• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

启动机器人辅助胸外科手术项目:六个月内从楔形切除术到袖状肺叶切除术。初步结论。

Starting a robotic thoracic surgery program: From wedge resection to sleeve lobectomy in six months. Initial conclusions.

作者信息

Paglialunga Pablo Luis, Molins Laureano, Guzmán Rudith, Guirao Angela, Grando Leandro, Sanchez-Lorente David, Guerrero Carlos, Bello Irene, Quiroga Nestor, Boada Marc

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institut Clínic Respiratori (ICR), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institut Clínic Respiratori (ICR), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Dec;101(12):833-840. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cireng.2023.04.020
PMID:37544607
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a rapidly expanding technique. In our study, we aimed to analyze the results of the process to adopt robotic surgery in our Department of Thoracic Surgery.

METHODS

This is an intention-to-treat analysis of a series of consecutive patients operated on using the RATS approach in our hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. Data were registered for patient characteristics, type of surgery, operative times, conversion rate, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay and complications. The IBM SPSS® statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. A cumulative sum analysis of the operating time was performed to define the learning curve.

RESULTS

During the study period, 51 patients underwent robotic surgery, including pulmonary and non-pulmonary interventions. In addition, 15 patients (29.4%) underwent non-pulmonary interventions: one pleural (2%), 2 diaphragmatic (3.9%), and 12 mediastinal (23.5%). Among the mediastinal surgeries, one conversion was necessary (8.3%) for a complex vascular malformation, and 11 were completed by RATS, including 7 (58.3%) thymomas, 3 (25%) pleuro-pericardial cysts, and one (8.3%) neurogenic tumor. Mean operative time was 141 min (104-178), mean chest tube duration was 0.9 days (0-2), and mean length of stay was 1.45 days (1-2). Thirty-six patients underwent lung surgery (70.6%). The complete RATS resections (34; 94.4%) included: 3 wedge resections (11.1%), 2 segmentectomies (3.7%), 28 lobectomies (81.5%), and one sleeve lobectomy (3.7%). Mean surgery time was 194.56 min (141-247), chest tube duration was 3.92 days (1-8), and length of stay was 4.6 days (1-8). Complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%). No 90-day mortalities were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of RATS was achieved with good clinical results and operative times for all indications. A rapid learning curve was accomplished in short time. Previous VATS experience, patient selection, team training and program continuity are fundamental to successfully develop a RATS program.

摘要

引言

机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)是一项迅速发展的技术。在我们的研究中,我们旨在分析在我们胸外科采用机器人手术的过程结果。

方法

这是一项对2021年1月至2022年3月在我院采用RATS方法连续进行手术的一系列患者的意向性分析。记录了患者特征、手术类型、手术时间、中转率、胸管留置时间、住院时间和并发症等数据。使用IBM SPSS®统计软件进行统计分析。对手术时间进行累积和分析以确定学习曲线。

结果

在研究期间,51例患者接受了机器人手术,包括肺部和非肺部干预。此外,15例患者(29.4%)接受了非肺部干预:1例胸膜手术(2%)、2例膈肌手术(3.9%)和12例纵隔手术(23.5%)。在纵隔手术中,1例复杂血管畸形患者需要中转(8.3%),11例通过RATS完成,包括7例胸腺瘤(58.3%)、3例胸膜心包囊肿(25%)和1例神经源性肿瘤(8.3%)。平均手术时间为141分钟(104 - 178),平均胸管留置时间为0.9天(0 - 2),平均住院时间为1.45天(1 - 2)。36例患者接受了肺部手术(70.6%)。完整的RATS切除术(34例;94.4%)包括:3例楔形切除术(11.1%)、2例肺段切除术(3.7%)、28例肺叶切除术(81.5%)和1例袖状肺叶切除术(3.7%)。平均手术时间为194.56分钟(141 - 247),胸管留置时间为3.92天(1 - 8),住院时间为4.6天(1 - 8)。4例患者发生并发症(11.1%)。未记录到90天死亡率。

结论

RATS的实施取得了良好的临床效果和适用于所有适应症的手术时间。在短时间内完成了快速学习曲线。既往电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)经验、患者选择、团队培训和项目连续性是成功开展RATS项目的基础。

相似文献

1
Starting a robotic thoracic surgery program: From wedge resection to sleeve lobectomy in six months. Initial conclusions.启动机器人辅助胸外科手术项目:六个月内从楔形切除术到袖状肺叶切除术。初步结论。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Dec;101(12):833-840. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
2
Credentialing for robotic lobectomy: what is the learning curve? A retrospective analysis of 272 consecutive cases by a single surgeon.机器人肺叶切除术的认证:学习曲线是什么?单外科医生对 272 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00902-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.机器人辅助肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的学习曲线在有了电视辅助肺叶切除术经验后并不陡峭;采用累积和分析的单外科医生经验。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;27:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100362. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).比较机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术和楔形切除术:来自多医院数据库的结果(Premier)。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):929-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
Robotic pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer treatment: program implementation and initial experience.机器人肺叶切除术治疗肺癌:方案实施及初步经验。
J Bras Pneumol. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):185-90. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562015000000212.
6
Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?从电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术到机器人手术治疗肺癌:是否有结果优势?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
7
First Clinical Experience With Single-Port Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: Phase II Trial of the Initial 26 Cases.首例单孔机器人经肛门微创手术的临床经验:26 例初始病例的 II 期试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Aug 1;64(8):1003-1013. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001999.
8
Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for lung tumors: a community tertiary care center experience over four years.机器人视频辅助胸腔镜肺肿瘤切除术:一家社区三级医疗中心四年的经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):619-624. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4249-z. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
9
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.机器人辅助微创与胸腔镜肺叶切除术:学习曲线设置下围手术期结果的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):895-901. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1090-5. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Effectiveness of Robotic Lobectomy-Outcome and Learning Curve in a High Volume Center.高容量中心机器人肺叶切除术的有效性——结果与学习曲线
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;67(7):573-577. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639477. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries.机器人平台在胸外科手术中的应用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 27;13(19):5764. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195764.
2
Robotic Lobectomy Learning Curve Has Better Clinical Outcomes than Videothoracoscopic Lobectomy.机器人肺叶切除术的学习曲线比电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术具有更好的临床结果。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 14;13(6):1653. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061653.