• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社论评论:被遗忘的关节评分是有效的,但不应用于比较异质的手术。

Editorial Commentary: The Forgotten Joint Score Is Valid, But Should Not Be Used to Compare Heterogeneous Procedures.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2096-2097. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.005
PMID:37543392
Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures are sometimes difficult to use. In contrast, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is efficient and easy for patients to understand. FJS is used to assess patient awareness of joint symptoms or more specifically, as indicated by the word "forgotten," the lack thereof. Another advantage of the FJS is that it is quite discriminating compared with other patient-reported outcome measures, which may show low ceiling effects, meaning that a maximum score is easy to achieve. The FJS is valuable, but it should not be used to compare heterogeneous procedures.

摘要

患者报告的结果测量有时难以使用。相比之下,遗忘关节评分(FJS)对患者来说既高效又易于理解。FJS 用于评估患者对关节症状的认知程度,或者更具体地说,正如“遗忘”一词所表示的,缺乏这种认知。FJS 的另一个优点是,与其他患者报告的结果测量相比,它具有很强的辨别力,后者可能显示出较低的天花板效应,这意味着达到最高分很容易。FJS 很有价值,但不应用于比较异质的手术。

相似文献

1
Editorial Commentary: The Forgotten Joint Score Is Valid, But Should Not Be Used to Compare Heterogeneous Procedures.社论评论:被遗忘的关节评分是有效的,但不应用于比较异质的手术。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2096-2097. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.005.
2
Good Validity and High Internal Consistency of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Patients After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.内侧开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术后患者中 Forgotten 关节评分 12 的良好有效性和高内部一致性。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2691-2697. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.028. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
3
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.使用“遗忘关节”评分评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者关节置换前后的关节认知。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3346-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3970-4. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
The Forgotten Joint Score-12 as a valuable patient-reported outcome measure for patients after first-time patellar dislocation.遗忘关节评分-12作为首次髌骨脱位患者重要的患者报告结局指标。
Knee. 2020 Mar;27(2):406-413. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Good validity and reliability of forgotten joint score-12 in total knee arthroplasty in Hindi language for Indian population.在印度人群中,遗忘关节评分 12 在全膝关节置换术中的印地语版本具有良好的有效性和可靠性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1150-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06124-z. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 is valid and reliable to assess prosthesis awareness.单髁膝关节置换术:意大利版遗忘关节评分-12在评估假体认知方面有效且可靠。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1250-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06559-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
7
Joint awareness in posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee: validation of the forgotten joint score in long term condition after tibial plateau fracture.膝关节创伤后骨关节炎的关节意识:胫骨平台骨折后长期状况下遗忘关节评分的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 2;15(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0801-y.
8
Validating the forgotten joint score-12 in patients after ACL reconstruction.验证前交叉韧带重建术后患者的遗忘关节评分-12。
Knee. 2017 Aug;24(4):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
9
Low Ceiling Effects of the Forgotten Joint Score Compared With Legacy Measures After Joint-Preserving Procedures: A Systematic Review.关节保留术后被遗忘关节评分与传统测量方法的低天花板效应:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2086-2095. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.107. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
10
Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard.以牛津髋关节评分(Oxford Hip Score)作为参考标准评估全髋关节置换术后被遗忘关节评分(Forgotten Joint Score)。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Jun;90(3):253-257. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1599252. Epub 2019 Apr 1.