Department of Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Duke Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design Core, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Clin Apher. 2023 Dec;38(6):694-702. doi: 10.1002/jca.22080. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Major bleeding in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been studied in large databases; but without standardizing bleeding definitions. Therefore, we used standardized definitions to evaluate major bleeding in hospitalized patients undergoing TPE using public use data files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III).
In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we identified TPE-treated adults in a first inpatient encounter. We evaluated major bleeding prevalence using (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, (2) packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, or (3) hemoglobin (Hgb) decline. Patients with major bleeding prior to their first TPE were excluded from the analysis.
Among 779 patients undergoing TPE, major bleeding by at least one of the three bleeding definitions occurred in 135 patients (17.3%). For each of the ICD/CPT, PRBC, and Hgb definitions, the prevalence of major bleeding was 2.8% (n = 31), 7.4% (n = 81), and 5.4% (n = 59), respectively. Only 3.7% of bleeds (5/135) were captured by all three definitions and 19.3% (26/135) exclusively by any two pairwise definitions. The addition of PRBC transfusion and Hgb decline to ICD/CPT code definitions increased bleeding prevalence threefold.
Among hospitalized adults undergoing TPE in the REDS-III study, the prevalence of major bleeding was 17.3%. The addition of PRBC and Hgb decline to ICD codes increased bleeding prevalence threefold. Future studies are needed to develop validated models that identify patients at risk for major bleeding during TPE.
已有大型数据库研究了接受治疗性血浆置换(TPE)的患者的大出血情况;但缺乏标准化的出血定义。因此,我们使用标准化定义,通过使用来自受体流行病学和供体评估研究 III(REDS-III)的公共使用数据文件,评估接受 TPE 的住院患者的大出血情况。
在回顾性横断面分析中,我们在首次住院时确定接受 TPE 治疗的成年人。我们使用以下三种出血定义来评估大出血的发生率:(1)国际疾病分类(ICD)或当前程序术语(CPT)代码,(2)输注红细胞悬液(PRBC),或(3)血红蛋白(Hgb)下降。在首次 TPE 之前有大出血的患者被排除在分析之外。
在 779 例接受 TPE 的患者中,有 135 例(17.3%)至少有一种出血定义发生了大出血。对于 ICD/CPT、PRBC 和 Hgb 定义,大出血的发生率分别为 2.8%(n=31)、7.4%(n=81)和 5.4%(n=59)。仅有 3.7%的出血(5/135)被所有三种定义所捕获,而 19.3%(26/135)仅被两种定义中的任意两种所捕获。将 PRBC 输注和 Hgb 下降添加到 ICD/CPT 代码定义中使出血发生率增加了三倍。
在 REDS-III 研究中接受 TPE 的住院成年患者中,大出血的发生率为 17.3%。将 PRBC 和 Hgb 下降添加到 ICD 代码中使出血发生率增加了三倍。未来需要进一步研究以开发可识别 TPE 期间发生大出血风险的患者的验证模型。