Elyasinia Fezzeh, Sadeghian Ehsan, Gapeleh Reza, Eslamian Reza, Najjari Khosrow, Soroush Ahmadreza
Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Oct;14(4):437-442. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.305. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is considered the standard surgical approach in patients newly diagnosed with achalasia worldwide. However, proceeding to fundoplication after LHM remains controversial due to the observed postoperative symptoms, including dysphagia and regurgitation. This study was conducted to compare the postoperatively experienced regurgitation and dysphagia between those undergoing LHM with fundoplication and those with mere LHM. : This four-year controlled clinical trial was performed on adult patients with esophageal type two achalasia, referring to the Shariati Hospital, who gave their written informed consent to enroll. The diagnosis of achalasia was confirmed using manometric assessments. The control group underwent LHM with fundoplication, while the cases received LHM without fundoplication. The validated Achalasia Patients Questionnaire was used for assessing the experienced symptoms pre- and postoperatively. Also, esophagography was used to investigate the alterations of the symptoms pre- and postoperatively. : A total of 48 patients were evaluated. 23 were assigned to the case group, while 25 were considered the controls (male to female ratio: 25 to 23). The mean age of the patients was 36.94 years, and the average disease duration was 6.22 years. Cases and controls were matched demographically. There was no statistically significant difference between the cases and controls regarding postoperative active or passive regurgitation or dysphagia to either solids or fluids. Also, the mean score of total clinical symptoms after the surgery was not significantly different between cases and controls. Lastly, esophagography revealed significant improvement regarding all the symptoms postoperatively (=0.001); however, no statistically significant difference existed in this regard between cases and controls. : Our results indicate no significant difference regarding the postoperative achalasia-related symptoms, namely regurgitation and dysphagia, between those patients undergoing LHM with and without fundoplication. However, further studies are required to thoroughly investigate the effects of various fundoplication techniques in relation to all achalasia-related symptoms to confirm these results.
腹腔镜下贲门肌层切开术(LHM)被认为是全球范围内新诊断的贲门失弛缓症患者的标准手术方法。然而,由于观察到术后出现吞咽困难和反流等症状,LHM术后是否进行胃底折叠术仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较接受LHM联合胃底折叠术和单纯LHM患者术后反流和吞咽困难的情况。
这项为期四年的对照临床试验针对转诊至沙里亚蒂医院的成年二型食管贲门失弛缓症患者开展,这些患者均签署了书面知情同意书以参与研究。贲门失弛缓症的诊断通过测压评估得以确认。对照组接受LHM联合胃底折叠术,而病例组仅接受LHM。使用经过验证的贲门失弛缓症患者问卷评估术前和术后出现的症状。此外,食管造影用于研究术前和术后症状的变化。
总共评估了48例患者。23例被分配到病例组,25例被视为对照组(男女比例为25比23)。患者的平均年龄为36.94岁,平均病程为6.22年。病例组和对照组在人口统计学上相匹配。病例组和对照组在术后主动或被动反流、固体或液体吞咽困难方面无统计学显著差异。此外,病例组和对照组术后总临床症状的平均评分也无显著差异。最后,食管造影显示术后所有症状均有显著改善(P=0.001);然而,病例组和对照组在这方面无统计学显著差异。
我们的结果表明,接受LHM联合胃底折叠术和未接受胃底折叠术的患者在术后贲门失弛缓症相关症状(即反流和吞咽困难)方面无显著差异。然而,需要进一步研究以全面调查各种胃底折叠术技术对所有贲门失弛缓症相关症状的影响,以证实这些结果。