• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助牵引技术在单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。

Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, PR China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2023 Aug;51(8):3000605231164006. doi: 10.1177/03000605231164006.

DOI:10.1177/03000605231164006
PMID:37548213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10408347/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy is a reliable endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, UBE discectomy involves a single-handed manipulation, which may compromise the utility of the procedure. The present study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of a novel pin-assisted retraction technique.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study involved 57 consecutive patients who underwent UBE lumbar discectomy from July 2021 to May 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the pin-assisted UBE discectomy group (P-UBE group) and the traditional UBE discectomy group (T-UBE group). The patients' perioperative data, clinical outcomes, and radiologic outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, endoscopic irrigation volume, and overall complication rate were significantly lower in the P-UBE group than in the T-UBE group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcome data between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

P-UBE discectomy may have superior safety and efficacy over the traditional technique, and it has the potential to serve as an optional method in UBE lumbar surgery.

摘要

目的

单侧双通道内镜(UBE)椎间盘切除术是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种可靠内镜技术。然而,UBE 椎间盘切除术涉及单手操作,这可能会影响手术的实用性。本研究旨在探讨一种新型的针辅助牵开技术的疗效和安全性。

方法

本单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 5 月期间接受 UBE 腰椎间盘切除术的 57 例连续患者。将患者随机分为针辅助 UBE 椎间盘切除术组(P-UBE 组)和传统 UBE 椎间盘切除术组(T-UBE 组)。收集并比较两组患者的围手术期数据、临床结果和影像学结果。

结果

P-UBE 组的手术时间、术中出血量、内镜冲洗量和总并发症发生率均显著低于 T-UBE 组。两组的临床结果数据无显著差异。

结论

与传统技术相比,P-UBE 椎间盘切除术具有更好的安全性和疗效,有望成为 UBE 腰椎手术的一种可选方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/fd483e4fd43d/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/bf30d0807b71/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/8fa088e7b93f/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/fd483e4fd43d/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/bf30d0807b71/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/8fa088e7b93f/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ca/10408347/fd483e4fd43d/10.1177_03000605231164006-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study.辅助牵引技术在单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Aug;51(8):3000605231164006. doi: 10.1177/03000605231164006.
2
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
3
Comparison of full-endoscopic foraminoplasty and lumbar discectomy (FEFLD), unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy, and microdiscectomy (MD) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.对比全内镜下椎管成形术与腰椎间盘切除术(FEFLD)、单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术(UBE)和显微椎间盘切除术(MD)治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Feb;32(2):542-554. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07510-6. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy with Other Surgical Technics: A Systemic Review of Indications and Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy from the Current Literature.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与其他手术技术的比较:当前文献中单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术适应证和疗效的系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:349-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.153.
5
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single l4/5-level lumbar disk herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗单节段L4/5腰椎间盘突出症的临床比较
Pain Pract. 2022 Feb;22(2):191-199. doi: 10.1111/papr.13078. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.单节段腰椎间盘切除术采用单侧双孔道内镜技术与开放式显微椎间盘切除术的临床比较:一项多中心回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0725-1.
7
Comparison of lumbar microdiscectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy outcomes: a single-center experience.腰椎间盘显微切除术与单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术疗效比较:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Dec 8;40(3):351-358. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.SPINE23718. Print 2024 Mar 1.
8
Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol.比较微创双通道内镜脊柱手术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效和安全性(ENDO-BH 试验):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照等效试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2.
9
Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 30;101(39):e30412. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030612.
10
Clinical Analysis of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Treatment of Severe Lumbar Disc Herniation with UBE Two-Channel Endoscopy and Foraminal Single-Channel Endoscopy Technique.UBE 双通道内镜与经椎间孔单通道内镜技术微创治疗重度腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Oct 13;2022:9264852. doi: 10.1155/2022/9264852. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) compared with conventional open lumbar discectomy with 3D microscope (OLDM) assisted.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术(UBE)与3D显微镜辅助下传统开放式腰椎间盘切除术(OLDM)的临床疗效比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41440. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041440.
2
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.过去十年微创脊柱手术的并发症:一项叙述性综述
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):770-803. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448652.326. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for symptomatic thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum: a case control study.症状性胸椎黄韧带骨化的单侧双门内镜减压:一项病例对照研究
Int Orthop. 2022 Sep;46(9):2071-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05484-0. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for treating cervical spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜下椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉固定治疗颈椎管狭窄症。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jun;164(6):1529-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05212-y. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
A Helpful Third Portal for Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Technical Note.
一种有助于脊髓型颈椎病患者进行单侧双孔道内镜减压的第三入路:技术说明
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Modified far lateral endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary results.改良双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:技术报告及初步结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Apr;163(4):1205-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04758-7. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.单侧双门内镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;6(2):438-446. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.08.
7
How I do it? Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with biportal endoscopic technique.我是如何做到的?经双通道内镜技术辅助的椎间孔外腰椎体间融合术。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):295-299. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04435-1. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Low-Pressure Lumbar Provocation Discography According to Spine Intervention Society/International Association for the Study of Pain Standards Does Not Cause Acceleration of Disc Degeneration in Patients With Symptomatic Low Back Pain: A 7-Year Matched Cohort Study.根据脊柱介入学会/国际疼痛研究协会标准进行的低压腰椎激发椎间盘造影术不会导致有症状的慢性腰痛患者椎间盘退变加速:一项 7 年匹配队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Oct 1;44(19):E1161-E1168. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003085.
9
Evaluation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.单节段腰椎管狭窄症双通道内镜脊柱手术后的术后脊柱硬膜外血肿评估:临床和磁共振成像研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e786-e792. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.150. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
A Systematic Review of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Clinical Results and Complications.单侧双门内镜脊柱手术的系统评价:初步临床结果与并发症
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.038. Epub 2019 Feb 22.