Suppr超能文献

基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型

[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].

作者信息

Zhu Manchen, Hu Chunying, He Yinyan, Qian Yanchun, Tang Sujuan, Hu Qinghe, Hao Cuiping

机构信息

Three Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272030, Shangdong, China.

Admission Service Center, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272030, Shangdong, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the risk factors of in-hospital death in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) based on machine learning, and to construct a predictive model, and to explore the predictive value of the predictive model.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with sepsis who were hospitalized in the ICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from April 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,including demographic information, vital signs, complications, laboratory examination indicators, diagnosis, treatment, etc. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to whether in-hospital death occurred. The cases in the dataset (70%) were randomly selected as the training set for building the model, and the remaining 30% of the cases were used as the validation set. Based on seven machine learning models including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN), a prediction model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients was constructed. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the seven models from the aspects of identification, calibration and clinical application, respectively. In addition, the predictive model based on machine learning was compared with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) models.

RESULTS

A total of 741 patients with sepsis were included, of which 390 were discharged after improvement, 351 died in hospital, and the in-hospital mortality was 47.4%. There were significant differences in gender, age, APACHE II score, SOFA score, Glasgow coma score (GCS), heart rate, oxygen index (PaO/FiO), mechanical ventilation ratio, mechanical ventilation time, proportion of norepinephrine (NE) used, maximum NE, lactic acid (Lac), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), blood uric acid (BUA), pH value, base excess (BE), and K between the death group and the survival group. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of RF, XGBoost, LR, ANN, DT, SVM, KNN models, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients were 0.871, 0.846, 0.751, 0.747, 0.677, 0.657, 0.555, 0.749 and 0.760, respectively. Among all the models, the RF model had the highest precision (0.750), accuracy (0.785), recall (0.773), and F1 score (0.761), and best discrimination. The calibration curve showed that the RF model performed best among the seven machine learning models. DCA curve showed that the RF model exhibited greater net benefit as well as threshold probability compared to other models, indicating that the RF model was the best model with good clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning model can be used as a reliable tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients. RF models has the best predictive performance, which is helpful for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and implement early intervention to reduce mortality.

摘要

目的

基于机器学习分析重症监护病房(ICU)中脓毒症患者院内死亡的危险因素,构建预测模型,并探讨该预测模型的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2015年4月至2021年4月在济宁医学院附属医院ICU住院的脓毒症患者的临床资料,包括人口统计学信息、生命体征、并发症、实验室检查指标、诊断、治疗等。根据患者是否发生院内死亡分为死亡组和存活组。将数据集中70%的病例随机选取作为构建模型的训练集,其余30%的病例作为验证集。基于逻辑回归(LR)、K近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、极限梯度提升(XGBoost)和人工神经网络(ANN)七种机器学习模型,构建脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测模型。分别采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)从识别、校准和临床应用方面评估七种模型的预测性能。此外,将基于机器学习的预测模型与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)模型进行比较。

结果

共纳入741例脓毒症患者,其中390例好转出院,351例院内死亡,院内死亡率为47.4%。死亡组和存活组在性别、年龄、APACHE II评分、SOFA评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、心率、氧合指数(PaO/FiO)、机械通气比例、机械通气时间、去甲肾上腺素(NE)使用比例、最大NE用量、乳酸(Lac)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、白蛋白(ALB)、血清肌酐(SCr)、血尿素氮(BUN)、血尿酸(BUA)、pH值、碱剩余(BE)和钾等方面存在显著差异。ROC曲线分析显示,RF、XGBoost、LR、ANN、DT、SVM、KNN模型、SOFA评分和APACHE II评分预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.871、0.846、0.751、0.747、0.677、0.657、0.555、0.749和0.760。在所有模型中,RF模型的精度(0.750)、准确率(0.785)、召回率(0.773)和F1得分(0.761)最高,判别能力最佳。校准曲线显示,RF模型在七种机器学习模型中表现最佳。DCA曲线显示,与其他模型相比,RF模型具有更大的净效益和阈值概率,表明RF模型是具有良好临床实用性的最佳模型。

结论

机器学习模型可作为预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的可靠工具。RF模型具有最佳的预测性能,有助于临床医生识别高危患者并实施早期干预以降低死亡率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验