Kawanishi Yuzo, Maezono Hazuki, Shimaoka Tsuyoshi, Kitatani Takumi, Naito Katsuaki, Sotozono Maki, Klanliang Kittipit, Takahashi Yusuke, Hayashi Mikako
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamada-Oka Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Division of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Department of Oral Health Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2-5274 Gakkocho-Dori Chuo-Ku, Niigata 951-8514, Japan.
Int J Dent. 2023 Jul 26;2023:3938522. doi: 10.1155/2023/3938522. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to compare an experimental model simulating clinical root canal irrigation (root canal model) with a conventional experimental model immersing dentin sample to irrigants (immersion model) to evaluate removal of the smear layer and decalcification of the root canal dentin using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and two different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution.
Forty-five single-rooted extracted human teeth were prepared using a Ni-Ti rotary file. EDTA, NaOCl, and citric acid were used in the root canal models and the immersion models. After the irrigation protocol, root canal surfaces were observed under scanning electron microscopy. Residual smear and decalcification of the root canal dentin were evaluated objectively by measuring the percentage of the area occupied by visible dentin tubules, the number of visible dentin tubules, and the mean area of a visible single dentin tubule.
Root canal and immersion models with the same irrigation protocol showed significantly different results for smear residues and decalcification of root canal dentin. In the root canal model, neither different EDTA concentrations nor the order of EDTA and NaOCl applications significantly impacted smear residues or decalcification of root canal dentin. Furthermore, no erosion of the root canal dentin surface was observed in any experimental groups in the root canal model using EDTA and NaOCl compared to intact dentin.
Experimental design affected results for residual smear layer and decalcification of root canal dentin. The order of EDTA and NaOCl use and the concentration of EDTA did not affect results. EDTA and NaOCl irrigation did not cause erosion in the root canal model in this study.
本研究旨在比较模拟临床根管冲洗的实验模型(根管模型)与将牙本质样本浸泡于冲洗剂中的传统实验模型(浸泡模型),以评估使用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和两种不同浓度的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液时,根管牙本质玷污层的去除情况及脱钙情况。
使用镍钛旋转锉对45颗单根拔除的人牙进行预备。在根管模型和浸泡模型中使用EDTA、NaOCl和柠檬酸。冲洗方案结束后,在扫描电子显微镜下观察根管表面。通过测量可见牙本质小管所占面积的百分比、可见牙本质小管的数量以及单个可见牙本质小管的平均面积,客观评估根管牙本质的残余玷污层和脱钙情况。
采用相同冲洗方案的根管模型和浸泡模型在根管牙本质玷污层残留及脱钙方面显示出显著不同的结果。在根管模型中,不同的EDTA浓度以及EDTA和NaOCl的应用顺序均未对根管牙本质的玷污层残留或脱钙产生显著影响。此外,与完整牙本质相比,在使用EDTA和NaOCl的根管模型的任何实验组中均未观察到根管牙本质表面的侵蚀。
实验设计影响根管牙本质残余玷污层和脱钙的结果。EDTA和NaOCl的使用顺序以及EDTA的浓度均未影响结果。在本研究中,EDTA和NaOCl冲洗未在根管模型中引起侵蚀。