Salzillo Rosa, Boriani Filippo, Atzeni Matteo, Haywood Richard M, Persichetti Paolo, Figus Andrea
University of Cagliari, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, University Hospital Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy; Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
University of Cagliari, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery Unit, University Hospital Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Oct;85:367-375. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.036. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
Venous congestion burdens up to 15% of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. For these cases, venous augmentation by superficial outside shunt (SOS) is associated with 100% success in secondary salvage surgeries. Intraoperative venous augmentation using other techniques yields a 0.3% rate of return to theater due to venous congestion, but there is no evidence assessing the effectiveness of the SOS technique applied preventively. Comparing this preventive approach to data prior to its implementation, we expect to find a reduced number of venous congested flaps with reduced flap losses and revision surgeries.
This retrospective cross-sectional study involved DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed between 2011 and 2020. The control group included patients receiving additional venous anastomosis as a secondary salvage procedure. The "preventive SOS group" included patients who received preventive SOS during the main surgery. Age, body mass index (BMI), pregnancies, perioperative treatments (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemo or radiotherapy), follow-up complications (arterial ischemia, venous congestion, hematomas, partial/total flap loss), and revision surgeries (breast debridement, flap remodeling) were recorded and compared.
Within 695 flaps performed, 397 flaps were included in the control group, and 298 flaps were included in the preventive SOS group. The groups were homogeneous for age (p = 0.418), BMI (p = 0.747), and flap weight (p = 0.064). Fifty-one flaps (12.8%) in the control group compared to zero (0.0%) in the preventive SOS group required return to theater (p < 0.001).
We reported encouraging preliminary results for SOS to prevent DIEP flap venous congestion. These results must be validated prospectively.
静脉淤血影响了高达15%的腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建手术。对于这些病例,通过浅表外分流(SOS)进行静脉增强在二次挽救手术中的成功率为100%。使用其他技术进行术中静脉增强,因静脉淤血导致返回手术室的发生率为0.3%,但尚无证据评估预防性应用SOS技术的有效性。将这种预防性方法与实施前的数据进行比较,我们预计会发现静脉淤血皮瓣的数量减少,皮瓣损失和修复手术减少。
这项回顾性横断面研究涉及2011年至2020年期间进行的DIEP皮瓣乳房重建手术。对照组包括接受额外静脉吻合作为二次挽救手术的患者。“预防性SOS组”包括在主要手术期间接受预防性SOS的患者。记录并比较年龄、体重指数(BMI)、妊娠次数、围手术期治疗(新辅助或辅助化疗或放疗)、随访并发症(动脉缺血、静脉淤血、血肿、部分/全部皮瓣丢失)和修复手术(乳房清创、皮瓣重塑)。
在695例皮瓣手术中,对照组纳入397例皮瓣,预防性SOS组纳入298例皮瓣。两组在年龄(p = 0.418)、BMI(p = 0.747)和皮瓣重量(p = 0.064)方面具有同质性。对照组中有51例皮瓣(12.8%)需要返回手术室,而预防性SOS组为零(0.0%)(p < 0.001)。
我们报告了SOS预防DIEP皮瓣静脉淤血的令人鼓舞的初步结果。这些结果必须进行前瞻性验证。