Liard J F
Circ Res. 1986 May;58(5):631-40. doi: 10.1161/01.res.58.5.631.
In view of our previous findings that a specific antidiuretic (V2) agonist, 4-valine-8-D-arginine vasopressin, acutely increased cardiac output and heart rate in dogs, we examined the hypothesis that interaction with V2-like receptors might contribute to the hemodynamic response seen after blockade of the vasoconstrictor (V1) effect of arginine-vasopressin in dehydrated dogs. After 48 hours of water restriction which increased plasma vasopressin to 10.6 +/- 2.0 pg/ml, the V1 antagonist 1-(beta-mercapto-beta,beta-cyclopentamethylene propionic acid) 2-(O-methyl)tyrosine arginine-vasopressin, 10 micrograms/kg, was injected intravenously into six conscious dogs, and the combined V1 + V2 antagonist 1-(beta-mercapto-beta,beta,cyclopentamethylene propionic acid) 2-(O-ethyl)-D-tyrosine, 4-valine arginine-vasopressin, 10 micrograms/kg, was administered to another six dogs. Mean arterial pressure, cardiac output (electromagnetic flowmeter), and regional blood flows (radioactive microspheres) were measured before and 20-30 minutes after antagonist administration. Mean arterial pressure did not change significantly in either instance. Cardiac output increased by 31.0 +/- 7.1% after V1 blockade, but by only 10.8 +/- 2.1% following V1 + V2 blockade. Blood flow increased significantly and to a similar extent in the skin, the skeletal muscles, and the fat following both antagonists. Conversely, kidney, arterial liver, and bone blood flow increased only after V1 blockade. In six additional, normally hydrated conscious dogs, it was shown that the V1 + V2 antagonist had no significant hemodynamic effects, a finding previously established for the V1 antagonist. The V1 + V2 antagonist completely prevented the hemodynamic effects associated with administration of the V2 agonist 4-valine-8-D-arginine vasopressin, 200 ng/kg, whereas the V1 antagonist did not. Both antagonists had similar effects on the hemodynamic changes induced by nitroprusside infusion, namely a potentiation of the blood pressure lowering action. These results suggest that part of the hemodynamic response to blockade of the vasoconstrictor action of vasopressin in dehydration is caused by unmasking cardiovascular effects linked to the antidiuretic activity of the arginine-vasopressin molecule.
鉴于我们之前的研究发现,一种特定的抗利尿(V2)激动剂,4-缬氨酸-8-D-精氨酸加压素,可使犬的心输出量和心率急性增加,我们检验了以下假设:与V2样受体相互作用可能有助于解释在脱水犬中阻断精氨酸加压素的血管收缩(V1)作用后所观察到的血流动力学反应。在48小时限水使血浆加压素升高至10.6±2.0 pg/ml后,将10微克/千克的V1拮抗剂1-(β-巯基-β,β-环戊亚甲基丙酸)2-(O-甲基)酪氨酸精氨酸加压素静脉注射给6只清醒犬,并将10微克/千克的V1 + V2拮抗剂1-(β-巯基-β,β,环戊亚甲基丙酸)2-(O-乙基)-D-酪氨酸、4-缬氨酸精氨酸加压素给予另外6只犬。在给予拮抗剂前及给药后20 - 30分钟测量平均动脉压、心输出量(电磁流量计)和局部血流量(放射性微球)。在两种情况下,平均动脉压均无显著变化。V1阻断后心输出量增加31.0±7.1%,但V1 + V2阻断后仅增加了10.8±2.1%。两种拮抗剂给药后,皮肤、骨骼肌和脂肪的血流量均显著增加且增加程度相似。相反,仅在V1阻断后肾、肝动脉和骨血流量增加。在另外六只正常水合的清醒犬中,结果显示V1 + V2拮抗剂无显著血流动力学效应,这一结果先前已在V1拮抗剂中得到证实。V1 + V2拮抗剂完全阻断了与给予200纳克/千克V2激动剂4-缬氨酸-8-D-精氨酸加压素相关的血流动力学效应,而V1拮抗剂则没有。两种拮抗剂对硝普钠输注诱导的血流动力学变化具有相似的作用,即增强降压作用。这些结果表明,脱水时对加压素血管收缩作用阻断的部分血流动力学反应是由于揭示了与精氨酸加压素分子抗利尿活性相关的心血管效应所致。