• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家层面成人与儿科创伤的容量和严重度比较:创伤质量改进计划队列研究。

A National Comparison of Volume and Acuity for Adult and Pediatric Trauma: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:633-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.018. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.018
PMID:37542778
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most injured children receive trauma care outside of a pediatric trauma center. Differences in physiology, dosing, and injury pattern limit extrapolation of adult trauma principles to pediatrics. We compare US trauma center experience with pediatric and adult trauma resuscitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried the 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program to describe the experience of US trauma centers with pediatric (<15 y) and adult trauma. We quantified blunt, penetrating, burn, and unspecified traumas and compared minor, moderate, severe, and critical traumas (ISS 1-8 Minor, ISS 9-14 Moderate, ISS 15-24 Severe, ISS 25+ Critical). We estimated center-level volumes for adults and children. Institutional identifiers were generated based on unique center specific factors including hospital teaching status, hospital type, verification level, pediatric verification level, state designation, state pediatric designation, and bed size.

RESULTS

A total of 755,420 adult and 76,449 pediatric patients were treated for traumatic injuries. There were 21 times as many critical or major injuries in adults compared to children, 17 times more moderate injuries, and 6 times more minor injuries. Children and adults presented with similar rates of blunt trauma, but penetrating injuries were more common in adults and burn injuries were more common in children. Comparing center-level data, adult trauma exceeded pediatric for every severity and mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

There is relatively limited exposure to high-acuity pediatric trauma at US centers. Investigation into pediatric trauma resuscitation education and simulation may promote pediatric readiness and lead to improved outcomes.

摘要

简介

大多数受伤的儿童在儿科创伤中心之外接受创伤治疗。由于生理学、用药剂量和损伤模式的差异,成人创伤原则不能直接应用于儿科。我们比较了美国创伤中心对儿科和成人创伤复苏的经验。

材料与方法

我们查询了 2019 年创伤质量改进计划,以描述美国创伤中心治疗儿科(<15 岁)和成人创伤的经验。我们量化了钝器伤、穿透伤、烧伤和未特指伤,并比较了轻伤、中度伤、重伤和危重伤(ISS 1-8 分为轻伤,ISS 9-14 分为中度伤,ISS 15-24 分为重伤,ISS 25+为危重伤)。我们估计了成人和儿童的中心级别容量。机构标识符是根据独特的中心特定因素生成的,包括医院教学状态、医院类型、验证级别、儿科验证级别、州指定、州儿科指定和床位大小。

结果

共有 755420 名成人和 76449 名儿科患者因创伤性损伤接受治疗。成人中危重症或重大损伤的比例是儿童的 21 倍,中度损伤的比例是儿童的 17 倍,轻度损伤的比例是儿童的 6 倍。儿童和成人的钝器伤发生率相似,但成人的穿透伤更常见,儿童的烧伤更常见。比较中心级别的数据,成人创伤在每个严重程度和机制上都超过了儿科。

结论

美国中心相对较少接触高风险儿科创伤。对儿科创伤复苏教育和模拟的研究可能会促进儿科准备,并改善治疗结果。

相似文献

1
A National Comparison of Volume and Acuity for Adult and Pediatric Trauma: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Cohort Study.国家层面成人与儿科创伤的容量和严重度比较:创伤质量改进计划队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:633-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.018. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Novel Trauma Composite Score is a more reliable predictor of mortality than Injury Severity Score in pediatric trauma.新型创伤综合评分比损伤严重程度评分更能可靠地预测儿科创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Oct 1;91(4):599-604. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003235.
3
Admission to a Verified Pediatric Trauma Center is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Severely Injured Children.入住经认证的儿科创伤中心与重伤儿童预后改善相关。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Mar;59(3):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.064. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Adolescent blunt solid organ injury: Differences in management strategies and outcomes between pediatric and adult trauma centers.青少年钝性实体器官损伤:儿科和成人创伤中心在治疗策略和结局方面的差异。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.02.054. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
5
Trauma activation: are we making the right call? A 3-year experience at a Level I pediatric trauma center.创伤激活:我们做对了吗?一家一级儿科创伤中心的 3 年经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Oct;46(10):1985-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.06.001.
6
Retrospective review of intervention for traumatic blunt spleen injuries in adolescents by trauma center type.创伤中心类型对青少年创伤性钝性脾损伤干预的回顾性研究
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):185-189. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.010. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Teen trauma without the drama: outcomes of adolescents treated at Ohio adult versus pediatric trauma centers.青少年创伤无戏剧化:在俄亥俄州成人和儿科创伤中心治疗的青少年的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):109-16; discussion 116. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000277.
8
Pediatric penetrating thoracic trauma: Examining the impact of trauma center designation and penetrating trauma volume on outcomes.小儿穿透性胸部创伤:探讨创伤中心指定和穿透性创伤量对预后的影响。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Feb;58(2):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.10.040. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Nationwide analysis of resuscitative thoracotomy in pediatric trauma: Time to differentiate from adult guidelines?全国范围内小儿创伤性抢救性开胸术分析:是否需要与成人指南区分?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):686-690. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002869.
10
Regionalization of trauma care by operative experience: Does the volume of emergent laparotomy matter?创伤救治的区域性分工:急诊剖腹手术量是否重要?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jan 1;90(1):11-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002911.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-Fidelity, In Situ, Accessible Pediatric Mass Casualty Incident Simulation to Evaluate and Improve Pediatric Readiness.低逼真度、现场、可及的儿科大规模伤亡事件模拟,以评估和提高儿科应急准备能力。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Jun 27;21:11538. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11538. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation and Implication of Case Volume Variation in Level 1 and 2 Trauma Centers.一级和二级创伤中心病例数量变化的评估及其影响
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 12;6(2):e589. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000589. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The Patterns and Quality of Acute Trauma Care in A University Hospital - A 5-year Analysis.
一所大学医院急性创伤护理的模式与质量——一项为期5年的分析
Med Arch. 2024;78(3):226-231. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.226-231.