Suppr超能文献

大多数控制淡水藻华的处理方法都无效:野外实验的荟萃分析。

Most treatments to control freshwater algal blooms are not effective: Meta-analysis of field experiments.

机构信息

Spring-Ford High School, Royersford, PA 19460, United States.

School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.

出版信息

Water Res. 2023 Sep 1;243:120342. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120342. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

Abstract

Harmful algal blooms negatively impact freshwater, estuarine, and marine systems worldwide, including those used for drinking water, recreation, and aquaculture, through the production of toxic and nontoxic secondary metabolites as well as hypoxic events that occur when algal blooms degrade. Consequently, water resource managers often utilize chemical, bacterial, physical, and/or plant-based treatments to control algal blooms and improve water quality. However, awareness of available treatments may be limited, and there is ambiguity among the effects of algal bloom treatments across studies. Such variation within the literature and lack of knowledge of other tested treatments leave uncertainty for water resource managers when deciding what treatments are best to control algal blooms and improve water quality. Our primary objective was to synthesize data from 39 published and unpublished studies that used one of 28 chemical, bacterial, physical, and/or plant-based treatments in field experiments on various water quality measurements, including phytoplankton pigments and cell density, cyanobacterial toxins (microcystin), and common off-flavors (i.e., taste and odor compounds; geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol). We hypothesized that treatments would improve water quality. Across all studies and treatment types (227 effect sizes), water quality improvements were observed when measured at the time of greatest decline following treatment or at the end of the experiment. However, these findings were primarily mediated by only four chemicals, namely copper sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, and simazine. None of the bacterial, physical, or plant-based treatments were shown to significantly improve water quality by themselves. Results from this synthesis quantitatively showed that most treatments fail to improve water quality in the field and highlight the need for more research on existing and alternative treatments.

摘要

有害藻类水华对全球淡水、河口和海洋系统造成负面影响,包括用于饮用水、娱乐和水产养殖的系统,其途径是产生有毒和无毒的次生代谢物,以及藻类水华降解时发生的缺氧事件。因此,水资源管理者通常利用化学、细菌、物理和/或基于植物的处理方法来控制藻类水华并改善水质。然而,对可用处理方法的认识可能有限,并且不同研究之间藻类水华处理方法的效果存在歧义。文献中的这种变异性以及对其他经过测试的处理方法的认识不足,使得水资源管理者在决定使用哪些处理方法来控制藻类水华和改善水质时存在不确定性。我们的主要目标是综合来自 39 项已发表和未发表的研究的数据,这些研究在各种水质测量的野外实验中使用了 28 种化学、细菌、物理和/或基于植物的处理方法之一,包括浮游植物色素和细胞密度、蓝藻毒素(微囊藻毒素)和常见异味(即味道和气味化合物;土臭素和 2-甲基异莰醇)。我们假设处理方法会改善水质。在所有研究和处理类型(227 个效应量)中,在处理后最大下降时或实验结束时进行测量时,水质得到改善。然而,这些发现主要是由仅四种化学物质介导的,即硫酸铜、过氧化氢、过氧乙酸和西玛津。没有一种细菌、物理或基于植物的处理方法被证明可以单独显著改善水质。这项综合研究的结果定量表明,大多数处理方法都不能在现场改善水质,并强调需要对现有和替代处理方法进行更多研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验