• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践中的临床检查:社区药剂师的定性观点。

Clinical checking in practice: qualitative perspectives from community pharmacists.

作者信息

Elgebli Ali, Hall Jason, Phipps Denham L

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 30;31(5):504-511. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad056.

DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad056
PMID:37548434
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Community pharmacists (CPs) are the last healthcare professional to check the clinical appropriateness of prescribed medicines before being dispensed to patients. This process is known as 'clinical checking' and is intended to ensure the prescribed medications are safe and effective. This study aims to explore how CPs carry out clinical checking in practice, and the main factors affecting their clinical decisions.

METHODS

The study was qualitative in nature, and data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. The interview questions aimed to explore how CPs carry out clinical checking in practice. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to recruit a sample representative of CPs in England. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic template analysis.

KEY FINDINGS

Twelve CPs of various professional backgrounds participated in the interviews. The analysis yielded three overarching themes, namely: pharmacists' perception of the clinical checking process; clinical checking as a naturalistic decision-making process and barriers to effective clinical checking. Interviewees described being faced with a trade-off between examining each prescription thoroughly and maintaining the throughput of prescriptions, due to the highly pressurised environment they work within. A number of factors inform this trade-off: (1) assuming the safety of repeat medicines; (2) lacking access to sufficient clinical information and (3) working under challenging circumstances (such as a lack of resources).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical checking is a complex, variable and experience-driven process which is heavily influenced by the surrounding environment and information accessibility. Further research should investigate the cognitive process involved in clinical checking and explore the practicalities and potential benefits of the recommendations identified in this study.

摘要

目的

社区药剂师是在药品配发给患者之前检查处方临床适宜性的最后一道医疗保健专业环节。这一过程被称为“临床检查”,旨在确保所开药物的安全性和有效性。本研究旨在探讨社区药剂师在实际工作中如何进行临床检查,以及影响其临床决策的主要因素。

方法

本研究性质为定性研究,数据通过半结构化访谈收集。访谈问题旨在探讨社区药剂师在实际工作中如何进行临床检查。采用目的抽样策略招募英格兰社区药剂师的代表性样本。对访谈记录进行主题模板分析。

主要发现

12名不同专业背景的社区药剂师参与了访谈。分析得出三个总体主题,即:药剂师对临床检查过程的认知;作为自然决策过程的临床检查以及有效临床检查的障碍。受访者表示,由于工作环境压力极大,他们在彻底检查每张处方与维持处方处理量之间面临权衡。有若干因素影响这一权衡:(1)假定重复用药的安全性;(2)无法获取足够的临床信息;(3)在具有挑战性的情况下工作(如资源匮乏)。

结论

临床检查是一个复杂、多变且受经验驱动的过程,受到周围环境和信息可获取性的严重影响。进一步的研究应调查临床检查中涉及的认知过程,并探索本研究中所确定建议的实用性和潜在益处。

相似文献

1
Clinical checking in practice: qualitative perspectives from community pharmacists.实践中的临床检查:社区药剂师的定性观点。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 30;31(5):504-511. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad056.
2
Exploratory study to identify the process used by pharmacy staff to verify the accuracy of dispensed medicines.探索性研究,以确定药房工作人员用于核实所配发药品准确性的流程。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):233-42. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00255.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
3
Protocols versus practice: unravelling clinical checking variations in community pharmacies in England-a multi-method study.方案与实践:揭示英格兰社区药店临床核对差异——一项多方法研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01743-9. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
4
Supporting respiratory patients in primary care: a qualitative insight from independent community pharmacists in London.在初级医疗保健中为呼吸系统疾病患者提供支持:来自伦敦独立社区药剂师的定性见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3814-2.
5
Considerations of Australian community pharmacists in the provision and implementation of cognitive pharmacy services: a qualitative study.澳大利亚社区药剂师在提供和实施认知药学服务方面的考虑因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06838-x.
6
Community pharmacists' clinical reasoning: a protocol analysis.社区药剂师的临床推理:一项方案分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Dec;41(6):1471-1482. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00906-3. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
7
A qualitative assessment of a community pharmacy cognitive pharmaceutical services program, using a work system approach.采用工作系统方法对社区药房认知药物服务项目进行定性评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
8
A qualitative study on community pharmacists' decision-making process when making a diagnosis.一项关于社区药剂师在进行诊断时决策过程的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1482-1488. doi: 10.1111/jep.12837. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
9
Community pharmacists' perspectives of online health-related information: A qualitative insight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.社区药剂师对在线健康相关信息的看法:来自马来西亚吉隆坡的定性洞察。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):132-139. doi: 10.1177/1833358317697718. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
How pharmacists check the appropriateness of drug therapy? Observations in community pharmacy.药师如何检查药物治疗的适宜性?社区药房的观察。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Mar-Apr;13(2):349-357. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Community pharmacists' decision-making patterns in clinical prescription checking: A simulation-based study.社区药剂师临床处方审核中的决策模式:一项基于模拟的研究。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Jan 21;17:100569. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100569. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Protocols versus practice: unravelling clinical checking variations in community pharmacies in England-a multi-method study.方案与实践:揭示英格兰社区药店临床核对差异——一项多方法研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01743-9. Epub 2024 Jun 1.