

RESULTS

There were 279 patients included in the study (108 regular insulin and 171 insulin aspart). Change in BG over time was 41.5 mg/dl/h in the regular insulin group and 47 mg/dl/h in the insulin aspart group (P = 0.36). There was no difference in hypoglycaemic events, ED LOS, time from insulin administration to discharge and total change in BG during ED stay. Patients who received regular insulin required less additional insulin doses (8.3% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.02), received a greater volume of intravenous fluids (1629 ml vs. 1280 ml, P = 0.02) and higher weight-based dose for the first insulin dose (0.11 units/kg vs. 0.10 units/kg, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in BG reduction between insulin types for hyperglycaemic patients treated in the ED. This suggests that regular insulin and rapid-acting insulin have similar efficacy in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in the ED.

摘要

目的

随着因高血糖而到急诊科(ED)就诊的人数增加,目标应集中于优化治疗,以尽量减少住院时间(LOS)。普通胰岛素和速效胰岛素均可有效治疗高血糖,但药代动力学特征不同。本研究旨在比较 ED 中接受皮下普通胰岛素和速效胰岛素治疗的患者随时间推移血糖(BG)降低情况。

方法

本回顾性图表研究纳入了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间 BG≥200mg/dl 的成年 ED 患者,他们接受了皮下普通胰岛素或门冬胰岛素治疗。主要终点是随时间推移,胰岛素给药前即刻和≥30 分钟后 BG 的变化。

结果

共有 279 例患者纳入研究(108 例普通胰岛素组和 171 例门冬胰岛素组)。普通胰岛素组的 BG 随时间的变化为 41.5mg/dl/h,门冬胰岛素组为 47mg/dl/h(P=0.36)。两组低血糖事件、ED LOS、胰岛素给药至出院时间以及 ED 住院期间 BG 总变化均无差异。接受普通胰岛素的患者需要的追加胰岛素剂量更少(8.3% vs. 18.1%,P=0.02),接受的静脉输液量更大(1629ml vs. 1280ml,P=0.02),首剂胰岛素的体重校正剂量更高(0.11 单位/kg vs. 0.10 单位/kg,P=0.02)。

结论

ED 中治疗高血糖的患者,两种胰岛素类型在 BG 降低方面无显著差异。这表明普通胰岛素和速效胰岛素在 ED 治疗高血糖方面具有相似的疗效。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of blood glucose changes with regular versus rapid-acting insulin for hyperglycaemia management in the emergency department.评价在急诊科使用常规胰岛素与速效胰岛素控制高血糖时的血糖变化。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 30;31(5):534-539. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad058.
2
Treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia beginning in the emergency department: a randomized trial using insulins aspart and detemir compared with usual care.在急诊科开始治疗住院患者的高血糖:一项使用门冬胰岛素和地特胰岛素与常规治疗比较的随机试验。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):279-84. doi: 10.1002/jhm.866.
3
Impact of a subcutaneous insulin protocol in the emergency department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI).皮下胰岛素方案在急诊科的影响:拉什急诊科高血糖干预(REDHI)。
J Emerg Med. 2011 May;40(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
4
The Association of Emergency Department Treatments for Hyperglycemia with Glucose Reduction and Emergency Department Length of Stay.急诊科高血糖治疗与血糖降低及急诊科住院时间的关联
J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):791-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.068. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Intravenous insulin for the management of non-emergent hyperglycemia in the emergency department.静脉内胰岛素用于急诊科非紧急高血糖症的管理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.078. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Comparison of the effect of insulin glulisine to insulin aspart on breakfast postprandial blood glucose levels in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus on multiple daily injections.比较门冬胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素对多次皮下注射胰岛素的 1 型糖尿病患儿早餐后血糖水平的影响。
Endocr Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):614-9. doi: 10.4158/EP12399.OR.
7
Comparison of inpatient insulin regimens with detemir plus aspart versus neutral protamine hagedorn plus regular in medical patients with type 2 diabetes.德谷胰岛素加门冬胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素加正规胰岛素用于2型糖尿病内科患者的住院胰岛素治疗方案比较
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Feb;94(2):564-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1441. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
8
Reliability of Inpatient CGM: Comparison to Standard of Care.住院患者连续血糖监测的可靠性:与常规护理的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):329-335. doi: 10.1177/19322968211062168. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Improved Postprandial Glucose with Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared with Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: The STAT Study.吸入型 Technosphere 胰岛素对比门冬胰岛素治疗接受多次每日胰岛素注射的 1 型糖尿病患者的餐后血糖改善:STAT 研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Oct;20(10):639-647. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0200. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Intensive Versus Nonintensive Supplemental Insulin With a Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Study.强化与非强化补充胰岛素联合基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗 2 型糖尿病住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床研究。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2217-2223. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1606.