Yaghoobi Mohammad, Mehraban Far Parsa, Mbuagbaw Lawrence, Yuan Yuhong, Armstrong David, Thabane Lehana, Moayyedi Paul
Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023 Jan;15(1):5-11. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2023.313. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Studies on the use of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in colorectal screening have long assumed perfect accuracy for colonoscopy. No study to date has directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy and FIT to detect advanced neoplasia (AN) in a head-to-head diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. A comprehensive electronic search was performed for a head-to-head comparison of FIT and colonoscopy using a third acceptable reference standard in asymptomatic adults. Cochrane methodology was used to perform a head-to-head diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis. Quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Two studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 98.5 (95% CI 96.3-100%) and 100% (99.9-100%) for colonoscopy and 16.4% (10.3-22.6%) and 95.4% (94.3-96.4%) for FIT. Colonoscopy was significantly better than FIT ( < 0.0001). The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 1.75 (1.57-1.96) and 0.03 (0.01-0.08) for colonoscopy and 3.02 (2.01-4.55) and 0.88 (0.82-0.95) for FIT, respectively. Colonoscopy provides significantly better diagnostic accuracy to detect AN compared with FIT (GRADE: ⨁⨁◯◯). Our study provided precise sensitivity and specificity of both colonoscopy and FIT and a revision in screening policies based on an updated cost-effectiveness analysis considering the results of the head-to-head analysis.
关于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)在结直肠癌筛查中应用的研究长期以来一直假定结肠镜检查具有完美的准确性。迄今为止,尚无研究在直接对比诊断准确性的荟萃分析中,直接比较结肠镜检查和FIT检测进展期瘤变(AN)的诊断准确性。我们针对无症状成年人,使用第三种可接受的参考标准,对FIT和结肠镜检查进行了直接对比的全面电子检索。采用Cochrane方法进行直接对比诊断试验准确性(DTA)的荟萃分析。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2(QUADAS-2)评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。两项研究符合纳入标准。结肠镜检查的总体敏感性和特异性分别为98.5%(95%CI 96.3 - 100%)和100%(99.9 - 100%),而FIT的总体敏感性和特异性分别为16.4%(10.3 - 22.6%)和95.4%(94.3 - 96.4%)。结肠镜检查显著优于FIT(<0.0001)。结肠镜检查的阳性和阴性似然比(LRs)分别为1.75(1.57 - 1.96)和0.03(0.01 - 0.08),FIT的阳性和阴性似然比分别为3.02(2.01 - 4.55)和0.88(0.82 - 0.95)。与FIT相比,结肠镜检查在检测AN方面具有显著更好的诊断准确性(证据等级:⨁⨁◯◯)。我们的研究提供了结肠镜检查和FIT精确的敏感性和特异性,并根据考虑直接对比分析结果的最新成本效益分析对筛查策略进行了修订。