• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射频导管消融术后房颤复发时左心房及左心耳力学比较

Comparison of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

作者信息

Yang You, Liu Biaohu, Ji Wenyan, Ding Jing, Tao Shanqiang, Lian Feifei

机构信息

Department of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2023 Oct;40(10):1048-1057. doi: 10.1111/echo.15670. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1111/echo.15670
PMID:37548034
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become an important treatment strategy for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), AF recurrence after RFCA remains an important issue that plagues clinicians and patients. This study aimed to investigate the association of left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanics with AF recurrence after RFCA and to compare their prognostic values in patients with AF undergoing RFCA.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients with non-valvular AF who underwent RFCA for the first time were included in this study. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the procedure. All patients were followed up for one year after RFCA, and AF recurrence was recorded. Speckle-tracking echocardiography was used to measure LA and LAA global longitudinal strain (GLS). LA and LAA mechanical dispersion (MD) were defined as the standard deviation of time to peak strain at each segment standardized by the R-R interval. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze independent contributors for AF recurrence after RFCA. The prediction efficiency of factors associated with the presence of AF recurrence was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

During 1-year follow-up, 45 (28%) patients had recurrence, and 115 (72%) patients had no recurrence. The age, CHA DS -VASc score, NT-proBNP, LA volume index (LAVI), LA MD, and LAA MD of patients in recurrence group were significantly higher than those in no recurrent group (p < .05). The LAA emptying fraction (LAAEF), LA GLS, and LAA GLS in recurrence group were significantly lower than those in no recurrent group (p < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that LA and LAA GLS were independent contributors for AF recurrence (p < .05), providing incremental values. The AUCs of LA and LAA GLS in predicting AF recurrence were higher than that of other factors, and the LA GLS+LAA GLS joint model had higher prediction efficiency.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the LA and LAA GLS were independent contributors for AF recurrence after RFCA and provided incremental values. LA and LAA GLS can be used as the predictor of AF recurrence after RFCA, and they may be beneficial for the risk stratification of AF recurrence.

摘要

目的

尽管射频导管消融术(RFCA)已成为阵发性或持续性心房颤动(AF)的重要治疗策略,但RFCA术后房颤复发仍是困扰临床医生和患者的重要问题。本研究旨在探讨左心房(LA)和左心耳(LAA)力学与RFCA术后房颤复发的关系,并比较它们在接受RFCA的房颤患者中的预后价值。

方法

本研究共纳入160例首次接受RFCA的非瓣膜性房颤患者。所有患者在手术前均接受经胸超声心动图(TTE)和经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查。所有患者在RFCA术后随访一年,并记录房颤复发情况。采用斑点追踪超声心动图测量LA和LAA的整体纵向应变(GLS)。LA和LAA机械离散度(MD)定义为经R-R间期标准化后各节段峰值应变时间的标准差。采用逻辑回归分析RFCA术后房颤复发的独立影响因素。通过曲线下面积(AUC)的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估与房颤复发相关因素的预测效率。

结果

在1年的随访期间,45例(28%)患者复发,115例(72%)患者未复发。复发组患者的年龄、CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分、NT-proBNP、左房容积指数(LAVI)、LA MD和LAA MD显著高于未复发组(p<0.05)。复发组的LAA排空分数(LAAEF)、LA GLS和LAA GLS显著低于未复发组(p<0.05)。逻辑回归分析显示,LA和LAA GLS是房颤复发的独立影响因素(p<0.05),具有增量价值。LA和LAA GLS预测房颤复发的AUC高于其他因素,且LA GLS+LAA GLS联合模型具有更高的预测效率。

结论

本研究表明,LA和LAA GLS是RFCA术后房颤复发的独立影响因素,具有增量价值。LA和LAA GLS可作为RFCA术后房颤复发的预测指标,可能有助于房颤复发的风险分层。

相似文献

1
Comparison of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.射频导管消融术后房颤复发时左心房及左心耳力学比较
Echocardiography. 2023 Oct;40(10):1048-1057. doi: 10.1111/echo.15670. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Transesophageal echocardiography measures left atrial appendage volume and function and predicts recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation.经食管超声心动图可测量左心耳容积和功能,并预测射频导管消融术后阵发性心房颤动的复发情况。
Echocardiography. 2018 Jul;35(7):985-990. doi: 10.1111/echo.13856. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Assessing Left Atrial Appendage Functions by Transesophageal Echocardiography and Speckle Tracking Imaging to Predict Recurring Atrial Fibrillation Post-Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.经食管超声心动图和斑点追踪成像评估左心耳功能以预测射频导管消融术后心房颤动的复发。
Echocardiography. 2024 Oct;41(10):e15958. doi: 10.1111/echo.15958.
4
Morphological and functional parameters of left atrial appendage play a greater role in atrial fibrillation relapse after radiofrequency ablation.左心耳形态和功能参数在射频消融术后心房颤动复发中起更大作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65056-3.
5
Comparison of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in the risk stratification of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.比较心房颤动患者左心房和左心耳力学在中风风险分层中的作用。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2021 Jan 9;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12947-020-00232-z.
6
Different Responses of Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: a Follow Up MRI study.左心房和左心耳对房颤射频导管消融反应不同:一项随访 MRI 研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 18;8(1):7871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26212-y.
7
A novel predictive model for late recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using left appendage volume measured by cardiac computed tomography.利用心脏计算机断层扫描测量的左心耳容积构建心房颤动导管消融后晚期复发的预测模型。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02169-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Large left atrial appendage predicts the ablation outcome in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation.左心耳较大与高血压合并房颤患者消融治疗预后相关。
J Electrocardiol. 2020 Nov-Dec;63:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
9
Correlation between cardiac rhythm, left atrial appendage flow velocity, and CHA DS -VASc score: Study based on transesophageal echocardiography and 2-dimensional speckle tracking.心律、左心耳血流速度与CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分之间的相关性:基于经食管超声心动图和二维斑点追踪的研究
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Feb;40(2):120-125. doi: 10.1002/clc.22639. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion provides incremental value for thromboembolic risk stratification over CHADS-VASc Score in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.左心耳机械离散度为非瓣膜性心房颤动患者血栓栓塞风险分层提供了比 CHADS2-VASc 评分更有价值的信息。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;307:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and nomogram prediction model for recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.持续性心房颤动患者射频消融术后复发的危险因素及列线图预测模型
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05023-w.
2
Decoding the Rhythm: The Additive Value of Left Atrial Appendage Flow in the Diagnosis of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias.解读心律:左心耳血流在房性快速性心律失常诊断中的附加价值
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025 Jan-Mar;35(1):19-22. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_70_24. Epub 2025 Apr 30.