Sacchetti Alfred, Hicken Eric, Bukata W Richard, Durso Dana
From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Camden, NJ.
New Jersey Office of Emergency Medical Services, Trenton, NJ.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Apr 1;40(4):289-291. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003027. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Because small children can be transported by private vehicles, many children seek emergency care outside of Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Such transports may access the closest emergency departments (EDs) without knowledge of their pediatric competence. This study quantifies this practice and the concept of mandatory pediatric readiness.
The electronic health records of 3 general EDs and 2 pediatric EDs were queried for all pediatric and young adult visits for the year 2022. Data collected included patient age, ED type, arrival mode (EMS/police or private mode), and disposition (admission/transfer or discharge). Study patients were categorized as "small children" if aged younger than 10 years, "large children" if 10 to 18 years, and "young adult" if 19 to 40 years. Associations between mode of arrival, ED type, and disposition were analyzed through χ 2 and analysis of variance.
The study population included 37,866 small children, 19,108 large children, and 68,293 young adults. When compared with EMS/police transports, a private arrival mode was selected by 96.1% of small children, 90.0% of large children, and 85.4% of young adults ( P < 0.0001). For the admission/transfer patients, private transportation was selected by 87.4% of small children, 73.8% of large children, and 78.8% of young adults ( P < 0.0001). For admitted/transferred children, the private mode was used by 80.4% of those in the general ED and 81.9% in the pediatric ED ( P > 0.41).
Pediatric patients seeking ED care overwhelmingly arrive through a private mode regardless of the severity of their problem or type of ED in which treated. Emergency Medical Services programs and state hospital regulatory agencies need to recognize this practice and assure the pediatric competence of every ED within their system.
由于幼儿可由私家车运送,许多儿童在紧急医疗服务(EMS)之外寻求急救护理。此类运送可能会前往距离最近的急诊科(ED),而不了解其儿科诊疗能力。本研究对这种情况以及强制儿科诊疗准备就绪的概念进行了量化。
查询了2022年3家综合急诊科和2家儿科急诊科的所有儿科及青年成人就诊的电子健康记录。收集的数据包括患者年龄、急诊科类型、到达方式(EMS/警方或私人方式)以及处置情况(住院/转院或出院)。研究患者若年龄小于10岁则分类为“幼儿”,10至18岁为“大龄儿童”,19至40岁为“青年成人”。通过卡方检验和方差分析来分析到达方式、急诊科类型和处置情况之间的关联。
研究人群包括37866名幼儿、19108名大龄儿童和68293名青年成人。与EMS/警方运送相比,96.1%的幼儿、90.0%的大龄儿童和85.4%的青年成人选择了私人到达方式(P<0.0001)。对于住院/转院患者,87.4%的幼儿、73.8%的大龄儿童和78.8%的青年成人选择了私人交通工具(P<0.0001)。对于住院/转院儿童,综合急诊科中有80.4%使用了私人方式,儿科急诊科中有81.9%使用了私人方式(P>0.41)。
寻求急诊护理的儿科患者绝大多数通过私人方式到达,无论其问题的严重程度或接受治疗的急诊科类型如何。紧急医疗服务项目和州医院监管机构需要认识到这种情况,并确保其系统内每个急诊科都具备儿科诊疗能力。