Intra-individual comparison of image quality of the coronary arteries between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems.

PURPOSE

To intra-individually compare the objective and subjective image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) between photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT).

METHOD

Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT system were prospectively enrolled for a research CCTA performed on a PCD-CT system within 30 days. Polychromatic images were reconstructed for both EID- and PCD-CT, while virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were generated at 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 70 keV for PCD-CT. Two blinded readers calculated contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each major coronary artery and rated image noise, vessel attenuation, vessel sharpness, and overall quality on a 1-5 Likert scale. Patients were then stratified by body mass index (BMI) [high (>30 kg/m) vs low (<30 kg/m)] for subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (67.5 ± 9.0 years, 75% male) were included in the study. Compared with EID-CT, coronary artery CNR values from PCD-CT monoenergetic and polychromatic reconstructions were all significantly higher than CNR values from EID-CT, with incrementally greater differences in obese subjects (all p < 0.008). Subjective image noise and sharpness were also significantly higher for all VMI reconstructions compared to EID-CT (all p < 0.008). All subjective scores were significantly higher for 55, 60, and 70 keV PCD-CT than EID-CT values (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved objective and subjective image quality of PCD-CT compared to EID-CT may provide better visualization of the coronary arteries for a wide array of patients, especially those with a high BMI.